Re: [GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread Tomasz Ostrowski
On 2008-03-31 21:16, mark wrote: > is the query I am running , and it takes over 10 seconds to complete > this query... > update users set number_recieved=number_recieved+1 where > uid=738889333; Every time or only sometimes? If it is sometimes then I think this query is waiting for a checkpoin

Re: [GENERAL] Installing support for python on windows

2008-03-31 Thread juan_carlos
Hello, I have the same problem. I've checked plpython.dll dependencies with depends tool and all is correct. I tried to install plperl with no success. What can I do? Magnus Hagander-2 wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:15:38PM -0500, Rhys Stewart wrote: >> >> >> Ok so i am having troub

Re: [GENERAL] Using tables in other PostGreSQL database

2008-03-31 Thread Pettis, Barry
Wow seems like this post took on a life of it's own. All I wanted to do was to be able to use a table that someone else has all ready created. Seems like somewhere someone mentioned a DBA ( which I'm assuming to be "Database Administrator" ) well as far as I know we don't have one though I wish we

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Connection to PostgreSQL Using Certificate: Wrong Permissions on Private Key File

2008-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
"korry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmmm... I'm not crazy about libpq printing error messages to stderr. Me neither, feel free to submit a patch. The basic problem here is that the obvious fix involves feeding the message to a PQnoticeProcessor callback, but these messages occur during connec

Re: [GENERAL] Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)

2008-03-31 Thread Stephen Frost
* F. Jovan Jester ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > 1. a - old notation > 2. a > 3. e & d > 4. b & c *blink* hmm. How about 1 and 2? (is this an April fools joke?) Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [GENERAL] Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)

2008-03-31 Thread F. Jovan Jester
1. a - old notation 2. a 3. e & d 4. b & c -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Re: [GENERAL] Check if table or View exists

2008-03-31 Thread Jorge Godoy
Em Monday 31 March 2008 22:35:01 Jeff Williams escreveu: > I am developing an application where I will have a default table and/or > view for a select statement for my application. If a client has a special > requirement I would like to have a alternate table of the same name in a > different sche

Re: [GENERAL] Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)

2008-03-31 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
1) What type of names do you prefer? --- b) new one with pg_ prefix - pg_createdb, pg_creteuser ... 2) How often do you use these tools? --- a) every day (e.g. in my cron) 3) What name of initdb do you prefer? --

[GENERAL] Check if table or View exists

2008-03-31 Thread Jeff Williams
I am developing an application where I will have a default table and/or view for a select statement for my application. If a client has a special requirement I would like to have a alternate table of the same name in a different schema with the change structure. Schema A Default table - coreta

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Connection to PostgreSQL Using Certificate: Wrong Permissions on Private Key File

2008-03-31 Thread korry
Now libpq doesn't have any provision for DETAIL or HINT in its locally-generated messages at the moment, so we can't just duplicate the backend message, but we could do something like this example from elsewhere in libpq: if (stat_buf.st_mode & (S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO)) { fprintf(std

Re: [GENERAL] GSoC Proposal: PL/Mono

2008-03-31 Thread Olexandr Melnyk
After some thinking, I decided it's better for me not to apply for SoC this year for personal reasons. On 3/29/08, Shane Ambler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Olexandr Melnyk wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm interested in applying for this year's GSoC program, to work on > PL/Mono: > > pluggable proc

Re: [GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread Raymond O'Donnell
On 31/03/2008 21:11, mark wrote: it says actual time is 0.161 seconds or milliseconds.. but the total run time is 11 seconds.. any ideas why this discrepancy? Well, I interpret the docs as implying that the difference between the time quoted in the top line of EXPLAIN ANALYZE's output and the

Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: bogus freespace amount

2008-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
"Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2008-03-31 13:35:12 10: FATAL: bogus freespace amount This probably means $PGDATA/global/pg_fsm.cache has gotten trashed. Fortunately that's just a cache --- you should be able to delete the file and start up. regards, tom

