On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:50:22PM +0530, Anoo Sivadasan Pillai wrote:
> I am using "PostgreSQL 8.2.4 on i686-pc-mingw32, compiled by GCC
> gcc.exe (GCC) 3.4.2 (mingw-special)" on Windows 2003 server
>
> While I am trying to update a prmary key It is failing with the
> following message "ERROR:
On 9/26/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> regression=# set timezone to 'Pacific/Auckland';
> SET
> regression=# select '2007-10-01 06:12:40.097244+12'::timestamptz;
> timestamptz
> ---
> 2007-10-01 07:12:40.097244+13
> (1 row)
>
> What have you got "
"Mike C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just upgraded from Postgres 8.1.0 to 8.1.10 to update the NZ
> timezone changes, but it doesn't seem to make a difference (I've also
> patched linux). Ideas?
Hm, works for me:
Welcome to psql 8.1.10, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal.
Type: \copyrig
On Sep 25, 2007, at 21:44 , Tom Lane wrote:
... which in English means we just do the calculation once ...
As always, thanks, Tom, for the explanation (and Alvaro, who probably
already knew this :))
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
---(end of broadcast)--
Hi,
I've just upgraded from Postgres 8.1.0 to 8.1.10 to update the NZ
timezone changes, but it doesn't seem to make a difference (I've also
patched linux). Ideas?
Below is how I'm testing (artificially set time into future):
-bash-3.1$ date
Mon Oct 1 07:12:36 NZDT 2007
-bash-3.1$ psql test
Welc
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe you'd have to write it like
> select dom_id, dom_name, count(usr_dom_id) as usr_count
>from domains
>join users on (usr_dom_id = dom_id)
>having count(usr_dom_id) > 0
>order by dom_name;
> I don't know how the performance
On Sep 25, 2007, at 17:30 , Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
select dom_id,
dom_name,
usr_count
from domains
natural join (select usr_dom_id as dom_id,
count(usr_dom_id) as usr_count
from users) u
where usr_count > 0
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2007, at 16:59 , Madison Kelly wrote:
>
>> SELECT
>> d.dom_id,
>> d.dom_name,
>> (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM users u WHERE u.usr_dom_id=d.dom_id)
>> AS
>> usr_count
>> FROM
>> domains d
>> WHERE
>> (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM users u W
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Gregory Stark wrote:
I'm surprised you don't start by suggesting lowering bgwriter_delay for a busy
dedicated system. Does it cause too much wasted cpu work in the "all" cycle in
8.2?
I've just found it easier to sort through this class of problem by getting
the maxpages
On Sep 25, 2007, at 16:59 , Madison Kelly wrote:
SELECT
d.dom_id,
d.dom_name,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM users u WHERE u.usr_dom_id=d.dom_id)
AS
usr_count
FROM
domains d
WHERE
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM users u WHERE u.usr_dom_id=d.dom_id) > 0
ORDER
On 9/25/07, Morris Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But since it hit all of your machines, and at about the same time, I
> > tend to think that someone did something to these machines that caused
> > this issue, and it's not a 7.4.x pro
Hi all,
I've read 7.2.1.3 (as short as it is) in the PgSQL docs, but don't
see what I am doing wrong... Maybe you can help?
I've got a query;
SELECT
d.dom_id,
d.dom_name,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM users u WHERE u.usr_dom_id=d.dom_id)
AS
usr_count
FROM
On 9/25/07, Ralph Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where should I start looking for sources of the error?
See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/backup.html#BACKUP-DUMP-ALL
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free
"Morris Goldstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We've recovered. There is root cause analysis going on. The question is
> whether I can use an argument about 8.0 vs. 7.4 reliability from this fiasco
> to help us get to 8.0.
> 8.0 actually is more reliable than 7.4, I assume.
I don't know that I'd
In preparing to upgrade, (a long story), of our version 7.4 database
cluster,
I'm trying pg_restore using the file from pg_dumpall, also version 7.4
into a virgin install of PostgreSQL 7.4 on Ubuntu.
Postmaster is up and running (c/o ps -ef)
The error I get:
pg_restore: [archiver] input file do
Marc Munro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am puzzled by the cascade and restrict options to the alter domain
> drop constraint command.
They don't do anything.
