Andy Colson wrote:
I am in the middle of a process to get all my data into utf8. As its
not all converted yet, my database encoding is SQL_ASCII.
I am getting external apps fixed up to write utf8 to the database, and
so far so good. But, I ran across some stuff that needs a one time
On 11/17/2011 02:24 PM, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
This query is taking much longer on 9.1 than it did on 8.4. Why is it
using a seq scan?
To answer that question in all cases, it's necessary to know a) the
query, b) the PostgreSQL version, c) the table definitions including
what indexes
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 02:32:22PM -0700, J.V. wrote:
How is this accomplished?
Is it possible to log queries to a table with additional information?
1) num rows returned (if a select)
2) time to complete the query
3) other info?
How is enabling this actually done?
please check:
On 18 Listopad 2011, 11:39, Greg Smith wrote:
On 11/17/2011 02:24 PM, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
This query is taking much longer on 9.1 than it did on 8.4. Why is it
using a seq scan?
To answer that question in all cases, it's necessary to know a) the
query, b) the PostgreSQL version, c) the
Thanks!
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 3:41:22 pm deepak wrote:
Hi !
Although, it is not clear what options I have to use while
building/configuring?
This same configuration used to work with Postgres 9.0.3,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Steve Crawford
scrawf...@pinpointresearch.com wrote:
Database only? Or is it also your webserver?
It's my webserver and DB. Webserver is nginx, proxying all PHP
requests to apache in the backend.
What version of PostgreSQL? What OS? What OS tuning, if any,
On 18/11/11 12:30, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
I've currently disabled any INSERT functions on my website...but even
with disabled INSERTs and only SELECTs alive, I still see the psql:
FATAL: sorry, too many clients already message.
As Tomas has said, this is nothing to do with inserts and
On 12 November 2011 00:08, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 11 November 2011 23:28, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
On 11 November 2011 00:55, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
I just noticed that the VACUUM process
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
On 11 November 2011 23:28, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I observe that _bt_delitems_vacuum() unconditionally dirties the page
and writes a WAL record, whether it has anything to do or not; and that
if XLogStandbyInfoActive() then btvacuumscan will indeed
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
On 11 November 2011 23:28, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I observe that _bt_delitems_vacuum() unconditionally dirties the page
and writes a WAL record, whether it has anything to do or
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
On 11 November 2011 23:28, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I observe that _bt_delitems_vacuum() unconditionally dirties the page
and writes a WAL record, whether it has anything to do or
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Well, it's expected given the current coding in the btree vacuum logic.
It's not clear to me why it was written like that, though.
The code works as designed.
_bt_delitems_vacuum()
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
What Thom's complaining about is that the buffer may be marked dirty
unnecessarily, ie when there has been no actual data change.
OK, I'll patch it.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL
Thanks, guys!
I'll take a closer look at the information_schema and pgAdmin and
Maestro. Reinventing the wheel isn't a problem as this job is not
critical, but the educational experience in looking at the system from
another POV may be the bigger prize.
- Bill
On 11/17/2011 8:34 PM, David
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Bill Thoen bth...@gisnet.com wrote:
Thanks, guys!
I'll take a closer look at the information_schema and pgAdmin and Maestro.
Reinventing the wheel isn't a problem as this job is not critical, but the
educational experience in looking at the system from
See the other remark in this thread about GROUP BY and ORDER BY. Note
that GROUP BY used to cause ORDER BY every time, because it was always
implemented with a sort. That hasn't been true for several releases,
and if you're relying on that side effect it could be the cause of
this, although
The query as shown does't actually have an ORDER BY clause in it;
did you write GROUP BY where you meant ORDER BY?
Thank you for your reply. I tried all combinations
- GROUP BY
- ORDER BY
- GROUP BY ORDER BY
the result is always the same.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
On 11/18/2011 04:30 AM, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Steve Crawford
scrawf...@pinpointresearch.com wrote:
Database only? Or is it also your webserver?
It's my webserver and DB. Webserver is nginx, proxying all PHP
requests to apache in the backend.
You still
I just ran the upgrade process for updating my PostgreSQL installation
(running on Windows XP) from 8.3.14 to 8.3.16. I used pgInstaller's
UPGRADE script to conduct the upgrade. It appeared to work without
problems.
When I tried to verify that the upgrade took place, I noticed
Hi:
How can I search on a csv list of values using like where each value is to be
appended with a wildcarded string?
Example:
list = 'jo,mo,do,fo'
I want to pull all names from a table with name like.. 'jol%' or 'mol%'
or'dol%' or 'sol%'
would match jolly, molly, moleman,dollface, solarboy
I tried to install latest PostgreSql on plain Debian using instructions from
http://backports-master.debian.org/Instructions/
I added line described there to sources and tried
root@EEPOLDB01:~# apt-get -t squeeze-backports install postgresql-9.1
Reading package lists... Done Building
On 18/11/2011 19:59, Andrus wrote:
I tried to install latest PostgreSql on plain Debian using instructions from
http://backports-master.debian.org/Instructions/
I added line described there to sources and tried
root@EEPOLDB01 mailto:root@EEPOLDB01:~# apt-get -t squeeze-backports
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Gauthier, Dave
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 2:56 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] How to use like with a list
Hi:
How can I search on a csv list of values using like
On 11/18/11 11:55 AM, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
Hi:
How can I search on a csv list of values using like where each value
is to be appended with a wildcarded string?
