Le mercredi 9 décembre 2009 à 01:52:03, George Silva a écrit :
[...]
I can't seem to understand why a simples if is not working on the
creation of rules.
I tried both ways (am i missing something?):
Sure. IF does not exist in SQL, and you can only put SQL statements in a rule.
Instead,
Thanks Tom,
That was my initial view and I'm still not convinced that I'm wrong - I
can see no way that the server can tell that the query came from a
process without a terminal (though I may be missing something here).
Unfortunately I'm working at the boundary of my knowledge for both
torque and
Thanks for that clarification Merlin,
The server/client is on a workstation that is essentially private (I
share some time with students, but they don't have pg access). The locks
are across sessions. There are three perl scripts that connect to a pg
db, one loads the database and creates some
On Wednesday 9. December 2009 09.06.12 Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
Le mercredi 9 décembre 2009 à 01:52:03, George Silva a écrit :
[...]
I can't seem to understand why a simples if is not working on the
creation of rules.
I tried both ways (am i missing something?):
Sure. IF does not
Hello guys,
Still having some trouble with this.
I'm trying to use a case when, but postgres is still giving me syntax error.
CREATE OR REPLACE RULE instead_update AS ON UPDATE TO foo
DO INSTEAD
(
CASE SELECT exists(SELECT 1 FROM versioning.foo_version_1 WHERE
OLD.oid = NEW.oid) as a WHEN
Hello ,
after google search i havent found any solution or clue for this specific case:
Background:
Postgresql: 8.3.0
select version();
version
PostgreSQL
Le mercredi 9 décembre 2009 à 12:38:33, George Silva a écrit :
Hello guys,
Still having some trouble with this.
I'm trying to use a case when, but postgres is still giving me syntax
error.
CREATE OR REPLACE RULE instead_update AS ON UPDATE TO foo
DO INSTEAD
(
CASE SELECT
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Allan Kamau kamaual...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I did follow the basic advise and consulted the documentation for
SELECT and came across [ FETCH { FIRST | NEXT } [ count ] { ROW |
ROWS }
Hi, I'm trying to set up a database with freeRADIUS server and I'm getting
some doubts.
I installed freeradius-postgresql package and nothing else. I've configured
all the files like it explains in the SQL How To on FreeRADIUS wiki. So far
so good, but at this part:
*Setting up the RADIUS
Joana Camacho a écrit :
...
su - postgres
createuser radius --no-superuser --no-createdb --no-createrole -P
^^
createdb radius --owner=radius
^^
There's a slight contradiction...
--
***
***
*
Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
Joana Camacho a écrit :
...
su - postgres
createuser radius --no-superuser --no-createdb --no-createrole -P
^^
createdb radius --owner=radius
^^
There's a slight
John R Pierce a écrit :
Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
Joana Camacho a écrit :
...
su - postgres
createuser radius --no-superuser --no-createdb --no-createrole -P
^^
createdb radius --owner=radius
Hi all,
I'm searching for a Unix implementation of ODBC working on SPARC 64 bits?
iodbc doesn't seem to work well. DataDirect is really good but not free. And
UnixODBC doesn't seem to compile.
Any ideas?
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
--
Sent via
Hello all again :)
I have a question: is it possible to replicate the behavior of a rule
INSTEAD of with a TRIGGER?
For some specific reasons i need to use a trigger to update a
secondary table, but i don't want the changes to happen in the primary
table too.
Is it possible to do it? If so,
Le mercredi 9 décembre 2009 à 17:04:32, George Silva a écrit :
Hello all again :)
I have a question: is it possible to replicate the behavior of a rule
INSTEAD of with a TRIGGER?
For some specific reasons i need to use a trigger to update a
secondary table, but i don't want the changes to
Why I get: update or delete on table people violates foreign key
constraint transactions_person_id_fkey on table transactions
But before that query I run: SET CONSTRAINTS
transactions_person_id_fkey DEFERRED; before delete from people table
Log:
2009-12-09 20:01:51 EET LOG: statement: BEGIN;
Sergey Levchenko sector...@gmail.com writes:
Why I get: update or delete on table people violates foreign key
constraint transactions_person_id_fkey on table transactions
But before that query I run: SET CONSTRAINTS
transactions_person_id_fkey DEFERRED; before delete from people table
It
Hi all,
We're using PostgreSQL 8.4 ... We do our nightly database backups with pg_dump.
I was doing a test restore and I encountered some data during the reload that
was in a table against the conditions of a foreign key constraint. I run my
restores with the -e option to halt on errors, so
Hi there
Need help, I just took the example from Postgres help, code:
#include postgres.h
#include fmgr.h
#ifdef PG_MODULE_MAGIC
PG_MODULE_MAGIC;
#endif
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(add_one);
__declspec (dllexport) Datum add_one(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
int32 arg = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
Greetings!