I think they were put in because we have this meme that the SQL spec
requires RESTRICT/CASCADE options on every type of DROP, but so far
Steve Crawford wrote:
> Sysadmin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm finding that routinely when I try to reload a database on a server
>> where I know there are no connections to a given DB I get the error:
>>
>> $ dropdb foo && createdb foo -O bar && psql foo -f /path/to/db.out
>> dropdb: database remo
On 9/25/07, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But since it hit all of your machines, and at about the same time, I
> tend to think that someone did something to these machines that caused
> this issue, and it's not a 7.4.x problem.
I'm sure it is pilot error, and we're still trying to
"Greg Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
>
>> name | setting | unit
>> ---+---+
>> bgwriter_all_maxpages | 5 |
>> bgwriter_all_percent | 0.333 | [null]
>> bgwriter_delay
On 9/25/07, Morris Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your help with pg_resetxlog. It recovered all of our databases,
> and it looks like we got lucky in that no updates were lost.
>
> We are deciding on the goals for our next release, and one of the issues on
> the table is an upgra
I am puzzled by the cascade and restrict options to the alter domain
drop constraint command.
I do not see how a dropping a check constraint should cascade to
anything, or indeed be restricted by anything.
My reasoning is simple: if I drop a check constraint on a domain, no
data should be affecte
Thanks for your help with pg_resetxlog. It recovered all of our databases,
and it looks like we got lucky in that no updates were lost.
We are deciding on the goals for our next release, and one of the issues on
the table is an upgrade to postgres 8. Can you comment on the improvements
in performa
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:39 -0400, David Siebert wrote:
> I am using CentOS 5 and would like to update to 8.2.5. Does anyone
> know of a repository that carries it? RedHat 5 should work as well.
I am about to create a yum repository for PGDG RPMs. The infrastructure
is ready, but I have som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am using CentOS 5 and would like to update to 8.2.5. Does anyone know
of a repository that carries it? RedHat 5 should work as well.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://eni
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
name | setting | unit
---+---+
bgwriter_all_maxpages | 5 |
bgwriter_all_percent | 0.333 | [null]
bgwriter_delay| 200 | ms
bgwriter_lru_maxpages | 5 |
b
On 9/25/07, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/9/25, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 9/24/07, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 2007/9/25, Rhys Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > yes indeed. thats exactly it scott!!!
> > > >
> > > > On 9/24/07, Scott Marlowe <[
On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:37 , Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
You might need to use adddepend, which is a contrib module
included in 8.1
(not 8.2 AIUI). (Perhaps 8.2 includes this functionality in core?
You can
probably check the release notes for 8.2 for details.)
Not in
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2007, at 9:00 , David Siebert wrote:
>> Any suggestions on what the command line should look like?
>
> You might need to use adddepend, which is a contrib module included in 8.1
> (not 8.2 AIUI). (Perhaps 8.2 includes this functionality in core? You can
>
On Sep 25, 2007, at 9:00 , David Siebert wrote:
I have a very old postgres server that I am trying to move the data
off
of. It is running 7.1 and has been trouble free for 6 plus years.
I am trying to move the data base off to a server running 8.1.
In my opinion you should look at 8.2, not
Dan99 escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I found out this morning that I cannot get pg_dump to work at all on
> my database. It refuses to create a dump and instead just freezes.
> When using the verbose option (-v) i get the following output and then
> it stops (it at one point ran for days on end before i eve
On Sep 25, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Kevin Kempter wrote:
Hi List;
I have a few basic troubleshooting questions...
1) If I have autovacuum turned on, how do I know which table is
being vacuumed when in pg_stat_activity I only see VACUUM?
I've been using this query but it doesn't always work...
On 9/18/07, Dan99 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found out this morning that I cannot get pg_dump to work at all on
> my database. It refuses to create a dump and instead just freezes.
> When using the verbose option (-v) i get the following output and then
> it stops (it at one point ran
Hi List;
I have a few basic troubleshooting questions...
1) If I have autovacuum turned on, how do I know which table is being vacuumed
when in pg_stat_activity I only see VACUUM?
I've been using this query but it doesn't always work... is there a better way?
CREATE Temp table tmp_p as
SELECT
I have a very old postgres server that I am trying to move the data off
of. It is running 7.1 and has been trouble free for 6 plus years.
I am trying to move the data base off to a server running 8.1.
I have managed to back up the data using PG_Dump using like this.
