* Josh Kupershmidt:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@bfk.de wrote:
I've been looking around in the 9.0 documentation, but couldn't find the
permission requirements for LOCK TABLE (in particular, LOCK TABLE IN
SHARE MODE). From the source, you need at least one of
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:39 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Aleksey Tsalolikhin atsaloli.t...@gmail.com:
We use the fine Bucardo check_postgres Nagios plugin,
and it reported a CRITICAL level spike in database locks
(171 locks).
I looked closely at my database logs and
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:39, Craig Ringer cr...@postnewspapers.com.au wrote:
On 30/06/2011 12:42 AM, Michael Gould wrote:
Grace the ossp-uuid libraries have no make system to create a 64 bit version
and I guess there are some technical reasons with the compiler. You can run
them on Linux
Hi,
i am trying to obtain from the database what we have been doing in a excel
sheet from some time.
I have some tables where i store the documents associated with our customers,
invoices, payments and others, what i need to get from this tables it is a
movement log where i can get what
On 30/06/2011 9:00 PM, Linos wrote:
how could i calculate this pending column that does not exists in the
database and i need to be based on last result row? I would like to
get with raw SQL but the need to use any procedural language would not
be a problem.
Without knowing how you've
sorry, i have more searching for a way to do something like this but i should
have posted the tables anyway, i have any more documents but all have a
structure like this:
invoices:
CREATE TABLE factura
(
id_factura serial NOT NULL, -- invoice id
id_cliente integer NOT NULL, --
Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Linos
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 9:00 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] question about query
Hi,
i am trying to obtain from the database what
Hey Hiroshi,
Do you have a make file to compile for x64 windows?
May be if that is made available then ossp-uuid for x64 versions will
become standard.
*Grace Batumbya*
Research Assistant | Seneca CDOT
Phone: 416-491-5050 x3548
cdot.senecac.on.ca http://cdot.senecac.on.ca/
On 6/29/2011 1:02
Hi!
I asked same thing in the list formerly,
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2011-06/msg00888.php
And because of lack of answers now I asked here also:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6534654/postgresql-session-timeout
I'm very wondering that I don't (and can't) found a system
hi,
is it correct behavior that when i issue command VACUUM VERBOSE, i get
output with DETAIL info, but when i issue VACUUM FULL VERBOSE, no
details are displayed?
here are some samples:
VACUUM VERBOSE;
INFO: vacuuming pg_catalog.pg_type
INFO: scanned index pg_type_oid_index to remove 540 row
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 04:11:32PM +0200, Durumdara wrote:
Hi!
I asked same thing in the list formerly,
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2011-06/msg00888.php
I'm very wondering that I don't (and can't) found a system variable
that define the timeout of the client session. Maybe
Hi Grace-san.
It is the same as windows.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/
1. Deployment of tar.gz
2. apply the patch
3. configure and build by Linux or MinGW
4. config.h and win32.mak are set at the head of a source tree.
5. nmake -f win32.mak
It can be used by 32 bits and 64 bits.
El 30/06/11 15:44, David Johnston escribió:
Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Linos
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 9:00 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] question about query
Hi,
So, I needed to build a special PG, for use with xTuple (an ERP). I got the
8.4.4 source, dumped it in a directory in my home, and put the executable out
on a non-standard directory on one of my SSD.
Reading Greg Smith's High Performance... book, suggested that I needed the
postgresql-contrib
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:46 -0400, gnuo...@rcn.com wrote:
I'll need the contrib source, and I don't find it anywhere. I must not be
looking in the right place.
Where might that be?
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
In response to Durumdara durumd...@gmail.com:
Hi!
I asked same thing in the list formerly,
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2011-06/msg00888.php
And because of lack of answers now I asked here also:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6534654/postgresql-session-timeout
I'm
D'oh! I didn't recall that it was packaged together, but the contrib source
isn't in src, where I looked. Oh well.
thanks,
Robert
Original message
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:04:43 -0400
From: Reid Thompson reid.thomp...@ateb.com
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Contrib source
To:
El 30/06/11 15:44, David Johnston escribió:
Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Linos
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 9:00 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] question about query
Hi,
Hi!
2011/6/30 Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com:
In response to Durumdara durumd...@gmail.com:
Session ends when the connection is terminated. I.e., a PostgreSQL
session is synonymous with a TCP connection (or domain socket in some
cases).
In Windows OS what's this meaning?
I know there
In response to Durumdara durumd...@gmail.com:
Hi!
2011/6/30 Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com:
In response to Durumdara durumd...@gmail.com:
Session ends when the connection is terminated. I.e., a PostgreSQL
session is synonymous with a TCP connection (or domain socket in some
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, gnuo...@rcn.com wrote:
D'oh! I didn't recall that it was packaged together, but the contrib
source isn't in src, where I looked. Oh well.
IIt's not a separate file, there should be a contrib subdirectory in the
source code file.
However, if you're using a
I just got wholly confused. Synaptic makes it appear that *contrib is a
separate entity. And the source isn't in a src subdirectory, but in the
contrib directory directly. If I built PG on a regular basis, I might remember
all this.
