Installing with yum, Fedora core 5. Get error: could
not open file global/pg_database: No such file or
directory. The file exists however, in
/var/lib/pgsql/data/global and contains 3 lines:
postgres 10793 1663 499 499
template 1 1663 499 499
template0 10792 1663 499 499
From the
I've been reading about locales, encodings, sort orders, the to_ascii
function and, embarrasingly, I'm more confused than enlightened.:
What I want is very simple:
1) I want the database to correctly accept, store, and display
alphabetic characters, including European accented characters, in
FC5. Using yum (which downloaded a few addition dependencies in the process) to install: postgresqlpostgresql-serverpostgresql-libspostgresql-docspostgresql-contribpostgresql-jdbdpostgresql-odbcpostgresql-pl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /sbin/chkconfig postgresql on[EMAIL
Hi Michael
Yes - Multiple rows of the same data are created in each secondary table.
I have two triggers that are identical in format although handling different
tables. One is triggeres after insert and with this there is no multiplying
factor.
The other is triggered after an update.
Both
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-08-19 20:18:53 -0700:
Installing with yum, Fedora core 5. Get error: could
not open file global/pg_database: No such file or
directory. The file exists however, in
/var/lib/pgsql/data/global and contains 3 lines:
postgres 10793 1663 499 499
template 1 1663
Is there a trick to make this work a bit faster?
We have a number of views that join tables, and we have queries that
join those views. Some relatively large tables are involved.
We added indexes that match our query constraints as much as possible,
and that does work if we explicitly query
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
For example, with all LC_* parameters set to "en_US.UTF8", I get the
following incorrect "order:by":
Barn
Bcancour
Beaupr
Did you initdb with locale en_US.UTF8, and also createdb with encoding
UTF8? While you can certainly choose mismatching values
Jim Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Installing with yum, Fedora core 5. Get error: could
not open file global/pg_database: No such file or
directory.
It seems pretty odd that that would be the first error.
The file exists however, in
/var/lib/pgsql/data/global and contains 3 lines:
OK
Alban Hertroys wrote:
We have a number of views that join tables, and we have queries that
join those views. Some relatively large tables are involved.
We added indexes that match our query constraints as much as possible,
and that does work if we explicitly query the tables with all the
I have an ON INSERT DO INSTEAD rule that calls a function to do the
insert (via SELECT myfunction(...)). How do I set the number returned
by PQcmdTuples?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list
Alban Hertroys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a trick to make this work a bit faster?
Have you really shown us the right queries for those explain results?
I don't see where the second plan is testing dir 1 at all.
It looks like the first one is faster because it's using a partial
index
John D. Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anecdotally, I had a situation recently where I got different plans
depending on whether I queried a join of a view against itself, or
macro expanded the view by hand. I was =very= surprised at this.
Me too, at least if you didn't do any hand
Also, what is you $PGDATA variable pointing to? Issue:
env | grep PG
see what that comes out with.
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-08-19 20:18:53 -0700:
Installing with yum, Fedora core 5. Get error: could
not open file global/pg_database: No such file or
directory.
Tom Lane wrote:
Anecdotally, I had a situation recently where I got different plans
depending on whether I queried a join of a view against itself, or
macro expanded the view by hand. I was =very= surprised at this.
Me too, at least if you didn't do any hand optimization but just stuck
the
Alban Hertroys alban ( at ) magproductions ( dot ) nl writes: Is there a trick to make this work a bit faster?
Have you really shown us the right queries for those explain results?I don't see where the second plan is testing dir 1 at all.It looks like the first one is faster because it's using a
DelGurth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As you can see we tried some indexes, to see if we could
get the queries on the views to become faster.
Indexes:
mm_insrel_table_pkey PRIMARY KEY, btree (number)
mm_insrel_dir_not_one_idx btree (dnumber, snumber) WHERE dir 1
The technique for a single part gapless sequence and a two-part gapless
sequence has been published today at http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits.
I'd be interested to hear of high concurrency usage that would break it
or be notably slow.
--elein
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end
I would like to analyze server stats offline, so I attempt to pg_dump my
production database and then pg_restore it into another database. In the
process all stats seem to be reset (they are not completely zeroed). So
in production I have a table with the following stats (from
pg_stat_all_tables
I remember recently someone posted a script to get an 8.1 system to act
as a standby system. The way it worked was the recovery command looped
waiting for more WAL files.
However, I can't seem to find this script anymore. Does someone have a
link to it?
I know 8.2 will have a nicer system, but
BTW, what PG version is this exactly?Our PG version is the version downloadable from
http://www.sunfreeware.com/programlistsparc10.html#postgresql , so 8.0.1 for solaris sparc.Sorry I was wrong on this point, it's 8.1.4-bash-3.00$ pg_config --versionPostgreSQL
8.1.4And it's the version from
On 8/21/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmph ... it certainly appears to be choosing the wrong index in thesecond case.I wonder why --- can you show the relpages and reltuplesstats from pg_class for these indexes?I'm personally not aware how to do that, perhaps Alban will (tell me how to) do
elein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The technique for a single part gapless sequence and a two-part gapless
sequence has been published today at http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits.
I'd be interested to hear of high concurrency usage that would break it
or be notably slow.
--elein
[EMAIL
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:27:58AM -0700, Bob Pawley wrote:
Yes - Multiple rows of the same data are created in each secondary table.
I have two triggers that are identical in format although handling
different tables. One is triggeres after insert and with this there is no
multiplying
DelGurth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 8/21/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be interesting also to examine the output of just
explain select * from mm_insrel_table where dnumber=558332 and dir1
with different subsets of these indexes in place.
Ok. Did that (with your trick,
Hi,
I am just trying to connect to a Postgresql DB using a Perl cgi script
from a web page from my own computer on a remote network.
I am using Postgresql 8.1.4 on Fedora Core 5 with a Linux firewall that
allows all traffic.
Postmaster is running with -i and I tried different -h (including
Bernard Miville [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am just trying to connect to a Postgresql DB using a Perl cgi script
from a web page from my own computer on a remote network.
I am using Postgresql 8.1.4 on Fedora Core 5 with a Linux firewall that
allows all traffic.
Given that it's a permission
Hi Tom,
It now works!
I hate SELinux, it always cause me problems.
Any suggestion on how to make SELinux happy without having to turn it off.
Thanks,
Bernard
Tom Lane wrote:
Bernard Miville [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am just trying to connect to a Postgresql DB using a Perl cgi script
Bernard Miville [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It now works!
I hate SELinux, it always cause me problems.
It's still got a lot of rough edges, for sure, but I think the idea is
sound. (And I'm not just saying that because I work for Red Hat ...
just look at all the fun Windows users are having
Instead of adding an FAQ entry, which might not be found when the error
is generated, I added a HINT for 8.2 that will appear with the error
message:
errmsg(invalid byte sequence for encoding \%s\: 0x%s,
pg_enc2name_tbl[encoding].name,
John Gray wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 14:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
John Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is the reason why xpath_table allows you to specify an
identifying field (usually a primary key but doesn't have to be)- the
solution to your question is to join an xpath_table
I'm considering using a UUID as a primary / foreign key for my schema,
to help ensure portability of data in a multi-master context. Does
anyone have experience with this?
There's a project on Gborg (pguuid) to create a native UUID type, but
it looks stagnant (and I'd prefer to use PostgreSQL
31 matches
Mail list logo
