Per 8.0 documentation, in order to ALTER a table (including rename), you
have to be the owner of a table:
You must own the table to use ALTER TABLE; except for ALTER TABLE OWNER,
which may only be executed by a superuser.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/sql-altertable.html
If you want
Hi,
is there a way to sort the joined tuples in the way they are in a the joined
array ? BTW I'm using 8.4 (_I_ know I should upgrade, but management thinks
we shouldn't :-( )
I'd like to join 2 tables based on a column, where the column is an array in
one table, but I still need to keep the order
On 05/17/2011 01:38 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
Hi,
2011/05/17 14:31, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Rick Genter wrote:
On May 16, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Dear all,
I need to research on Memcache in the next few days.
What I want to know is it worth to have memcahed enable in our
On 05/17/2011 01:31 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
At what stage we need memcached what is the purpose of using it.
You might not need it. Depends on the nature of your app, its
performance requirements, how strict it is about always getting
consistent current data, and how much money you have
Sorry, I'm using 8.1, not 8.4.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Gerhard Hintermayer
gerhard.hinterma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to sort the joined tuples in the way they are in a the
joined array ? BTW I'm using 8.4 (_I_ know I should upgrade, but management
thinks we shouldn't
2011/5/17 Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au:
On 05/17/2011 01:38 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
Hi,
2011/05/17 14:31, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Rick Genter wrote:
On May 16, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Dear all,
I need to research on Memcache in the next few days.
What I
On Pavel's blog, I found this statement, which does just what I need:
select (each(hstore(foo))).* from foo;
Excuse the daft question, but could, please, you explain what .* does?
--
Best Regards,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:27:08PM +0100, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz wrote:
On Pavel's blog, I found this statement, which does just what I need:
select (each(hstore(foo))).* from foo;
Excuse the daft question, but could, please, you explain what .* does?
each(hstore) is a function that
2011/5/17 Adarsh Sharma adarsh.sha...@orkash.com:
Dear all,
Today I grant a user all privileges to all tables in a database by
grant all privileges on svo_data_social to neha ; grant all
privileges on svo_phrases to neha ;
.. . .
.
...
Now i find it very
Okay, as it turns out. the query was in fact running as expected (i.e.
concatenating results from RETURN QUERY). I just had a horribly wrong
initial query with which to loop...wow I feel stupid for raising all the
fuss.
Thanks again, everyone, for all your help!
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:17 PM,
Hi
The method you're using is functionally correct and quite efficient if
a little on the verbose side.
Other non-postgres variants of SQL have a DECODE function which
comes in very handy.
I dont believe postgres has any equivalent. (Postgres decode() does
something entirely differnt).
I often
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Gerhard Hintermayer
gerhard.hinterma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to sort the joined tuples in the way they are in a the joined
array ? BTW I'm using 8.4 (_I_ know I should upgrade, but management thinks
we shouldn't :-( )
I'd like to join 2 tables
Hi folks,
I've been looking at converting my existing debversion datatype
extension to use the proper CREATE EXTENSION facility for 9.1,
while also being backward compatible with 8.4 and 9.0.
My initial work on the conversion is here:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Bosco Rama postg...@boscorama.com wrote:
If you are truly intent on removing the sequence you'll need to do the
following:
alter sequence users_seq_id owned by NONE
alter table users alter column id drop default
drop sequence users_seq_id
Yes that
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Carlos Mennens
carlos.menn...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes that worked perfect! I'm just curious if I have 20 tables and then
want all the 'id' columns to be auto incrementing , that means I have
to have 20 listed sequences for all 20 unique tables?
yes
Seems very
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
in postgres is as easy as
CREATE TABLE test(
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY);
hey! it's even less keystrokes!
I don't understand how this command above is associated with being
able to auto increment the 'id' column.
Ah - my apologies, I realized you will need to add a function for exec
(which may also require plpgsql language added to your database).
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Christopher Opena
counterv...@gmail.comwrote:
Per 8.0 documentation, in order to ALTER a table (including rename), you
have
On 17/05/2011 16:26, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jaime Casanovaja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
in postgres is as easy as
CREATE TABLE test(
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY);
hey! it's even less keystrokes!