The xTuple folks only support a few PG releases, and with
On Thursday, June 30, 2011 9:48:57 am gnuo...@rcn.com wrote:
I just got wholly confused. Synaptic makes it appear that *contrib is a
separate entity. And the source isn't in a src subdirectory, but in the
contrib directory directly. If I built PG on a regular basis, I might
remember all
2011/6/30 Miroslav Šulc miroslav.s...@startnet.cz:
is it correct behavior that when i issue command VACUUM VERBOSE, i get
output with DETAIL info, but when i issue VACUUM FULL VERBOSE, no
details are displayed?
Yes, this seems OK. PostgreSQL 9.0 has a new implementation of VACUUM
FULL, which
Hello.
I need to create an auto-increment field on a table WITHOUT using sequences:
CREATE TABLE tbl(
name TEXT,
uniq_id INTEGER
);
Each INSERT to this table must generate a new uniq_id which is distinct from
all others.
The problem is that these INSERTs are rolled back oftenly (i.e. they
Hello,
This is an ugly hack. Try to have a temporary holder that carries the maximum
value. for example create a table with a one columnn and certainly one row
and synchronize this value with your sequence
Regards
From: Dmitry Koterov dmi...@koterov.ru
On Jun 30, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Dmitry Koterov wrote:
Hello.
I need to create an auto-increment field on a table WITHOUT using sequences:
This problem pops up a lot for invoice sequence numbers for the tax office and
related cases. (Search for gapless sequence.)
Since the numbers are really
Thank you.
It may not be fully gapless. The main cause is to keep uniq_id as low as
it could be to not to exhaust 10 values too fast.
I think solutions with addition tables look too complicated for this case,
is there a possiblilty to not to use an additional table?
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dmitry Koterov
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 2:41 PM
To: Postgres General
Subject: [GENERAL] How to create auto-increment field WITHOUT a sequence
object?
Hello.
I need to create an
Original Message From: Dmitry Koterov
I need to create an auto-increment field on a table WITHOUT using
sequences:
You may get some ideas at http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/130.php
George
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
Hello.
I need to create an auto-increment field on a table WITHOUT using sequences:
CREATE TABLE tbl(
name TEXT,
uniq_id INTEGER
);
Each INSERT to this table must generate a new uniq_id which is distinct from
all others.
The problem is that these INSERTs are rolled back oftenly (i.e. they
Hey Dmitry,
2011/6/30 Dmitry Koterov dmitry.kote...@gmail.com
Hello.
I need to create an auto-increment field on a table WITHOUT using
sequences:
CREATE TABLE tbl(
name TEXT,
uniq_id INTEGER
);
Each INSERT to this table must generate a new uniq_id which is distinct
from all
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Dmitry Koterov dmi...@koterov.ru wrote:
Hello.
I need to create an auto-increment field on a table WITHOUT using sequences:
CREATE TABLE tbl(
name TEXT,
uniq_id INTEGER
);
Each INSERT to this table must generate a new uniq_id which is distinct from
all
Thanks to all, I'll try to live with this solution.
(It is not ideal, but pretty good for my case.)
The better way may be to create an additional table with ANY structure and
no data and LOCK using it, but not the tbl table. It theoretically
decrease race conditions - the only thing which I need
On 06/30/2011 03:01 PM, Dmitry Koterov wrote:
It may not be fully gapless. The main cause is to keep uniq_id as
low as it could be to not to exhaust 10 values too fast.
I think solutions with addition tables look too complicated for this
case, is there a possiblilty to not to use an
Ok - loaded up Linux - fun stuff.
Figured out how to get the code PostgreSQL version 9.0.4 - Have that in a
directory.
Got the patch from above...
Placed into same directory.
Loaded the dependents for the final compile and install with .configure.
BUT
When I run the patch I'm getting some
On 07/01/2011 12:48 AM, gnuo...@rcn.com wrote:
I just got wholly confused. Synaptic makes it appear that *contrib is a
separate entity. And the source isn't in a src subdirectory, but in the
contrib directory directly.
Debian, like most distros, produces several binary packages from a
On 07/01/2011 02:20 AM, Dmitry Koterov wrote:
The problem is that these INSERTs are rolled back oftenly (i.e. they
are executed within a transaction block which is rolled back time to
time), this is an existing design of the current architecture and
unfortunately we have to live with it. And
Never-mind I'll just do it by hand.
-
Warmest regards,
Casey Havenor
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Inheritence-issue-scheme-advice-tp4536626p4540532.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via
Having done gapless numbering for some users of accounting software,
there are two suggestions I would make.
The first is that any sort of gapless numbering inherently runs into
scalability. You HAVE to lock relevant records, and this means that
only one insert can run at a time, and it must
Yeah, I didn't realize that contrib source is in regular source download, nor
did I notice that Synaptic was installing its own version of PG. The bulb
wasn't lit. In all, I think I should have had two installs of PG; the one I
built from source way back when (and stored out of standard
41 matches
Mail list logo
