2010/11/14 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org:
I just released PostgreSQL 9.0 RPM for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and
Fedora 14, on both x86 and x86_64.
Please note that 9.0 packages have a different layout as compared to
previous ones. You may want to read this blog post about this first:
I am using PG 8.2.17 with UTF8 encoding.
PostgreSQL 8.2.17 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.1.1
(Gentoo 4.1.1)
One of my tables somehow has invalid characters in it:
ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding UTF8: 0xa9
HINT: This error can also happen if the byte sequence
On 21 Nov 2010, at 24:17, Trevor Talbot wrote:
I can't explain it any clearer, your email response goes to the mailing list
and that mailing list sends a copy to the original person thats how a
mailing list works. It also sends a copy to the forum which is parses you
and that person and
On 21 Nov 2010, at 5:08, Kent Tong wrote:
Hi,
Let's say that there is some data that should be logically shared by
many applications in the company, such as some core information about
its customers (name, address, contact info). In principle, such data
should be stored in a DB for
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 05:04, Alban Hertroys
dal...@solfertje.student.utwente.nl wrote:
On 21 Nov 2010, at 24:17, Trevor Talbot wrote:
Elliot, Magnus wants forum-list email to come from a per-user address
so that when he replies directly to that address (without sending it
to the list), the
Hey Sim,
Maybe this helps:
http://blog.tapoueh.org/articles/blog/_Getting_out_of_SQL_ASCII,_part_2.html
2010/11/21 Sim Zacks s...@compulab.co.il
I am using PG 8.2.17 with UTF8 encoding.
PostgreSQL 8.2.17 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.1.1
(Gentoo 4.1.1)
One of my tables
KM k...@xacrasis.netx writes:
On an OpenBSD machine I just compiled and installed 9.0.1. The
./configure arguments included '--sysconfdir=/etc'. Running
'pg_config --sysconfdir' returns '/etc/postgresql'. The cluster is
running and I can create a database and connect to it.
However,
On 11/21/2010 06:04 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
On 21 Nov 2010, at 24:17, Trevor Talbot wrote:
I can't explain it any clearer, your email response goes to the mailing
list and that mailing list sends a copy to the original person thats how a
mailing list works. It also sends a copy to the
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 18:12, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alban Hertroys dal...@solfertje.student.utwente.nl writes:
I'm not one of the people who've been communicating off-list about this with
him, so I may be wrong, but to my understanding what Magnus wants (the
requirement, not a
Alban Hertroys dal...@solfertje.student.utwente.nl writes:
I'm not one of the people who've been communicating off-list about this with
him, so I may be wrong, but to my understanding what Magnus wants (the
requirement, not a solution to it) is this:
- Person A is on the forums and sends a
Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com writes:
On 21/11/2010, at 2:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com writes:
Then I can create a catch-all so that when an email is sent to
forums-chan...@postgresql.com.au it finds the user chancey gets the real
address and sends it
On 21 Nov 2010, at 16:16, Trevor Talbot wrote:
I do see a difficulty here; if the forum software is only subscribed with
one e-mail address, how is it going to distinguish between a reply-all and a
private reply?
Maybe it would help to subscribe it using two or three addresses, so that
you
On 21/11/2010, at 2:59 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:46, Elliot Chance elliotcha...@gmail.com wrote:
for...@postgresql.com.au is pointed to a black hole so that email
disappears but the mailing list gets another copy. When the mailing list
gets
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 16:54, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Elliot Chance wrote:
Also, if someone registers on the forum, do they get a major domo
registration email? And if so, would this be set to receive no emails
upon registration? I'm not clear as to how this step would
On 2010-11-21, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
SYSCONFDIR is only used for global configuration files, like the default
psqlrc or pg_service.conf.
OK, so it doesn't regard postgresql.conf and friends as conf files in
that sense.
It would be pretty inappropriate to put postgresql.conf there
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:40 +1100, Elliot Chance wrote:
I would argue that if the person wants to use a forum, aren't they
saying they don't want to be contacted via email. I think we just throw
it only to the forum (that is the user) and leave it that. Forum users
don't get the _rich_
Hi Alban,
Thanks a lot for your useful info!
I think most companies have ended up at that point just by the progress
of time. They have several different databases (often from different
vendors even) that they need to aggregate their information from.
So, is this the result of lack of
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:40:34AM +1100, Elliot Chance wrote:
It does surprise me a bit that when I (or someone else) signs up to
a mailing list (not postgres specifically) that there is no fine
print or agreement that says something along the lines of Your
email address will be plastered all
On 22/11/10 07:40, Elliot Chance wrote:
It does surprise me a bit that when I (or someone else) signs up to a mailing
list (not postgres specifically) that there is no fine print or agreement
that says something along the lines of Your email address will be plastered
all over the internet,
I am dynamically generating a query like below that creates different
combinations of rules by left joining (any number of times) on itself and
avoiding rules with some of the same attributes as part of the joins
conditions e.g.
SELECT count(*)
FROM rules AS t1
LEFT JOIN rules AS t2
Dear all,
I am reading about Dialects of different databases. Yet I can't
understand what is the need of dialect in Postgres or any other like
Hibernate uses Dialect of all Databases for ORM.
What is it
How can we create our own Dialect ?
Thanks in Advance
Adarsh Sharma
--
Sent via
On 22 Nov 2010, at 4:43, Kent Tong wrote:
Hi Alban,
Thanks a lot for your useful info!
I think most companies have ended up at that point just by the progress
of time. They have several different databases (often from different
vendors even) that they need to aggregate their information
22 matches
Mail list logo
