Re: [GENERAL] Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project

2009-12-21 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby
Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com : Again, the audience is managers. Is there an impartial, 3rd party evaluation of the 2 DBs out there that identifies PG as being more reliable? It might mention things like fewer incidences of corrupt tables/indexes, fewer deamon crashes, better

Re: [GENERAL] Server Requirements

2009-12-21 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby
Christine Penner christ...@ingenioussoftware.com : If we have clients that are going to buy new computers or upgrade current ones, what we can recommend to them for optimal system performance to run Postgres. Make them buy the biggest, run virtual machine that dont use all the ressources on

Re: [GENERAL] postgre...@fosdem 2010 - Call for talks

2009-12-21 Thread Dave Page
Have you sent us you talk proposal for FOSDEM yet? If not, there is just one day left to prepare and send your submission for presentation in the PostgreSQL devroom at FOSDEM 2010! Not sure if your topic is appropriate? Send it anyway and let us decide! Never spoken to a room full of geeks

Re: [GENERAL] Charset Win1250 on Windows and Ubuntu

2009-12-21 Thread Durumdara
Hi! 2009/12/19 Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at If you need the data in WIN1250 on the client side, change the client encoding to WIN1250. So: - Create the database with UTF8. - Change the client encoding to WIN1250 (e.g. by setting the environment variable PGCLIENTENCODING). -

Re: [GENERAL] PL/Perl Performance Problems

2009-12-21 Thread Alex -
Thanks,I am already have started doing that. i.e. running the dummy task to get the tables loaded again and it worked fine today. regardsAlex To: ainto...@hotmail.com CC: scott.marl...@gmail.com; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PL/Perl Performance Problems Date: Sun,

Re: [GENERAL] Charset Win1250 on Windows and Ubuntu

2009-12-21 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:26:51AM +0100, Durumdara wrote: So if I have Python and pygresql, can I set this value in Python? The main problem that I don't want to set this value globally - possible another applications want to use another encoding... Each connection can set the encoding to

Re: [GENERAL] Charset Win1250 on Windows and Ubuntu

2009-12-21 Thread Alban Hertroys
On 21 Dec 2009, at 10:26, Durumdara wrote: So if I have Python and pygresql, can I set this value in Python? The main problem that I don't want to set this value globally - possible another applications want to use another encoding Sure you can, just execute SET client_encoding TO

[GENERAL] Question about the ANY operator

2009-12-21 Thread Mike Christensen
I'm having trouble figuring out the ANY operator.. Basically I want to return rows that match any of the given IDs: select Name from Users where UserId = ANY ARRAY['948aeda5--41bd-af4e-71d1c740db76', '5ee315ea-7ef6-4fa5-809a-dc9931a01ed1']::uuid[]; I get the syntax error: ERROR: syntax

Re: [GENERAL] Something like Oracle Forms, but Open Source to use with PostgreSQL?

2009-12-21 Thread Ivan Voras
John R Pierce wrote: Andre Lopes wrote: Hi, I need to know if there is something like Oracle Forms in the Open Source world that works with PostgreSQL. If do you know something, please let me know. perhaps OpenOffice Data could do what you need. I'm not real familiar with Oracle Forms,

Re: [GENERAL] Question about the ANY operator

2009-12-21 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:46:59AM -0800, Mike Christensen wrote: I'm having trouble figuring out the ANY operator.. Basically I want to return rows that match any of the given IDs: select Name from Users where UserId = ANY ARRAY['948aeda5--41bd-af4e-71d1c740db76',

[GENERAL] import warnings ?

2009-12-21 Thread Malm Paul
Hi list, I'm using FWTOOLS ogr2gr to import a s57 chart. Im getting a warning when I'm importing in Linux but not in Windows XP, see below. Could anyone tell me why and what the difference is in the result (I can't see it because the lnam_refs is empty), will I miss anything? ogr2ogr -f

Re: [GENERAL] Question about the ANY operator

2009-12-21 Thread Mike Christensen
Uggghhh.. Yea I figured that out about 30 seconds before your reply.. I guess it would be way too much trouble for Postgres to just say Expected parenthesis or some sort of error that would actually be helpful to noobs like me. But thanks :) Mike On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Martijn van

Re: [GENERAL] Something like Oracle Forms, but Open Source to use with PostgreSQL?

