On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 9:24 AM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-06-12 at 15:14 +0200, Pavol Sekeres wrote:
> > We recently updated our production database to PostgreSQL 12.22 from the
> 9.6.24 version.
> > We didn't want to make a big jump.
>
> But you should have. v12 is out of support.
>
T
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 9:14 AM Pavol Sekeres
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We recently updated our production database to PostgreSQL 12.22 from the
> 9.6.24 version.
>
Will you soon make another jump to a supported version?
> We didn't want to make a big jump.
> It is around 2 TB in size with one stand-by
On Thu, 2025-06-12 at 15:14 +0200, Pavol Sekeres wrote:
> We recently updated our production database to PostgreSQL 12.22 from the
> 9.6.24 version.
> We didn't want to make a big jump.
But you should have. v12 is out of support.
> It is around 2 TB in size with one stand-by replica of equal si
Hi,
We recently updated our production database to PostgreSQL 12.22 from the
9.6.24 version.
We didn't want to make a big jump.
It is around 2 TB in size with one stand-by replica of equal size.
The database is more than 5 years old.
We do run AUTOVACUUM processes on all tables periodically.
We h