Re: pg_upgrade reflink support on OpenZFS

2025-11-14 Thread Thomas Munro
On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 7:16 AM Marcel Menzel wrote: > For the PostgreSQL upgrade to version 18, I took the opportunity to test > the reflink support in pg_upgrade (with --clone) on OpenZFS 2.3.4 / > Linux 6.15.11 and it worked flawlessly, being a huge time saver here. Nice! > I've looked into t

pg_upgrade reflink support on OpenZFS

2025-11-14 Thread Marcel Menzel
Hello List, For the PostgreSQL upgrade to version 18, I took the opportunity to test the reflink support in pg_upgrade (with --clone) on OpenZFS 2.3.4 / Linux 6.15.11 and it worked flawlessly, being a huge time saver here. I've looked into the documentation for pg_upgrade and it's only menti

Re: Pgbackrest info output interpretation

2025-11-14 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
The "database size" is going to be your data directory, MINUS your pg_wal directory, MINUS unlogged/temp relations, and MINUS things that are not needed for recovery (i.e. all the small pg_ directories such as pg_subtrans). The "database backup size" is how much of that 3GB is part of *this* backup

Re: Pgbackrest info output interpretation

2025-11-14 Thread Ron Johnson
./data > 25G ./tablespace > 30G . > [root@db1 as16]# > > On my Repo Server pgbackest info says > > full backup: 20251114-121504F > timestamp start/stop: 2025-11-14 12:15:04+05:30 / 2025-11-14 > 12:20:58+05:30 > wal start

Pgbackrest info output interpretation

2025-11-14 Thread KK CHN
full backup: 20251114-121504F timestamp start/stop: 2025-11-14 12:15:04+05:30 / 2025-11-14 12:20:58+05:30 wal start/stop: 000100050024 / 000100050024 database size: 3GB, database backup size: 3GB repo1: backup size: 431.0MB