2009-12-21 Thread Andre Lopes
Hi, What I need is some CRUD app that allows me to be quick in developp forms to insert, update and delete information in the database. I will be using this in a website database, but for now I don't have time to develop the forms and the admin side on the website, so I need to use an temporary

Re: [GENERAL] Something like Oracle Forms, but Open Source to use with PostgreSQL?

2009-12-21 Thread Allan Kamau
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Andre Lopes lopes80an...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, What I need is some CRUD app that allows me to be quick in developp forms to insert, update and delete information in the database. I will be using this in a website database, but for now I don't have time to

Re: [GENERAL] Something like Oracle Forms, but Open Source to use with PostgreSQL?

2009-12-21 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 10:59 +, Andre Lopes wrote: Hi, What I need is some CRUD app that allows me to be quick in developp forms to insert, update and delete information in the database. I will be using this in a website database, What do you mean by website database? A database is a

Re: [GENERAL] Charset Win1250 on Windows and Ubuntu

2009-12-21 Thread Albe Laurenz
Durumdara wrote: - Change the client encoding to WIN1250 (e.g. by setting the environment variable PGCLIENTENCODING). So if I have Python and pygresql, can I set this value in Python? The main problem that I don't want to set this value globally - possible another applications want to use

Re: [GENERAL] Something like Oracle Forms, but Open Source to use with PostgreSQL?

2009-12-21 Thread Alban Hertroys
On 21 Dec 2009, at 11:59, Andre Lopes wrote: Hi, What I need is some CRUD app that allows me to be quick in developp forms to insert, update and delete information in the database. I will be using this in a website database, but for now I don't have time to develop the forms and the

Re: [GENERAL] Charset Win1250 on Windows and Ubuntu

2009-12-21 Thread Durumdara
Hi! 2009/12/21 Albe Laurenz laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at Durumdara wrote: - Change the client encoding to WIN1250 (e.g. by setting the environment variable PGCLIENTENCODING). So if I have Python and pygresql, can I set this value in Python? The main problem that I don't want to set this

Re: [GENERAL] Extracting SQL from logs in a usable format

2009-12-21 Thread Chris Ernst
Dimitri Fontaine wrote: Le 19 déc. 2009 à 16:20, Chris Ernst a écrit : Hmm.. That does look very interesting. The only thing that concerns me is where it says it supports Basic Queries (Extended queries not yet supported). I'm not sure what is meant by Extended queries. Any idea? I

Re: [GENERAL] Selecting from table into an array var

2009-12-21 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Postgres User postgres.develo...@gmail.com wrote: Great call, someone did hose the data.  Oddly enough the circular reference caused no problem when running the stand alone recursive SQL (with clause). no problem. I would advise guarding against circular

Re: [GENERAL] import warnings ?

2009-12-21 Thread Adrian Klaver
On Monday 21 December 2009 2:24:02 am Malm Paul wrote: Hi list, I'm using FWTOOLS ogr2gr to import a s57 chart. Im getting a warning when I'm importing in Linux but not in Windows XP, see below. Could anyone tell me why and what the difference is in the result (I can't see it because the

[GENERAL]

2009-12-21 Thread Wappler, Robert
Hello, when defining functions, why can't they take table-valued arguments? I do not see the sense of this restriction. When a function takes a table as an argument, whole tables could be transformed in an obvious way. Currently functions must operate row-wise (at least I haven't found another

[GENERAL] Who writes CONTEXT ?

2009-12-21 Thread Nicola Farina
Hello all, I am trying to debug a plperlu set of stored procedures. in pg 8.3.7. When I launch a procedure I see messages, in the output window, beginning with the string CONTEXT: SQL statement SELECT ... Which procedure or predefined function prints this kind of messages ? Is this a standard

Re: [GENERAL] Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project

2009-12-21 Thread Scott Ribe
I dont know if it's a plus or a minus, but: Well, the fact that Monty secretly tried to persuade the EC toward forcing Oracle to release MySQL under a license other than the GPL, while lying denying that in public, really shouldn't be considered a plus for MySQL, I would think ;-) Seriously,

Re: [GENERAL] Something like Oracle Forms, but Open Source to use with PostgreSQL?

