> On 3/31/22 18:22, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> > Are arm packages available at all? If so, what is the right procedure
> > to install them?
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 06:07, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
> From here:
>
> https://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/dists/
>
> I see them in Debian:
>
> Buster on
Uhm...
I'm not practical with apt repos, but, in the Release file, Buster has:
```
Origin: apt.postgresql.org
Label: PostgreSQL for Debian/Ubuntu repository
Suite: buster-pgdg
Codename: buster-pgdg
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 13:35:36 UTC
Architectures: amd64 arm64 i386 ppc64el
```
whereas Stretch h
On 3/31/22 18:22, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
Hello,
Psycopg binary files are built on Debian Stretch images. I have
noticed that, on arm64 platforms, even if the pgdg apt repository is
configured, apt-get will install libpq 9.6 (from the Debian
repository), not the 14 available in pgdg. As a result
Hello,
Psycopg binary files are built on Debian Stretch images. I have
noticed that, on arm64 platforms, even if the pgdg apt repository is
configured, apt-get will install libpq 9.6 (from the Debian
repository), not the 14 available in pgdg. As a result, certain
features are not available on psyc
Hi all,
I've been looking up locking, and perhaps I'm being dense, but
I'm struggling to figure out how to create a lock to make a table
read-only for a short period of time.
I want to set a table to be read-only, so that any other
clients that try to UPDATE
Greetings,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:58 Marc wrote:
> On 29 Mar 2022, at 17:17, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
>- Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org) wrote:
>
> On 2022-Mar-22, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
>
> Are there any disadvantages of increasing the “wal_keep_segments” to a
> hi
On 29 Mar 2022, at 17:17, Stephen Frost wrote:
Greetings,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org) wrote:
On 2022-Mar-22, Shukla, Pranjal wrote:
Are there any disadvantages of increasing the
“wal_keep_segments” to a
higher number say, 500? Will it have any impact on performance of
streamin