Re: [GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread mark
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Raymond O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31/03/2008 20:51, mark wrote: > > > can you explain what the numbers mean in the EXPLAIN ANALYZE? > > (cost=0.00..8.46 rows=1 width=1073) (actual time=0.094..0.161 rows=1 > > loops=1) > > As I understand it, "cost

[GENERAL] FATAL: bogus freespace amount

2008-03-31 Thread Carlos H. Reimer
Hi, We are facing the following problem during the PostgreSQL 8.2.4 startup in a Windows XP/SP2 box: 2008-03-31 13:35:12 1: LOG: database system was interrupted at 2008-03-31 09:45:44 2008-03-31 13:35:12 2: LOG: checkpoint record is at 0/7588FFD8 2008-03-31 13:35:12 3: LOG: redo record is

Re: [GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread mark
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Raymond O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31/03/2008 20:51, mark wrote: > > > can you explain what the numbers mean in the EXPLAIN ANALYZE? > > (cost=0.00..8.46 rows=1 width=1073) (actual time=0.094..0.161 rows=1 > > loops=1) > > It's worth reading throug

Re: [GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread Raymond O'Donnell
On 31/03/2008 20:51, mark wrote: can you explain what the numbers mean in the EXPLAIN ANALYZE? (cost=0.00..8.46 rows=1 width=1073) (actual time=0.094..0.161 rows=1 loops=1) It's worth reading through the docs at that reference in my previous email - it's well explained there. As I underst

Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.8030 (22 messages)

2008-03-31 Thread Rainer Bauer
Tom Lane wrote: >"Brett Hoerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I received eight of these unwanted digests last night and early this >>> morning, after never seeing them before. Is this a new configuration >>> change

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong

2008-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It looks like there's no trivial way to get ANALYZE to do things that >> way, though. heap_release_fetch() doesn't distinguish a DEAD line >> pointer from an unused or redirected

Re: [GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread mark
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Raymond O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31/03/2008 20:38, mark wrote: > > > EXPLAIN ANALYZE update users set number_recieved=number_recieved+1 where > > uid=738889333; > > QUERY PLAN > > > -

Re: [GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread Raymond O'Donnell
On 31/03/2008 20:38, mark wrote: EXPLAIN ANALYZE update users set number_recieved=number_recieved+1 where uid=738889333; QUERY PLAN ---

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB

2008-03-31 Thread Vivek Khera
On Mar 25, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Jeff Davis wrote: This obviously does not work in real time, but it may be useful. It does not require a lot of additional space to do this because of the ZFS copy-on-write implementation. But what benefit does it give you if you're pounding on the same set of

Re: [GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread Raymond O'Donnell
On 31/03/2008 20:38, mark wrote: I dont manually do vaccum.. It might be worth doing one and seeing if it makes a difference. Ray. --- Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread mark
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Raymond O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31/03/2008 20:16, mark wrote: > > is the query I am running , and it takes over 10 seconds to complete > > this query... > > > > > > update users set number_recieved=number_recieved+1 where uid=738889333; > > > > t

Re: [GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread Raymond O'Donnell
On 31/03/2008 20:16, mark wrote: is the query I am running , and it takes over 10 seconds to complete this query... update users set number_recieved=number_recieved+1 where uid=738889333; table has about 1.7 million rows.. i have an index on column uid and also on number_received. .. this is

[GENERAL] simple update queries take a long time - postgres 8.3.1

2008-03-31 Thread mark
is the query I am running , and it takes over 10 seconds to complete this query... update users set number_recieved=number_recieved+1 where uid=738889333; table has about 1.7 million rows.. i have an index on column uid and also on number_received. .. this is also slowing down the inserts that h

Re: [GENERAL] Can Postgres 8.x start if some disks containing tablespaces are not mounted?