2009-12-21 Thread Scott Bailey
Ivan Voras wrote: John R Pierce wrote: Andre Lopes wrote: Hi, I need to know if there is something like Oracle Forms in the Open Source world that works with PostgreSQL. If do you know something, please let me know. perhaps OpenOffice Data could do what you need. I'm not real familiar

Re: [GENERAL] Who writes CONTEXT ?

2009-12-21 Thread Filip Rembiałkowski
2009/12/21 Nicola Farina nicola.far...@info-line.it Hello all, I am trying to debug a plperlu set of stored procedures. in pg 8.3.7. When I launch a procedure I see messages, in the output window, beginning with the string CONTEXT: SQL statement SELECT ... Which procedure or predefined

Re: [GENERAL] defining yuor own commands in PG ?

2009-12-21 Thread Israel Brewster
On Dec 19, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Filip Rembiałkowski wrote:2009/12/18 Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com Can you define your own commands in PG. In psql, yes:\set sel 'SELECT * FROM':sel clients;\set desc '\\d' :desc table E.g., if users from other DBs use “describe foo” to get the metadata for

Re: [GENERAL]

2009-12-21 Thread Filip Rembiałkowski
2009/12/21 Wappler, Robert rwapp...@ophardt.com Hello, when defining functions, why can’t they take table-valued arguments? I do not see the sense of this restriction. When a function takes a table as an argument, whole tables could be transformed in an obvious way. Currently functions

Re: [GENERAL] Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project

2009-12-21 Thread Erik Jones
On Dec 21, 2009, at 8:44 AM, Scott Ribe wrote: Well, the fact that Monty secretly tried to persuade the EC toward forcing Oracle to release MySQL under a license other than the GPL, while lying denying that in public, really shouldn't be considered a plus for MySQL, I would think ;-)

Re: [GENERAL] Unix ODBC on SPARC 64 bits

2009-12-21 Thread OpenLink Support
Hi Guilliame, What is the problem you are having using iODBC on SPARC 64bit (I presume running Solaris), as it has been ported to Solaris SPARC 64bit for over a decade and bundle with the OpenLink ODBC Drivers for this OS across the various Solaris releases over the same period. The Version of

Re: [GENERAL] Extended Query, flush or sync ?

2009-12-21 Thread Raimon Fernandez
Hello, On 19/12/2009, at 4:31, John DeSoi wrote: On Dec 18, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Raimon Fernandez wrote: It's not clear for me if I have to issue a flush or sync after each process of an extended query. It's almost working for me only when I send a sync, but not when I send a flush.

[GENERAL] unsubscribe

2009-12-21 Thread cedric.villemain
-- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Re: [GENERAL] Extended Query, flush or sync ?

2009-12-21 Thread Raimon Fernandez
On 18/12/2009, at 22:55, Tom Lane wrote: Raimon Fernandez co...@montx.com writes: It's not clear for me if I have to issue a flush or sync after each process of an extended query. Basically, you send one of these at the points where you're going to wait for an answer back. Sync is

[GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Ralph Graulich
Hello, I am running PostgreSQL 8.4.2. For the testcase I have a database, a user, and two schemas within the database. Two tables in those two different schemas have the same name, but only on of those tables shows up using the \dt command. How-To-Repeat: -- psql template1 CREATE ROLE

Re: [GENERAL] Extended Query, flush or sync ?

2009-12-21 Thread John DeSoi
On Dec 19, 2009, at 2:40 AM, Raimon Fernandez wrote: I send: parse bind describe execute sync and then loop on the connection stream to receive the responses. And do you get the parseComplete after sending the parse or after sending the sync ? I don't really know or care. I send

Re: [GENERAL] Extended Query, flush or sync ?

