A shared storage would require a lot of extra work. That's essentially what
AWS Aurora does.
You will have to have functionality to sync in-memory states between nodes,
because all the instances will have cached data that can easily become
stale on any write operation.
That alone is not that simple
t the use-cases I want to address, because I believe
> they are few and far between.
>
> Best,
> Pierre
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2025, at 08:57, Vladimir Churyukin wrote:
>
> A shared storage would require a lot of extra work. That's essentially
> what AWS Aurora do
