Re: [GENERAL] autoincrement???

2001-07-12 Thread Ben-Nes Michael
Use the Serial type for address_id. And you should read the Manuals ! :) - Original Message - From: "Markus Jais" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 12:20 AM Subject: [GENERAL] autoincrement??? > hi > I have the following problem: > > I create the

Re: [GENERAL] autoincrement???

2001-07-12 Thread Jason Earl
You could either try: CREATE TABLE address ( address_id int SERIAL, street VARCHAR(40), zipcode INT, city VARCHAR(40), country VARCHAR(40) ); Or you could do the same thing yourself manually with: CREATE sequence address_id_seq; CREATE TABLE address ( address_id int PRIMARY KEY D

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql revisited. Some questions about the product

2001-07-12 Thread Joseph Shraibman
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > 6. Can databases be partitioned over multiple physical files. Can > > You have to use symlinks to move to other file systems. That's not what he asked. He asked about files, and the answer is yes. -- Joseph Shraibman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Increase signal to noise

Re: [GENERAL] Large table load (40 millon rows) - WAL hassles

2001-07-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Version: Postgres 7.1.2 > > A product we are developing requires frequent loading > of a large number of rows into a table. We are using > the "copy file" command, but with WAL we are effectively > doubling the amount of disk writing we are doing. > > After the rows are loaded we do a "create

Re: [GENERAL] Visual Modeling programs

2001-07-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Anyone know of any visual modelling apps (like CA's ERWin ) that work well > with pg? > I Have been using erwin but just discovered it isn't creating my pk, fk or > unique constraints. > I am using the odbc v3.0 target repository option in erwin. Dbdesigner. -- Bruce Momjian

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql revisited. Some questions about the product

2001-07-12 Thread Mike Mascari
> > Some time ago I posted to comp.databases a list of requirements which > > IMHO any RDBMS product must meet to be generally useful in commercial > > applications. > > > > I got some responses back regarding Postgresql but a lot of > > improvements have since been made, so I am reposting the ori

[GENERAL] Re: autoincrement???

2001-07-12 Thread Philip Hallstrom
Look at the SERIAL type and the CREATE SEQUENCE documentation. -philip On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Markus Jais wrote: > hi > I have the following problem: > > I create the following table: > > CREATE TABLE address ( > address_id int PRIMARY KEY , > street VARCHAR(40), > zi

[GENERAL] Re: autoincrement???

2001-07-12 Thread Gregory Wood
> Can you please tell me, how to do this in postgresql Use a SERIAL datatype: http://postgresql.crimelabs.net/users-lounge/docs/7.1/user/datatype.html#DAT ATYPE-SERIAL ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http:

[GENERAL] autoincrement???

2001-07-12 Thread Markus Jais
hi I have the following problem: I create the following table: CREATE TABLE address ( address_id int PRIMARY KEY , street VARCHAR(40), zipcodeINT, city VARCHAR(40), countryVARCHAR(40) ); Now, I want the address_id to get incremented eve

[GENERAL] Visual Modeling programs

2001-07-12 Thread Morgan Curley
Anyone know of any visual modelling apps (like CA's ERWin ) that work well with pg? I Have been using erwin but just discovered it isn't creating my pk, fk or unique constraints. I am using the odbc v3.0 target repository option in erwin. Thanks, Morgan ---(end of bro

Re: [GENERAL] Bad news for Open Source databases, acording to survey

2001-07-12 Thread Guy Fraser
Blah Blah Blah Who cares if GMC or some other big company want to throw a huge amount of computer resources and money for support personnel and contracts! I have worked with Oracle. It is a pig on resources, a nightmare and daymare to administer. Like all proprietary software bug fixes and enhan

Re: [GENERAL] Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)

2001-07-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I notice the "urgent" item for point-in-time recovery doesn't have > >> the '-' indicating a 7.2 item. > >> > >> When is that planned? > > > I hope for 7.2. > > What grounds do you have for hoping that? If there's anyone working > on it, they're

