Re: Postgres 13 streaming replication standby not sending password, 'fe_sendauth: no password supplied'

2024-01-10 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 5:51 PM Keaney, Will wrote: > Hello, > > I'm building a new 2-node Postgreql 13 streaming replication cluster. I'm > able to clone the primary to the standby using pg_basebackup. > However, the standby is unable to authenticate to the primary to begin > recovery during

Postgres 13 streaming replication standby not sending password, 'fe_sendauth: no password supplied'

2024-01-10 Thread Keaney, Will
Hello, I'm building a new 2-node Postgreql 13 streaming replication cluster. I'm able to clone the primary to the standby using pg_basebackup. However, the standby is unable to authenticate to the primary to begin recovery during startup. It logs an error, "FATAL: could not connect to the

RE: pgAdmin 8.1 install

2024-01-10 Thread David Barron
On 1/10/24 12:20, David Barron wrote: > Note that v6 and v7 are in subdirectories but v8 is not. If you have > an existing shortcut that you are using, then perhaps it is pointed to > the > v7 directory and needs to be updated to point to the directory that v8 > is installed in. That would

Re: pgAdmin 8.1 install

2024-01-10 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 1/10/24 12:20, David Barron wrote: Note that v6 and v7 are in subdirectories but v8 is not.  If you have an existing shortcut that you are using, then perhaps it is pointed to the v7 directory and needs to be updated to point to the directory that v8 is installed in.  That would also

RE: pgAdmin 8.1 install

2024-01-10 Thread David Barron
> Is there a problem with the installation of 8.1? I’ve installed it 3 times > but when I bring it up it still says I’m at 7.8. The Help > About menu shows > 7.8 as well. > It’s odd because I have gone from 7.6 to 7.7 and 7.7 to 7.8 following the > same steps. When I look at the directory

Re: pgAdmin 8.1 install

2024-01-10 Thread Craig McIlwee
> Is there a problem with the installation of 8.1? I’ve installed it 3 times but when I bring it up it still says I’m at 7.8. The Help > About menu shows 7.8 as well. > It’s odd because I have gone from 7.6 to 7.7 and 7.7 to 7.8 following the same steps. When I look at the directory on my

Re: pgAdmin 8.1 install

2024-01-10 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 1/10/24 11:37 AM, David Barron wrote: I am running Windows 10. I downloaded the Dec 14 release from pgadmin.org I installed by double-clicking on the executable I downloaded and running through the installation wizard without making any changes. Well that looks good to

RE: pgAdmin 8.1 install

2024-01-10 Thread David Barron
On 1/10/24 10:58 AM, David Barron wrote: On 1/10/24 10:47 AM, David Barron wrote: Is there a problem with the installation of 8.1? I’ve installed it 3 times but when I bring it up it still says I’m at 7.8. The Help > About menu shows 7.8 as well. What OS are you using? Where did you get

Re: pgAdmin 8.1 install

2024-01-10 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 1/10/24 10:58 AM, David Barron wrote: On 1/10/24 10:47 AM, David Barron wrote: Is there a problem with the installation of 8.1?  I’ve installed it 3 times but when I bring it up it still says I’m at 7.8.  The Help > About menu shows 7.8 as well. What OS are you using? Where

RE: pgAdmin 8.1 install

2024-01-10 Thread David Barron
David Barron Zencos Consulting LLC 919-995-2356 (Mobile) From: Adrian Klaver Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 1:56 PM To: David Barron ; pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgAdmin 8.1 install EXTERNAL SENDER On 1/10/24 10:47 AM, David Barron wrote: Is there a problem with the

Re: pgAdmin 8.1 install

2024-01-10 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 1/10/24 10:47 AM, David Barron wrote: Is there a problem with the installation of 8.1?  I’ve installed it 3 times but when I bring it up it still says I’m at 7.8.  The Help > About menu shows 7.8 as well. What OS are you using? Where did you get pgAdmin from? How did you install it?

pgAdmin 8.1 install

2024-01-10 Thread David Barron
Is there a problem with the installation of 8.1? I've installed it 3 times but when I bring it up it still says I'm at 7.8. The Help > About menu shows 7.8 as well. I am hesitant to uninstall and install from scratch because I don't want to lose my connections, etc. Thanks architects of

Re: slightly unexpected result

2024-01-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 09:06:31AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > It is mostly documented. > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/queries-with.html# > QUERIES-WITH-MODIFYING > """ > Only one of the modifications takes place, but it is not easy (and sometimes > not possible) to reliably

Re: slightly unexpected result

2024-01-10 Thread David G. Johnston
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 8:46 AM Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:29:54PM +0100, Torsten Förtsch wrote: > > > > > To me that was a bit surprising. I would have expected it to fail with > > something like "can't update the same row twice in the same command". > > > > If I check

Re: failed to setup barman backup when Posgres is running in Podman Container

2024-01-10 Thread kaido vaikla
Hi, It's a typical error for brand new setup. After new backup setup do $ barman switch-xlog --force --archive testdb br Kaido On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 15:58, duc hiep ha wrote: > Dear All, > > I am trying to use Barman to back up PostgreSQL, which is running in a > Podman container. However,

Re: slightly unexpected result

2024-01-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:29:54PM +0100, Torsten Förtsch wrote: > Hi, > > imagine a simple table with 1 row > > =# table tf; >  i | x   > ---+ >  1 | xx > (1 row) > > And this query: > > with x as (update tf set i=i+1 returning *) > , y as (update tf set x=x||'yy' returning *) > select *

failed to setup barman backup when Posgres is running in Podman Container

2024-01-10 Thread duc hiep ha
Dear All, I am trying to use Barman to back up PostgreSQL, which is running in a Podman container. However, I encounter the error "WAL archive: FAILED," as shown below: #barman check testdb Server testdb: WAL archive: FAILED (please make sure WAL shipping is set up) PostgreSQL: OK superuser: OK

slightly unexpected result

2024-01-10 Thread Torsten Förtsch
Hi, imagine a simple table with 1 row =# table tf; i | x ---+ 1 | xx (1 row) And this query: with x as (update tf set i=i+1 returning *) , y as (update tf set x=x||'yy' returning *) select * from x,y; My PG14 gives this result i | x | i | x ---+---+---+--- (0 rows) To me that was a