I don't understand how this command above is associated with being
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Raymond O'Donnell r...@iol.ie wrote:
Well, the SERIAL pseudo-type creates the sequence, associates it with the
column, and sets a DEFAULT on the column which executes the nextval()
function on the sequence - all in one fell swoop. Read all about it here:
On 17/05/2011 17:35, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Raymond O'Donnellr...@iol.ie wrote:
Well, the SERIAL pseudo-type creates the sequence, associates it with the
column, and sets a DEFAULT on the column which executes the nextval()
function on the sequence - all in one
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Raymond O'Donnell r...@iol.ie wrote:
Yes, that's exactly right - SERIAL does it all for you. The mistake some
people make, on the other hand, is thinking that SERIAL is a type in its own
right - it's not, it just does all those steps automatically.
This
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Carlos Mennens
carlos.menn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Raymond O'Donnell r...@iol.ie wrote:
Yes, that's exactly right - SERIAL does it all for you. The mistake some
people make, on the other hand, is thinking that SERIAL is a type in
Sorry to pester the list with this, but I've unsubscribed @ the web interface
and I'm still getting email. Can an admin help me out here?
- Wells
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 17/05/2011 19:07, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Carlos Mennens
carlos.menn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Raymond O'Donnellr...@iol.ie wrote:
Yes, that's exactly right - SERIAL does it all for you. The mistake some
people make, on the other
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Raymond O'Donnell r...@iol.ie wrote:
That's because of what I just mentioned above. :-) It's not a type: it's
just a shortcut. What you need to do instead is something like this:
-- Create the sequence.
create sequence users_id_seq;
-- Tell the column to
On 05/17/2011 11:29 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Raymond O'Donnellr...@iol.ie wrote:
That's because of what I just mentioned above. :-) It's not a type: it's
just a shortcut. What you need to do instead is something like this:
-- Create the sequence.
create
Don't forget to use setval to set the current value of the sequence to the
highest number used in the data already, so that the next insertion uses a new,
unused value.
Susan Cassidy
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Susan Cassidy scass...@edgewave.com wrote:
Don't forget to use setval to set the current value of the sequence to the
highest number used in the data already, so that the next insertion uses a
new, unused value.
Doesn't the SERIAL shortcut automatically do
Doesn't the SERIAL shortcut automatically do this on the fly? How
would I set this?
ALTER TABLE table_name ALTER COLUMN id SET DEFAULT nextval('foo_seq_id');
If you have existing data, say with values 1, 2, 3, etc. and you set the column
to start using a sequence nextval as default, unless
On Fri, May 13, 2011 13:04, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have opened an issue for this with the ActiveRecord folks.
https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/544
This has been addressed by the AR team and is committed to master.
+-Infinity support for dates is slated for general release with
Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Raymond O'Donnell r...@iol.ie wrote:
That's because of what I just mentioned above. :-) It's not a type: it's
just a shortcut. What you need to do instead is something like this:
-- Create the sequence.
create sequence users_id_seq;
Hi,
I have installed postres/postgis 9 in win7.
I tried to edit pg_hba.conf not as postgres user and although i cancelled all
changes I can start my postgres any more..
Now I am thinking of re-installing postgresql but for sure i dont loose my data
...
Any ideas ?
Thx
George
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Alex - ainto...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
is there an easy way to return the date of every first Saturday of a month
in a data range i.e. 2011-2013
if you want a list of the first saturdays of every month and you're
using at least 8.4:
with q as (select d,
Hi salah,
I tried
C:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.0\binpg_ctl.exe -U postgres restart
pg_ctl: PID file C:/Program Files/PostgreSQL/9.0/data/postmaster.pid does not
exist
Is server running?
starting server anyway
server starting
but i get the following error:
2011-05-18 02:09:26 EEST LOG:
On 18/05/2011 4:02 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 13:04, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have opened an issue for this with the ActiveRecord folks.
https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/544
This has been addressed by the AR team and is committed to master.
+-Infinity support for
On 18/05/2011 7:13 AM, G. P. wrote:
C:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.0\binpg_ctl.exe -U postgres restart
pg_ctl: PID file C:/Program Files/PostgreSQL/9.0/data/postmaster.pid
*/2011-05-18 02:09:26 EEST LOG: database system was shut down at
2011-05-17 22:45:00 EEST/*
*/2011-05-18 02:09:36 EEST
Wells Oliver woli...@padres.com wrote:
Sorry to pester the list with this, but I've unsubscribed @ the web interface
and I'm still getting email. Can an admin help me out here?
List-Archive: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general
List-Help: mailto:majord...@postgresql.org?body=help
On 05/17/2011 11:12 AM, Wells Oliver wrote:
Sorry to pester the list with this, but I've unsubscribed @ the web interface
and I'm still getting email. Can an admin help me out here?
Did you get an email asking you to confirm your request to unsubscribe?
- Wells
--
Adrian Klaver
38 matches
Mail list logo
