> On Jan 16, 2023, at 09:53, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
>
> I don't see any good way to say: "given this function signature, and the fact
> it cannot be found, what are the next closest function signatures that are
> present".
I can see a use-case for such functionality, though: A "did
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:42 AM arons wrote:
> Why the error happen is clear to me, in the example is also easy to see
> that the 7th parameter is the problem.
> But I'm searching a more general way to find easily which of the parameter
> is the problem.
> Suppose you have a function with 30
Hi
po 16. 1. 2023 v 18:42 odesÃlatel arons napsal:
> Why the error happen is clear to me, in the example is also easy to see
> that the 7th parameter is the problem.
> But I'm searching a more general way to find easily which of the parameter
> is the problem.
> Suppose you have a function with
Why the error happen is clear to me, in the example is also easy to see
that the 7th parameter is the problem.
But I'm searching a more general way to find easily which of the parameter
is the problem.
Suppose you have a function with 30 parameters with mixed sort of types.
They only way I know
On 1/16/23 08:17, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 1/16/23 08:04, arons wrote:
Dear All,
I'm facing a general problem and I'm looking the best, fastest, way
how to identify the problem and solve it.
As example assume we have a function like that:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION testBinding01 (
p_in01
On 1/16/23 08:04, arons wrote:
Dear All,
I'm facing a general problem and I'm looking the best, fastest, way how
to identify the problem and solve it.
As example assume we have a function like that:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION testBinding01 (
p_in01 bigint,
p_in02 bigint,
p_in03 bigint,
