Jenny schrieb:
I'm running PostgreSQL 8.0.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu (Fedora Core 2). I've been
dealing with Psql for over than 2 years now, but I've never had this case
before.
I have a table that has about 20 rows in it.
Table public.s_apotik
Column | Type
In the absence of replies (and sorry to bombard the list), I should
clarify my question:
Is it OK to use logical volume management to run an xfs partition
hosting postgres data?
(The server specs are below.)
Thanks for any replies.
Rory
On 05/12/05, Rory Campbell-Lange ([EMAIL
I run the VACUUM as you suggested, but still no response from the server. So, I
decided to DROP the database. I got a message that the database is being used.
I closed every application that accessing it. But, the message remains.
I checked the server processes (ps -ax). There were lots of
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:41:55AM +, Rory Campbell-Lange [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it OK to use logical volume management to run an xfs partition
hosting postgres data?
We use just that and it works splendid. It's very nice for adding space
and all that.
But I must admit that
Rich Doughty wrote:
can anyone explain the reason for the difference in the
following 2 query plans, or offer any advice? the two queries
are identical apart from the limit clause.
[snip]
fwiw, join order makes no difference here either. i get a slightly
different plan, but with LIMIT 1
Please Unsubscribe.
We are in the process of upgrading our 400GB database from PostgreSQL
7.4.7 to 8.1.0. During the pg_restore I noticed that the autovacuum
process was slowing things down significantly. I should have disabled it
in postgresql.conf before starting the restore (duh).
Not wanting to restart the
Jenny wrote:
I'm running PostgreSQL 8.0.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu (Fedora Core 2). I've been
dealing with Psql for over than 2 years now, but I've never had this case
before.
Then I try to run the query from the psql shell. For example, the table has
obat_id : A, B, C, D.
db=# UPDATE s_apotik
Hi Zlatko,
I shall give this a try later and let you know how I get on. Thank you
for responding.
Howard.
Zlatko Matic wrote:
Have you tried to restore just schema first, then data?
Greetings,
Zlatko
Hi everyone, I have a problem with corrupt UTF-8 sequences in my
8.0.4 dump which is
Hello!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Howard Cole
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2005 13:41
An: 'PgSql General'
Betreff: Re: [GENERAL] Unicode Corruption and upgrading to
8.0.4. to 8.1
Hi everyone, I have a problem
Richard Huxton wrote:
Rich Doughty wrote:
This one goes nuts and doesn't return. is there any way i can
force a query plan similar to the one above?
EXPLAIN SELECT _t.* FROM
tokens.ta_tokens _t INNER JOIN
tokens.ta_tokens_stock _s ON _t.token_id = _s.token_id
WHERE
Rich Doughty wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Rich Doughty wrote:
[snip]
Try the same query but with a low retailer_id (100 or something) and
see if it goes a lot quicker. If that is what the problem is, try
changing the ORDER BY to something like _s.retailer_id, _t.value,
_t.number and see
Trent,
although I cannot contribute much of anything to your line
of thought I'd encourage you to keep on with it as it'd be
highly desirable (for GNUmed at least) to have a stronger/
more encompassing inheritance solution in PostgreSQL.
Karsten,
GNUmed developer
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @
Thanks Markus,
I am avoiding this solution at the moment since the database contains
binary (ByteA) fields aswell as text fields and I am unsure what iconv
would do to this data. If Zlatko's method does not work then I shall see
if I can programmatically use libiconv for all the relevant
Richard van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are in the process of upgrading our 400GB database from PostgreSQL
7.4.7 to 8.1.0. During the pg_restore I noticed that the autovacuum
process was slowing things down significantly. I should have disabled it
in postgresql.conf before starting
Hi!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Howard Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2005 15:38
An: Markus Wollny
Cc: PgSql General
Betreff: Re: [GENERAL] Unicode Corruption and upgrading to
8.0.4. to 8.1
I am avoiding this solution at the moment since the
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06-12-2005
15:49:28:
Couldn't you have just set autovacuum = off in postgresql.conf? (Unlike
some other things, this setting can be changed after postmaster start.)
If that is true, the documentation at
Richard van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06-12-2005 15:49:28:
Couldn't you have just set autovacuum = off in postgresql.conf? (Unlike
some other things, this setting can be changed after postmaster start.)