" pg_dump -b -Fc -h stan.somepla
2007/9/25, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 9/24/07, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/9/25, Rhys Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > yes indeed. thats exactly it scott!!!
> > >
> > > On 9/24/07, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 9/24/07, Pavel Stehule <[EMAI
On 9/24/07, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/9/25, Rhys Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > yes indeed. thats exactly it scott!!!
> >
> > On 9/24/07, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9/24/07, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hello Rhys
> > > >
> > > > it
Josh Harrison escribió:
> Hello,
> I have a question in the postgres document chapter 34. Rules and Command
> Status.
> The last paragraph of that page says that
>
> "The programmer can ensure that any desired INSTEAD rule is the one that
> sets the command status in the second case, by giving it
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:58 +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> hi,
> our system is handling between 600 and 2000 transactions per second. all
> of them are very small, very fast. typical query runs in under 1ms.
> yes - sometimes we get queries that take longer than then should get.
> simple
Hello,
I have a question in the postgres document chapter 34. Rules and Command
Status.
The last paragraph of that page says that
"The programmer can ensure that any desired INSTEAD rule is the one that
sets the command status in the second case, by giving it the alphabetically
last rule name amon
It's normal behaviour, because after the first update it will be 2 same values
for m2 and you don't want that since you have a unique constraint for that
column. try this:
CREATE TABLE master ( m1 INT primary key , m2 int unique ) ;
INSERT INTO master VALUES ( 1, 1 ) ;
INSERT INTO master VA
- Original Message -
From: Ashish Karalkar
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PgpoolAdmin installation
I got the answer for the same and is sloved it is just a file which gives
information about the php installations.
I have verified
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:51:54AM -0400, Paul Tilles wrote:
> ECPGis_informix_null
>
> ECPGset_informix_null
>
> In 8.2.4, I do not see these functions. Instead, I see functions
>
> ECPGis_noind_null
>
> ECPGset_noind_null
>
> Are they functionally the same?
Yes. The 7.4 version had some naming
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:53 +0530, Ashish Karalkar wrote:
> "step 5 ) It accesses install/phpinfo.php from Web a browser. It is
> confirmed that the function of php_mstring and php_pgsql is effective.
> a.. "Multibyte Support" is "enabled".
> b.. "PostgreSQL Support" is "enabled". "
>
>
hi,
our system is handling between 600 and 2000 transactions per second. all
of them are very small, very fast. typical query runs in under 1ms.
yes - sometimes we get queries that take longer than then should get.
simple check shows that we have a very visible pattern of
every-5-minutes peak.
in t
Thanks for your replay,
Previously I have installed pgpool and trying to install pgpoolAdmin.
Now I have installed pgpool-II and that problem is sloved.
Now I am facing another problem in installation document it is said ;
"step 5 ) It accesses install/phpinfo.php from Web a browser. It is
c
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> 2) how can I speed it up? by using indexes? or by changing the query?
Note that NOT IN cannot be optimised in the same way as NOT EXISTS due
to the different ways they handle NULL. In particular if the subquery
of the NOT IN produc
Alban Hertroys ha scritto:
> Ottavio Campana wrote:
>> 2) how can I speed it up? by using indexes? or by changing the query?
>
> Do you have indices on mytable.id and copy_mytable.id?
> Does using NOT EXISTS get you any better results?
Eventually I had to select not all the table fields but only
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:57 +0530, Ashish Karalkar wrote:
> can anybody please tell me what is this PCP and PCP directory, I dont
> have that one on my box,do i have to install this pcp package and if
> yes please point me to the link?
Did you install pgpool-II ?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 04:55:37AM -0200, Petri Simolin wrote:
> I have created a function which inserts a row in a table which has 2 unique
> indexes on two different columns.
>
> I am wondering, if there is a way in case of UNIQUE_VIOLATION exception to
> find out which index would have been vio
Dear list member,
I am trying to install pgpooladmin tool and the documantation talks about
following parameter
pcp_attach_node command pass /usr/local/bin/pcp_attach_node
pcp_detach_node command pass /usr/local/bin/pcp_detach_node
pcp_node_count command pass /usr/local/bin/
On 25/09/2007, Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How can I remove characters that form a part of regular expressions?
>
> Why do you want to do that?
Because these values were inserted into the DB due to a faulty
application. So cleansing was called for.
I just ended up doing it with r
51 matches
Mail list logo