We just upgraded a customer's PostgreSQL installation from 8.3 to 8.4.1. I
wanted to make a small change to the database. I wanted to take a backup
before I did it, just in case. When I run pgAdmin from the PostgreSQL/8.4/bin
folder and try to take a backup, the backup fails.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
You should turn on log_checkpoint in the postgresql.conf and confirm the
slowdowns are happening around the same time as the checkpoint report gets
written to the log files.
Thank you for your suggestions. I will turn
Some more information on fsync using the test_fsync tool in
postgres/src/tools:
System is Snow Leopard 10.6.2 (64 bit). Volumes are HFS+ formatted.
PASS 1 - DATABASE VOLUME (SSD RAID 0)
===
$ sudo ./test_fsync -f /Volumes/SSD/fsync_test.out
Simple write timing:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Stephen Tyler step...@stephen-tyler.com wrote:
The times are apparently in milliseconds. But that doesn't make any sense
for the 7200rpm SATA HDD, given it has an 8.3ms rotation time. And the
numbers for the SSD are basically identical to the HDD, apart from
Scott Marlowe wrote:
Actually, it's usually the drives that lie about fsync, especially
consumer grade (and some server grade) SATA / PATA drives are known
for this.
I'm still looking for any evidence of any drive that lies.
Is there actually a drive which claims to support the
IDE
My silly question is, do I needo to install a postgreSQL server or the freeradius-postgresql package already takes care of it?!
My question it's because it doesn't recognize any user ids and the createuser
command.
Yeah, that's pretty much the way things work on unix-like systems.
Instead
Stephen Tyler wrote:
The times are apparently in milliseconds. But that doesn't make any
sense for the 7200rpm SATA HDD, given it has an 8.3ms rotation time.
And the numbers for the SSD are basically identical to the HDD, apart
from the bare write timing.
Do I conclude that the sync timings
Ron Mayer wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
Actually, it's usually the drives that lie about fsync, especially
consumer grade (and some server grade) SATA / PATA drives are known
for this.
I'm still looking for any evidence of any drive that lies.
Is there actually a drive which claims to
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Ron Mayer rm...@cheapcomplexdevices.com wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
Actually, it's usually the drives that lie about fsync, especially
consumer grade (and some server grade) SATA / PATA drives are known
for this.
I'm still looking for any evidence of any drive
We just upgraded a customer's PostgreSQL installation from 8.3 to 8.4.1. I
wanted to make a small change to the database. I wanted to take a backup
before I did it, just in case. When I run pgAdmin from the
PostgreSQL/8.4/bin folder and try to take a backup, the backup fails. The
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:33 AM, AlexeyChe alexey.chernus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there
Need help, I just took the example from Postgres help, code:
#include postgres.h
#include fmgr.h
#ifdef PG_MODULE_MAGIC
PG_MODULE_MAGIC;
#endif
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(add_one);
__declspec (dllexport)
All
How to Install compat-postgresql-libs-debuginfo on postgres 8.3.8 by
compiling the source code.
The way i have installed postgres is by compiling the postgres files.
Thanks
Deepak
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
PostgreSQL on OS X uses a special fsync method by default named
'fsync_writethrough'. If you do this on your database you should be able to
confirm it's using it:
show wal_sync_method;
This method includes a call to
On 10/12/2009 3:31 AM, CG wrote:
Hi all,
We're using PostgreSQL 8.4 ... We do our nightly database backups with
pg_dump. I was doing a test restore and I encountered some data during
the reload that was in a table against the conditions of a foreign key
constraint. I run my restores with the -e
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Stephen Tyler step...@stephen-tyler.com wrote:
Thank you for your suggestions. I will turn on log_checkpoint next time I
get the chance to restart.
You should be able to set this via a sighup to the server. No restart required.
--
Sent via pgsql-general
Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info writes:
I'm searching for a Unix implementation of ODBC working on SPARC 64 bits?
iodbc doesn't seem to work well. DataDirect is really good but not free. And
UnixODBC doesn't seem to compile.
What unixODBC version? If 2.2.14 doesn't work on Sparc
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:38 -0800, DM wrote:
How to Install compat-postgresql-libs-debuginfo on postgres 8.3.8 by
compiling the source code.
The way i have installed postgres is by compiling the postgres files.
You can still install it via RPM -- it doesn't matter whether you
compiled
Hi,
We have started using PostGreSQL for more than 3 months and it looks
awesome. Currently, we have been suing superuser by default as login
account. Now, the users are getting increased and we want to go away with
using superuser by default. We want to create the separate user account for
every
Can someone please share some light on this
- Forwarded Message
From: Postgre Novice postgrenov...@yahoo.com
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Wed, December 9, 2009 5:23:18 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] ERROR: could not open relation with OID 59132
Hello ,
after google search i
38 matches
Mail list logo