If that is true, the documentation at
am 06.12.2005, um 17:56:20 +0530 mailte Karthik.S folgendes:
Dear all,
I am using postgres version: 7.1.3 in Red hat linux : 7.2.
Uuhhh, 7.1 is out of lifetime. You should update!
I am having a script (uses psql) which drops and creates a database by
logging
into
Hi!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Karthik.S
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2005 13:26
An: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Betreff: [GENERAL] error in creating database
Dear all,
I am using postgres version:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (surabhi.ahuja) writes:
is there any way by which i can specify : to reserve x GB amount of
space to this database (this x includes all the space which the
database will require space for data files, indexes or any other
resources).
I believe that is part of the intent of
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06-12-2005
16:07:41:
That documentation is exactly correct. Note that it doesn't
say can
only be set at server start full stop.
That's a very suttle difference, but you are right
of couse. It's the word 'only' that threw me off. In my mind, it should
read:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 08:47, Emil Rachovsky wrote:
I am trying to find the equivalent of these two
Sybase system columns :
check_on_commit (Y/N) - Indicates whether INSERT and
UPDATE commands should wait until the next COMMIT
command to check if foreign keys are valid. A foreign
Emil Rachovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to find the equivalent of these two
Sybase system columns :
check_on_commit (Y/N) - Indicates whether INSERT and
UPDATE commands should wait until the next COMMIT
command to check if foreign keys are valid.
I think you are looking for
I'm using 8.1 on XP.
Server disk becomes full during running ANALYSE command.
The following lines are in log file
2005-12-06 18:29:10 ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint
pg_statistic_relid_att_index
2005-12-06 18:30:23 LOG: autovacuum: processing database postgres
2005-12-06
Andrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm using 8.1 on XP.
Server disk becomes full during running ANALYSE command.
...
Should I fix something or can I continue to use this cluster normally ?
Everything should be OK once you clean off some disk space.
Let us know if you see any evidence that it's
Hi there,
Patch for ltree (all releases since 7.3) is available
http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/patches/_ltree.patch
and from CVS. It fixes problem with unoptimal tree construction and big size
of index. Thanks Lexa Tutubalin for test suite and persistency.
Regards,
Hi,
I'm about to start a new project where the first task is to design a
database. I'm looking for some tool that will allow me to model the
tables and relationships graphically, UML or similar, and then let me
generate the SQL with PostgreSQL flavor. What's the best tools out
there? Are
Thread 1 does 1+ inserts into Table A and 1 update of Table B in a
single transaction.
This thread runs on demand.
Thread 2 does 1+ inserts into Table C in a separate transaction. This
thread runs once an hour.
There are no foreign key constraints from/to A or B to/from C. The
default
I wrote a little app that does basically what you're looking for:
http://www.hardgeus.com/projects/pgdesigner/
It's not professional quality, and is a little flaky, but it gets the
job done. It has a wxGTK dependency, and of course postgres. Your best
bet for running it is to pull it from
Brian Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are no foreign key constraints from/to A or B to/from C.
How sure are you of that? FK conflicts are much the most common reason
for unexpected deadlocks in pre-8.1 PG releases.
2005-12-02 15:04:46,773 [TP-Processor8] INFO
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
I'm about to start a new project where the first task is to design a
database. I'm looking for some tool that will allow me to model the tables
and relationships graphically, UML or similar, and then let me generate the
SQL with PostgreSQL flavor.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
| Hi,
| I'm about to start a new project where the first task is to design a
| database. I'm looking for some tool that will allow me to model the
| tables and relationships graphically, UML or similar, and then let me
|
Brian Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thread 1 does 1+ inserts into Table A and 1 update of Table B in a single
transaction.
This thread runs on demand.
Thread 2 does 1+ inserts into Table C in a separate transaction. This thread
runs once an hour.
I suspect you'll have to include more
I recommend Clay (http://www.azzurri.jp/en/software/clay/index.jsp).
It requires a JRE + Eclipse (as it is an eclipse plugin), but it is really nice
to work with and has built-in support for PostgreSQL DDL generation.