Example:
list = 'jo,mo,do,fo'
I want to pull all names from a table with name like.. 'jo*l%*' or
'mo*l%*' or'do*l%*' or
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:13 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
where field ~ '^(jo|mo|do|fo)'
Don't forget to add the l as the end:
where field ~ '^(jo|mo|do|fo)l'
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make
On 11/18/11 12:18 PM, Richard Broersma wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:13 PM, John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote:
where field ~ '^(jo|mo|do|fo)'
Don't forget to add the l as the end:
where field ~ '^(jo|mo|do|fo)l'
ah, yeah, that.
and to complete the original requirement...
The example was a general case. It won't be jo and mo and fo. In fact, the
values will be stored in a csv perl scalar.
If you know perl...
$str = jo,mo,do,fo;
Using DBI, I need to prepare a query that will accept a string like the one
above.
So...
select name,age,weight from people_table
On 11/18/11 12:37 PM, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
bi_dev=# select name from test where name ~ '^(' || replace('jo,mo,do,fo', ',',
'|') || ')l';
ERROR: argument of WHERE must be type boolean, not type text
ah, needs () around the right side of the ~ expression, not sure why.
does ~ have higher
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Gauthier, Dave
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 3:37 PM
To: John R Pierce; PostgreSQL
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] How to use like with a list
The example was a general case. It
On 11/18/11 12:47 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
does ~ have higher expression priority than || or something?
speaking of...
the precedence table [1] seems somewhat short of operators... the regex
operators like ~ ~* etc aren't on there, nor is string concatenation ||
... I'd expect the regex
Clark C. Evans c...@clarkevans.com writes:
Hello all!
Our company has some headaches in our application development
and deployment process. The chief problem is, creating stages,
which to this audience is, cloning a database efficiently,
making and testing a few changes, perhaps
What are some of my options for dumping data / constraints out of SQL
Server and importing to PostgreSQL 9.x?
I can probably recreate the schema in PostgreSQL with a tool and make
sure all constraints are there ( 100 tables ), but want to know the
best way to get data over.
Text or number
BINGO !
Thanks :-)
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 3:47 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] How to use like with a list
On 11/18/11
On 18/11/11 04:59, Tom Lane wrote:
Craig Ringerring...@ringerc.id.au writes:
On Nov 17, 2011 1:32 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If it's purely an insert-only table, such as a logging table, then in
principle you only need periodic ANALYZEs and not any VACUUMs.
Won't a VACUUM FREEZE
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Gavin Flower gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz
wrote:
On 18/11/11 04:59, Tom Lane wrote:
Craig Ringerring...@ringerc.id.au writes:
On Nov 17, 2011 1:32 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If it's purely an insert-only table, such as a logging table, then
Ray,
thank you.
Did you do apt-get update after adding the line to the source list?
Yes I tried. I tried it again and it looks like the instructons provided in
debian site are invalid.
How to fix ?
Andrus.
root@EEPOLDB01:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb
Ray,
Did you do apt-get update after adding the line to the source list?
I fixed this but now another issue arises.
Installaton fails with error below.
How to fix this ?
root@EEPOLDB01:~# apt-get install postgresql-9.1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
On Friday, November 18, 2011 2:59:44 pm Andrus wrote:
Ray,
thank you.
Did you do apt-get update after adding the line to the source list?
Yes I tried. I tried it again and it looks like the instructons provided in
debian site are invalid.
How to fix ?
Take out the www.
Adrian,
thank you. I'm sorry for stupid mistake.
I uninstalled 8.4. Trying to install 9.1 now returns
root@EEPOLDB01:~# apt-get install postgresql-9.1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean
On Friday, November 18, 2011 3:15:01 pm Andrus wrote:
Adrian,
thank you. I'm sorry for stupid mistake.
I uninstalled 8.4. Trying to install 9.1 now returns
How did you uninstall 8.4?
From below it would seem it is still around.
Andrus.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@gmail.com
--
Hi!
It appears that when I try to configure listen_addresses in postgresql.conf
(on Windows)
with '0.0.0.0' , pg_ctl doesn't properly detect that server has started and
blocks forever.
C:\pg\pgsqlbin\pg_ctl.exe -D data -w start
waiting for server to
How did you uninstall 8.4?
From below it would seem it is still around.
Thank you.
After adding -t switch to apt-get I was able to install 9.1.
To start it I invoked /etc/init.d/postgresql manually.
How to force it to start after server is rebooted automatically ?
free -g returns
Thank you for your response...
Foreign tables in 9.1 are read-only, so you can't write to them. Making
foreign tables writable is a TODO item, but ISTM it's difficult to
implement it for even 9.2. So the answer to your question 1a) is No.
BTW, I'm interested in your use case very much
Hi.
I use CentOS 5, 64bit.
PG is 9.0.5.
I did yum install pgbouncer and got this:
---
Running Transaction
Installing : libevent
1/2
Installing : pgbouncer
2/2
44 matches
Mail list logo
