Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

Re: Jeff Janes 2019-03-23 > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 8:04 AM Steve Atkins wrote: > > > On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Christian Henz > > There's the BigSQL fork, which had at least some minimal support > > for 10. I've no idea whether it's had / needs anything for 11 > > I just installed

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

Dave Cramer schrieb am 25.03.2019 um 22:33: > Thomas, > > Any chance it would run under graalvm getting rid of the need for the JVM ? > > Dave Cramer It's hard to tell, but I'd say about 70-80% of my users use Windows, so GraalVM is not an option. I also can't bundle it for non-Windows users

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

Thomas, Any chance it would run under graalvm getting rid of the need for the JVM ? Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 07:06, Thomas Kellerer wrote: > kpi6...@gmail.com schrieb am 22.03.2019 um 17:25: > > 95% of my time I use pgadminIII just to

Re: AW: Forks of pgadmin3?

t; Regards > Klaus > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Thomas Kellerer >> Gesendet: Montag, 25. März 2019 12:06 >> An: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org >> Betreff: Re: Forks of pgadmin3? >> >> kpi6...@gmail.com schrieb am 22.03.2019 um 17:25: &

AW: Forks of pgadmin3?

Thank you, I was not aware of this option - this certainly helps. Regards Klaus Von: Murtuza Zabuawala Gesendet: Freitag, 22. März 2019 18:48 An: kpi6...@gmail.com Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists Betreff: Re: Forks of pgadmin3? Opening Query tool or Debugger window in a new separate

AW: Forks of pgadmin3?

Thomas Kellerer > Gesendet: Montag, 25. März 2019 12:06 > An: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org > Betreff: Re: Forks of pgadmin3? > > kpi6...@gmail.com schrieb am 22.03.2019 um 17:25: > > 95% of my time I use pgadminIII just to type select and update > > statements and

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

kpi6...@gmail.com schrieb am 22.03.2019 um 17:25: > 95% of my time I use pgadminIII just to type select and update > statements and review the output rows. > > I know that I can do this in psql but it’s not handy with many > columns. An alternative you might want to try is SQL Workbench/J:

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 16:25, wrote: > I know that I can do this in psql but it’s not handy with many columns. > I know this doesn't solve your root problem but for this issue you might find pspg helpful. https://github.com/okbob/pspg Geoff

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

Am 23.03.19 um 01:36 schrieb Jeff Janes: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 8:04 AM Steve Atkins > wrote: > > There's the BigSQL fork, which had at least some minimal support > for 10. I've no idea whether it's had / needs anything for 11 > > I just installed BigSQL's

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

aren't > going to work. > > Cheers, > > Jeff I think you have little choice other than to give up on pgAdmin3 and any of the forks. The old pgAdmin3 had become difficult to maintain and I doubt any fork will be able to avoid this. I completely understand your frustration with pgAdmin4, th

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 8:04 AM Steve Atkins wrote: > > > > On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Christian Henz > wrote: > > > > There's the BigSQL fork, which had at least some minimal support > for 10. I've no idea whether it's had / needs anything for 11 I just installed BigSQL's v11 of the

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

're only now migrating from > Postgres 9.x, realizing that pgadmin3 does not support Postgres 11. > > I have checked out pgadmin4, but I don't like it at all. My colleagues > feel the same way, and some web searching suggests that we are not > alone. > > So I wonder if th

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

t; *Von:* Tony Shelver > *Gesendet:* Freitag, 22. März 2019 15:34 > *Cc:* PG-General Mailing List > *Betreff:* Re: Forks of pgadmin3? > > > > Or just persevere with pgadmin4 for a few months? Pretty common for > people to hate any major changes to a tool that they a

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

but it’s not handy with many columns. > > For that reason we currently stay with pgadminIII (and this is for us also > one of several reasons to delay any move from 9.6 to a more recent version). > > > > Klaus > > > > *Von:* Tony Shelver > *Gesendet:* Freitag, 22.

AW: Forks of pgadmin3?

of several reasons to delay any move from 9.6 to a more recent version). Klaus Von: Tony Shelver Gesendet: Freitag, 22. März 2019 15:34 Cc: PG-General Mailing List Betreff: Re: Forks of pgadmin3? Or just persevere with pgadmin4 for a few months? Pretty common for people to hate any

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

ng that pgadmin3 does not support Postgres 11. > > > > I have checked out pgadmin4, but I don't like it at all. My colleagues > > feel the same way, and some web searching suggests that we are not > > alone. > > > > So I wonder if there are any active forks of p

Re: Forks of pgadmin3?

s > feel the same way, and some web searching suggests that we are not > alone. > > So I wonder if there are any active forks of pgadmin3? There's the BigSQL fork, which had at least some minimal support for 10. I've no idea whether it's had / needs anything for 11. > > I fou

Forks of pgadmin3?

if there are any active forks of pgadmin3? I found some on Github with some significant changes that I assume were done by people working for VK, the Russian social network. These appear to be personal hacks though (monosyllabic commit messages, build scripts added with hard coded local paths etc