/Mikael
---(end of
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 12:58, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Hi,
I'm about to start a new project where the first task is to design a
database. I'm looking for some tool that will allow me to model the
tables and relationships graphically, UML or similar, and then let me
generate the SQL with
Carlos Correia wrote on 06.12.2005 21:13:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
| Hi,
| I'm about to start a new project where the first task is to design a
| database. I'm looking for some tool that will allow me to model the
| tables and relationships
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
| Carlos Correia wrote on 06.12.2005 21:13:
|
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Thomas Hallgren wrote:
| | Hi,
| | I'm about to start a new project where the first task is to design a
| | database. I'm
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 10:15:04AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Francesco Formenti - TVBLOB S.r.l. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a problem about deadlock. I have several stored procedures; only
one of them uses ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK on a table; however, all the
stored procedures can access
Dear all,
I have two questions: fist of all, is there any
function in pg like oracle's rownum?
secondly, I wonder how it is possible to let a
function return a dataset with different columns instead ofa single,
complex, one.
create table foo (a int, b int);
insert into foo (a,b) values
A.j. Langereis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem I am facing is that I will execute this function as part of =
another query where the parameter will be one of the columns of another =
table. Something like: select bar.*, get_a_foo(c) from bar. I need the =
result set to be like a table,
I assume Teodor just applied this patch to the proper branches.
---
Oleg Bartunov wrote:
Hi there,
Patch for ltree (all releases since 7.3) is available
http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/patches/_ltree.patch
test=# select c,(ff).* from (select bar.*,get_a_foo(c) as ff from bar) b;
c | a | b
---+---+---
1 | 1 | 2
(1 row)
Tanks! that works great! It managed to get it even a bit more simplified:
select bar.*, (get_a_foo(c)).* from bar;
Not amazingly elegant, but it works. Note that you need
Hi,
I have a table where I store changes made to an order. The looks like
ProdID, ChangeDate, Change1, Change2, ... etc.
Some ProdIDs have multiple records.
Is there an easy way to delete all records of a ProdID except the most
recent (ChangeDate is timestamp) one? Preferably in one SQL
On 12/7/05, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a table where I store changes made to an order. The looks likeProdID, ChangeDate, Change1, Change2, ... etc.Some ProdIDs have multiple records.Is there an easy way to delete all records of a ProdID except the most
recent (ChangeDate is timestamp)
Thank you,Tom,
As for the description of 'nulls' I have taken it as
it is from the Sybase help file :)
__
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
---(end of
On Dec 7, 2005, at 16:21 , Alex wrote:
Is there an easy way to delete all records of a ProdID except the
most recent (ChangeDate is timestamp) one? Preferably in one SQL
statement?
Here's one way to do it, though not it one SQL statement:
create table copy_of_original_table as
select
hi
jus recently there were some thread on postgresql list with people asying : i have 700 columns, i have 1000 columns and so on.
some people, imediatelly responded: change your schema.
this is what forced to me ask:
i have a situation where i ahve to store a number of objects in database.
all
Those parameters are specified when you declare the
foreign key. Look here,
in the section describing references:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-createtable.html
Luca
Thank you,Luca
I know that these parameters are specified when you
declare the foreign key, but i
am 07.12.2005, um 18:21:25 +1100 mailte Alex folgendes:
Hi,
I have a table where I store changes made to an order. The looks like
ProdID, ChangeDate, Change1, Change2, ... etc.
Some ProdIDs have multiple records.
Is there an easy way to delete all records of a ProdID except the most
Thanks ,
this one works beautifully.
Alex
PS: also thanks to the other suggestions, have a look at this one
hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
On 12/7/05, *Alex* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a table where I store changes made to an order. The looks like
DELECT FROM table
WHERE (ProdID,ChangeDate) not in
(SELECT ProdID,MAX(ChangeDate) FROM table
GROUP BY ProdID)
I hope this works.
On 12/7/05, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a table where I store changes made to an order. The looks like
ProdID, ChangeDate, Change1, Change2, ... etc.
Postgresql supports records in the where clause i.e. you can compare
multiple columns simultaneously:
test=# delete from change where id || ':' || datum not in (select id ||
':' || max(datum) from change group by id order by 1);
could therefore be rewritten to:
delete from change where (id,
53 matches
Mail list logo