2008-03-31 Thread Gurjeet Singh
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Morris Goldstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Suppose I have a database with $PGDATA on /dev/sda, and a tablespace > > directory on /dev/sdb. Will Postgres start successfully if /dev/sda is > > mounted and /dev/sdb is not

Re: [GENERAL] Very slow catalog query

2008-03-31 Thread Just Someone
Hi Tom, > Well, it's hard to be sure what the problem is when you're not showing > us a problem case ... but I notice that this indexscan is estimated > awfully high: Whenever I do it manually it works fast. But in the log I see lots of slow ones. Could it be caused by auto vacuum? Or by che

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong

2008-03-31 Thread Pavan Deolasee
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ Please see if you can stop using the "redirected dead" terminology ] > > Apologies, will keep that in mind. Seems like a hang-over from the past :-) > Yeah, I think I agree. The page pruning code is set up so that chan

Re: [GENERAL] Can Postgres 8.x start if some disks containing tablespaces are not mounted?

2008-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
"Morris Goldstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Suppose I have a database with $PGDATA on /dev/sda, and a tablespace > directory on /dev/sdb. Will Postgres start successfully if /dev/sda is > mounted and /dev/sdb is not? If not, why not? It will start, but you will have unpleasant failures when y

Re: [GENERAL] Can Postgres 8.x start if some disks containing tablespaces are not mounted?

2008-03-31 Thread Zdenek Kotala
Morris Goldstein napsal(a): Suppose I have a database with $PGDATA on /dev/sda, and a tablespace directory on /dev/sdb. Will Postgres start successfully if /dev/sda is mounted and /dev/sdb is not? If not, why not? It is not good idea to run PostgreSQL in your scenario. However PostgeSQL needs

Re: [GENERAL] Schema design question

2008-03-31 Thread Ben
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote: On 29/03/2008, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm working on a project which requires me to keep track of objects, each of which can have an arbitrary number of attributes. Although there will be many attributes that an object can have, the data ty

[GENERAL] Can Postgres 8.x start if some disks containing tablespaces are not mounted?

2008-03-31 Thread Morris Goldstein
Suppose I have a database with $PGDATA on /dev/sda, and a tablespace directory on /dev/sdb. Will Postgres start successfully if /dev/sda is mounted and /dev/sdb is not? If not, why not? Morris

Re: [GENERAL] Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)

2008-03-31 Thread Andrej Ricnik-Bay
On 01/04/2008, Steve Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One advantage of using a consistent prefix is that when you have > forgotten the exact name of a rarely used command and you are using a > shell with readline support, "pg_" will bring up a list of > available commands. For any value of

Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.8030 (22 messages)

2008-03-31 Thread Colin Wetherbee
Tom Lane wrote: "Brett Hoerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I received eight of these unwanted digests last night and early this morning, after never seeing them before. Is this a new configuration change that I need

Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.8030 (22 messages)

2008-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
"Brett Hoerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I received eight of these unwanted digests last night and early this >> morning, after never seeing them before. Is this a new configuration >> change that I need to go per

Re: [GENERAL] Schema design question

2008-03-31 Thread Andrej Ricnik-Bay
On 29/03/2008, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working on a project which requires me to keep track of objects, > each of which can have an arbitrary number of attributes. Although > there will be many attributes that an object can have, the data types > of those attributes won't be all tha

Re: [GENERAL] Very slow catalog query

2008-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
"Just Someone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here is the result of explain analyze (though this one took 1500ms and > not 169000): Well, it's hard to be sure what the problem is when you're not showing us a problem case ... but I notice that this indexscan is estimated awfully high: >

Re: [GENERAL] Very slow catalog query

2008-03-31 Thread Just Someone
Hi Tom, Here is the result of explain analyze (though this one took 1500ms and not 169000): On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Just Someone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Any ideas how to start finding the culprit? > > EXPLAIN ANALYZE? explain analyze SE

Re: [GENERAL] Primary Key with serial

2008-03-31 Thread x asasaxax
can anyone do a example for me.. an explain how it works? Thanks a lot 2008/3/29, Berend Tober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > x asasaxax wrote: > >I have the following tablecreate table product(cod serial, > user_cod > > bigint, constraint product_fk Foreign Key(user_cod) references > user(cod

