> On Sep 9, 2025, at 10:27 AM, Ellen Allhatatlan
> wrote:
>
> Reading this article
> https://firebirdsql.org/migrating-from-firebird-to-postgresql-what-can-go-wrong-
> I'm a bit confused (not the first time...)
>
> In part 1. Differences in MVCC implementation - he's saying that "It’s
> not
Hi
> Final thoughts on this: firebird (fmrly interbase) did not achieve the
> level of success in the market that postgres, even though they may have
> been similarly positioned. My take: that disparity in success has more to
> do with postgres having a more open development model, stronger comm
On Tue, 2025-09-09 at 05:07 +, legrand legrand wrote:
> > > what could we expect (in term of downtime in both worlds) ?
>
> > Usually seconds, so plan for ten minutes.
>
> Brrr, I was thînking about a more reliable process.
If you want more reliable numbers, make a test run on your system.
>> AIUI, Michael Stonebraker suggested that the process model
>> would/should be "upgraded" to a threaded one at some point in the
>> system's developement?
> I am going to need a source on this. Process vs Threads: pro and cons are
> very well documented and proven today.
Ask, and it will be
sorry here the link https://github.com/DomenicoL/table-versioning/
Il giorno gio 11 set 2025 alle ore 17:08 Lorusso Domenico <
domenico@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Dear all,
>
> I am gald to share an open-source project I've been developing in my free
> time. It's a bitemporal solution built en
On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 11:03 AM legrand legrand
wrote:
> Hello all the readers,
>
> For some projects we need a fast *manual* switchover to address Near Zero
> downtime maintenance
> (not speaking here about automated failover like those provided by HA
> tools, but just planned, controlled operat