Re: [GENERAL] vacuum and 24/7 uptime

2001-07-12 Thread Martín Marqués
On Mié 11 Jul 2001 20:49, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Mi? 11 Jul 2001 13:46, Ryan Mahoney wrote: > > > Hi Mark, This is being worked on now. I believe the 7.2 release will > > > have enable you to run a vacuum with no downtime. > > > > AFAIK, if UNDO is implemented, no vacuum will be needed to fr

[GENERAL] \df+ and pg_proc query

2001-07-12 Thread Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos
I assume that there is in fact a difference between doing: \df+ and: select oid,proname,prosrc from pg_proc where proname='func_name'; because I have a plpgsql function for a trigger, which I can see with the second method (the select...) but not with the first method (the \df+ ). Is it not

Re: [GENERAL] Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)

2001-07-12 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I notice the "urgent" item for point-in-time recovery doesn't have >> the '-' indicating a 7.2 item. >> >> When is that planned? > I hope for 7.2. What grounds do you have for hoping that? If there's anyone working on it, they're sure keeping a migh

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL for Windows

2001-07-12 Thread Andre Schnabel
Hi! PostgreSQL runs with Windows (NT and 2000). Clientapplications should run under Win9x / ME too (I never tried that). Best way to get a running PostgreSQL-Server is installing cygwin (http://www.cygwin.com/) an than carefully reading the NT-install-docs (http://www.freebsd.org/~kevlo/postgres/

[GENERAL] PostgreSQL Use Report

2001-07-12 Thread Shaw Terwilliger
Just thought I'd drop a note to the PostgreSQL developers to let them know PostgreSQL is powering GoAmerica's newly released Go.Messenger system (http://www.goamerica.net/gomessenger/). Go.Messenger is an instant messaging solution for the RIM wireless Internet handheld device platform, and is Y

Re: [GENERAL] Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU?

2001-07-12 Thread snpe
> Another factor, not under our control, is that if the shared memory > region gets too large the kernel may decide to swap out portions of > it that haven't been touched lately. This of course is completely > counterproductive, especially if what gets swapped is a dirty buffer, > which'll event

[GENERAL] locale per db / table / column

2001-07-12 Thread Ben-Nes Michael
Hi All I'm a new Postgres User and because I'm from Israel I use the Hebrew set in locale. from reading the documents I realized that all the databases created under directory that was created with initdb while locale was set to something will be sorted by this locale with no way to set it to ot

Re: [GENERAL] Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU?

2001-07-12 Thread Tom Lane
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In my testing with *particluar* environment (Linux kernel 2.2.x, > pgbench), it was indicated that too many shared buffers reduced the > performance even though there was lots of memory, say 1GB. I'm not > sure why, but I suspect there is a siginificant o

Re: [GENERAL] View prevents index

2001-07-12 Thread Tom Lane
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It's not immediately obvious to me that these are equivalent, or >> perhaps I should say it's not clear under what conditions is the >> transformation legitimate. > Could you tell me in what cases two of above are not equivalent? It may well be OK, I j

Re: [GENERAL] Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)

2001-07-12 Thread wsheldah
The list looks fantastic. I'm now looking forward to this release. Sounds like it's planned for just 6-9 months after the 7.1 release, or thereabouts? Good agressive schedule. I would like to request one more feature of course: support for ALTER TABLE tablename MODIFY columnname [create cla

Re: [GENERAL] 2 gig file size limit

2001-07-12 Thread markMLl . pgsql-general
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > What the limit on NT? I'm told 2^64 bytes. Frankly, I'd be surprised if MS has tested it :-) -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] ---(end of

Re: [GENERAL] 2 gig file size limit

2001-07-12 Thread markMLl . pgsql-general
Marco Colombo wrote: > BTW, the document contains some limits. FS size limit is reported to be > 2TB (block-device size limit). I don't know if it applies to LVM logical > volumes. Ext2 FS size limit is 16TB (for 4kB blocks FS). You need to put > some effort to place 16TB on a single FS. Thanks