Re: [GENERAL] Very slow catalog query

2008-03-31 Thread Just Someone
Hi, > I'm wondering... just 4GB of ram? > What's the "normal" "hammering" -- a.k.a. user access -- to all of this? > PG, as expected, launches a separate process for each connection. this eats > up > resources quite quickly > Did you check your system processes with 'top' ? how's it loo

Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.8030 (22 messages)

2008-03-31 Thread Brett Hoerner
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I received eight of these unwanted digests last night and early this > morning, after never seeing them before. Is this a new configuration > change that I need to go personalize? I was wondering the same thing, but

Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.8030 (22 messages)

2008-03-31 Thread Colin Wetherbee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message Digest Volume 1 : Issue 8030 : "index" Format Messages in this Issue: 200803/1324: Re: casting from integer to boolean 200803/1325: Re: casting from integer to boolean 200803/1326: Re: casting from integer to boolean 200803/1327: Re: Survey: renaming/r

Re: [GENERAL] Array operator "sum array values"

2008-03-31 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello On 31/03/2008, Scara Maccai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > is there a syntax that sums the values of an array? > > That is, having an array like > > {1,3,8},{5,6,7} > > something like > > select arr[1:2][2:3] > > gives > > {1,3},{6,7} > > > ; what I'd like is: > > select arr[1

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong

2008-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Seems like the redirected-dead line pointers are playing spoil-sport here. > In this particular example, the deleted tuples may get truncated to > redirected-dead line pointers. Analyze would report them as empty > slots and not as dead tuples. So in t

[GENERAL] Array operator "sum array values"

2008-03-31 Thread Scara Maccai
Hi, is there a syntax that sums the values of an array? That is, having an array like {1,3,8},{5,6,7} something like select arr[1:2][2:3] gives {1,3},{6,7} ; what I'd like is: select arr[1$2][2$3] gives: 17 (that is, 1+3 + 6+7) If there is no such operator, would it be complicated add

Re: [GENERAL] Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)

2008-03-31 Thread Steve Crawford
I've only been peripherally watching this thread and this may have been mentioned... One advantage of using a consistent prefix is that when you have forgotten the exact name of a rarely used command and you are using a shell with readline support, "pg_" will bring up a list of available comm

Re: [GENERAL] Very slow catalog query

2008-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
"Just Someone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any ideas how to start finding the culprit? EXPLAIN ANALYZE? What would be particularly interesting is to compare the results for fast and slow cases of the "same" query. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing li

Re: [GENERAL] Very slow catalog query

2008-03-31 Thread Pedro Doria Meunier
On Monday 31 March 2008 15:13:25 Just Someone wrote: > Hi, > > I have a DB with a large number schemas (around 10K) and a large > number of tables (400K). The app became slow lately, and logging the > slow queries, I see more than a few like this: > > SELECT: LOG: duration: 169547.424 ms statemen

[GENERAL] Very slow catalog query

2008-03-31 Thread Just Someone
Hi, I have a DB with a large number schemas (around 10K) and a large number of tables (400K). The app became slow lately, and logging the slow queries, I see more than a few like this: SELECT: LOG: duration: 169547.424 ms statement: SELECT attr.attname, name.nspname, seq.relname

Re: [GENERAL] Using tables in other PostGreSQL database

2008-03-31 Thread Roberts, Jon
> Also, 2PC is subject to unresolved transactions (or something like that). > > > > Even in Oracle you don't have cross db queries. > > > > On the contrary you do. You can refer to objects in another database by > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], very useful to mix local and remote data in no > > time. DB

Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline

2008-03-31 Thread Teodor Sigaev
The patch takes into account the corner case of overlap. Here is the code for that // start check if (!startHL && *currentpos >= startpos) startHL = 1; The headline generation will not start until currentpos has gone past startpos. Ok You can also check how this headline function is w

Re: [GENERAL] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong

2008-03-31 Thread Pavan Deolasee
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Stuart Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a table with about 15 million rows which is constantly having > tuples added to the head and deleted in blocks from the tail to maintain > the size. The dead tuple count in pg_stat_user_tables tracks the deleted >

