Hello David!
Thanks for taking the time to respond. Upgrading is not in scope right now
for this server even though that is certainly something I will do down the
line.
I talked to a colleague of mine and he dug up something very interesting
and probably answers the behavior I'm seeing, from PG
On Monday, June 4, 2018, Daniel Lagerman wrote:
> I have a pg 9.4.3 server that has one table with calculate age of about
> 320 million, this is the oldest table in this database and therefore the
> age of the DB is the same as the table.
>
It would be advisable to simply upgrade to 9.4.18 and
Hello!
Please note that I have read:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/routine-vacuuming.html#VACUUM-FOR-WRAPAROUND
And I think i understand how the settings are supposed work, however I do
have a question in regards to Autovaccum wrap-around and how it is
triggered. I have a pg