2009-12-21 Thread John DeSoi
On Dec 18, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Raimon Fernandez wrote: It's not clear for me if I have to issue a flush or sync after each process of an extended query. It's almost working for me only when I send a sync, but not when I send a flush. With the flush, the connection seems freezed, or at

[GENERAL] logtrigger/denyaccess triggers removed from master/slave

2009-12-21 Thread tamanna madaan
Hi All I am using postgres-8.1.2 and slony-1.1.5 for replication. I have 1 master and 1 slave in my cluster. Sometimes I see problem of missing logtriggers and denyaccess triggers on master table and slave tables respectively. Replication don't take place in that state though systems are

Re: [GENERAL] Extended Query, flush or sync ?

2009-12-21 Thread Tom Lane
Raimon Fernandez co...@montx.com writes: It's not clear for me if I have to issue a flush or sync after each process of an extended query. Basically, you send one of these at the points where you're going to wait for an answer back. Sync is different from Flush in that it also provides a

Re: [GENERAL] Extended Query, flush or sync ?

2009-12-21 Thread Raimon Fernandez
Hi John, I'm not seeing my e-mails on the PostgreSQL General List ... ?? On 19/12/2009, at 16:32, John DeSoi wrote: On Dec 19, 2009, at 2:40 AM, Raimon Fernandez wrote: I send: parse bind describe execute sync and then loop on the connection stream to receive the

Re: [GENERAL] defining yuor own commands in PG ?

2009-12-21 Thread Pavel Stehule
2009/12/21 Israel Brewster isr...@frontierflying.com: On Dec 19, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Filip Rembiałkowski wrote: 2009/12/18 Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com Can you define your own commands in PG. In psql, yes: \set sel 'SELECT * FROM' :sel clients; \set desc '\\d' :desc table

Re: [GENERAL] Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project

2009-12-21 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Erik Jones ejo...@engineyard.com wrote: On Dec 21, 2009, at 8:44 AM, Scott Ribe wrote: Well, the fact that Monty secretly tried to persuade the EC toward forcing Oracle to release MySQL under a license other than the GPL, while lying denying that in public,

Re: [GENERAL] logtrigger/denyaccess triggers removed from master/slave

2009-12-21 Thread Greg Stark
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:59 PM, tamanna madaan tamanna.ma...@globallogic.com wrote: I am using postgres-8.1.2 and slony-1.1.5 for replication. I don't know about your Slony problems but the current bug-fix release for 8.1 is 8.1.19. That's 17 releases to fix security holes, crashes, data

Re: [GENERAL] Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project

2009-12-21 Thread Gauthier, Dave
I was wondering... In head-to-head comparisons, do DBs get stree tested, not only in terms of performance, but in terms of corruptions, down time, recovery time, lost data, etc... .? I've heard it said that MySQL is superior to MySQL in this regard. But if this were stated in an article

Re: [GENERAL] Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project

2009-12-21 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote: They have ways to cope with this.  Since they all code in perl/DBI, they could simpy open handles to the 2 DBs.  Or there's an op sys level app out there that they could use to get the same data.  But I was

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Filip Rembiałkowski
2009/12/19 Ralph Graulich ralph.graul...@t-online.de -- Only one of the two relations is shown http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general I would call it a bug. Reproduced here, on 8.4.2 and 8.3.8 -- Filip Rembiałkowski JID,mailto:filip.rembialkow...@gmail.com

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Adrian Klaver
- Filip Rembiałkowski plk.zu...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/19 Ralph Graulich ralph.graul...@t-online.de -- Only one of the two relations is shown I would call it a bug. Reproduced here, on 8.4.2 and 8.3.8 Try \dt *.table1 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Scott Marlowe
According to the docs, http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/app-psql.html says in part: Whenever the pattern parameter is omitted completely, the \d commands display all objects that are visible in the current schema search path — this is equivalent to using the pattern *. To see all

[GENERAL] unsubscribe

2009-12-21 Thread Justin Alston
-- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Scott Marlowe
2009/12/21 Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net: - Filip Rembiałkowski plk.zu...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/19 Ralph Graulich ralph.graul...@t-online.de -- Only one of the two relations is shown I would call it a bug. Reproduced here, on 8.4.2 and 8.3.8 Try \dt *.table1