Re: [GENERAL] postgreSQL multithreading

2008-03-31 Thread Roberts, Jon
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-general- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 10:13 AM > To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: [GENERAL] postgreSQL multithreading > > Hi all, > > I was trying to find some wa

[GENERAL] round() and cast to numeric

2008-03-31 Thread Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
I've some real around and some round as well. round() just accept dp and numeric. What' going to be the difference between casting to numeric and rounding? thx -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make ch

Re: [GENERAL] Removing redundant itemsets

2008-03-31 Thread Allan Kamau
Thanks, I have "reworded" the email (replaced "transaction" with "purchase"). The email has now been sent to the pgsql-sql mailing list. Craig Ringer wrote: Allan Kamau wrote: Hi all, I have a plain sql problem (didn't know where else to post it). pgsql-sql I have a list of tra

Re: [GENERAL] Removing redundant itemsets

2008-03-31 Thread Craig Ringer
Allan Kamau wrote: > Hi all, > I have a plain sql problem (didn't know where else to post it). pgsql-sql > I have a list of transactions (market basket) ... Your use of the term "transaction" for a database entity is really confusing, and will make it significantly harder for others to understan

[GENERAL] Removing redundant itemsets

2008-03-31 Thread Allan Kamau
Hi all, I have a plain sql problem (didn't know where else to post it). I have a list of transactions (market basket) and I would like to select non redundant longest possible patterns by eliminating (creating/populating other table to contain only non redandant itemsets) transactions having it

Re: [GENERAL] Using tables in other PostGreSQL database

2008-03-31 Thread Daniel Verite
Scott Marlowe wrote: > > Even in Oracle you don't have cross db queries. > > On the contrary you do. You can refer to objects in another database by > [EMAIL PROTECTED], very useful to mix local and remote data in no > time. DBLINK_NAME represents a connection to another databa

[GENERAL] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong

2008-03-31 Thread Stuart Brooks
I have a table with about 15 million rows which is constantly having tuples added to the head and deleted in blocks from the tail to maintain the size. The dead tuple count in pg_stat_user_tables tracks the deleted rows fairly accurately until an auto-ANALYZE is done in the background at which

Re: [GENERAL] Schema design question

2008-03-31 Thread Ron Mayer
Ben wrote: I'm working on a project which requires me to keep track of objects, each of which can have an arbitrary number of attributes. Although there will be many attributes that an object can have,... Anyway, this seems like a common problem without a perfect solution, and I'm sure people m

Re: [GENERAL] shortcut for select * where id in (arrayvar)

2008-03-31 Thread Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:40:52 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > for _row in > > select err, msg from errortable where err in (errcode) > > > where errcode is an array. > > That syntax doesn't work... > In recent PG releases it wi

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL and Java on WindowsXP

2008-03-31 Thread josep porres
maybe you don't need PL/Java... You are trying to connect using JDBC, right? Take a look at http://jdbc.postgresql.org/doc.html Which errors do you get? Is the server listening on standard port? anyway, you have to provide more information. Josep 2008/3/30, Vismaster46 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL and Java on WindowsXP

2008-03-31 Thread Albe Laurenz
Vismaster46 wrote: > I need to install on my local Windows XP machine PostgreSQL to test > some Java applications. > > The trouble is that I cannot connect to PostgreSQL via Java > application, because the connection fails every time...what's the > problem? I have not installed PL/Java package cau

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL and Java on WindowsXP

2008-03-31 Thread Damian Carey
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Vismaster46 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to install on my local Windows XP machine PostgreSQL to test > The trouble is that I cannot connect to PostgreSQL via Java > application, because the connection fails every time...what's the > problem? Sorry, but

[GENERAL] PostgreSQL and Java on WindowsXP

2008-03-31 Thread Vismaster46
Hello! I need to install on my local Windows XP machine PostgreSQL to test some Java applications. The trouble is that I cannot connect to PostgreSQL via Java application, because the connection fails every time...what's the problem? I have not installed PL/Java package cause my Postgre installer