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Adrian Klaver
- Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/21 Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net: - Filip Rembiałkowski plk.zu...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/19 Ralph Graulich ralph.graul...@t-online.de -- Only one of the two relations is shown I would call it

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net wrote: - Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/21 Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net: - Filip Rembiałkowski plk.zu...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/19 Ralph Graulich ralph.graul...@t-online.de

Re: [GENERAL] Extracting SQL from logs in a usable format

2009-12-21 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Le 21 déc. 2009 à 15:24, Chris Ernst a écrit : Ouch! You're right. And that's would be a deal killer for me. About 90% of the traffic is prepared queries that are run over and over with different parameters. The driver project and code are now there it seems: http://frihjul.net/pgsql

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Tom Lane
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes: So, either the docs for \dt need fixing to reflect reality, or they're right and psql \dt needs fixing. The documentation says Whenever the pattern parameter is omitted completely, the \d commands display all objects that are visible in

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Adrian Klaver
On Monday 21 December 2009 3:42:10 pm Tom Lane wrote: Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes: So, either the docs for \dt need fixing to reflect reality, or they're right and psql \dt needs fixing. The documentation says Whenever the pattern parameter is omitted completely,

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Tom Lane
Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net writes: On Monday 21 December 2009 3:42:10 pm Tom Lane wrote: Seems clear enough to me. Well yes and no. The first couple of times I read this I was tripped up by layout: the pattern *. To see all objects in the database, use the pattern *.*. I took it to

Re: [GENERAL] Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project

2009-12-21 Thread Robert Hodges
On 12/21/09 11:23 AM PST, Gauthier, Dave dave.gauth...@intel.com wrote: I was wondering... In head-to-head comparisons, do DBs get stree tested, not only in terms of performance, but in terms of corruptions, down time, recovery time, lost data, etc... .? I've heard it said that MySQL is

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes: So, either the docs for \dt need fixing to reflect reality, or they're right and psql \dt needs fixing. The documentation says   Whenever the pattern parameter   is omitted

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Tom Lane
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes: Then you should see BOTH tables with the same name in different schemas, right? Cause the OP was saying that it picks only the first one to display. Well, yes, because only the first one is visible. The second one is masked by the first.

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes: Then you should see BOTH tables with the same name in different schemas, right?  Cause the OP was saying that it picks only the first one to display. Well, yes, because only the

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Tom Lane
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Well, yes, because only the first one is visible.  The second one is masked by the first. But the docs say that ALL objects in the schema path will be shown. So, my point stands,

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Well, yes, because only the first one is visible.  The second one is masked by the first. But the docs say

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Adrian Klaver
On Monday 21 December 2009 5:17:49 pm Scott Marlowe wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Well, yes, because only the first one is visible.  

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Tom Lane
Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net writes: On Monday 21 December 2009 5:17:49 pm Scott Marlowe wrote: Ahh, right, it's about visibility. Hadn't caught that part. I think that is where the biggest misunderstanding lies. On looking at the page some more, it strikes me that part of the problem

Re: [GENERAL] \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)

2009-12-21 Thread Adrian Klaver
On Monday 21 December 2009 6:17:22 pm Tom Lane wrote: Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net writes: On Monday 21 December 2009 5:17:49 pm Scott Marlowe wrote: Ahh, right, it's about visibility. Hadn't caught that part. I think that is where the biggest misunderstanding lies. On looking at

Re: [GENERAL] Unix ODBC on SPARC 64 bits

2009-12-21 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 20/12/2009 19:27, OpenLink Support a écrit : [...] What is the problem you are having using iODBC on SPARC 64bit (I presume running Solaris), as it has been ported to Solaris SPARC 64bit for over a decade and bundle with the OpenLink ODBC Drivers for this OS across the various Solaris

Re: [GENERAL] Unix ODBC on SPARC 64 bits

2009-12-21 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 10/12/2009 05:56, Tom Lane a écrit : Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info writes: I'm searching for a Unix implementation of ODBC working on SPARC 64 bits? iodbc doesn't seem to work well. DataDirect is really good but not free. And UnixODBC doesn't seem to compile. What unixODBC