On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 18:51 -0700, leaf_yxj wrote:
create one function to let other user execute vacuum command. got such an
error. Please help. Thanks. Regards . Grace
rrp= create function vacuum_f ( tablename char(100))
Returns char(100) AS $$
On 28 Mar 2012, at 07:44, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 18:51 -0700, leaf_yxj wrote:
create one function to let other user execute vacuum command. got such an
error. Please help. Thanks. Regards . Grace
rrp= create function vacuum_f ( tablename char(100))
Hi,
I can start and stop backup mode with pg_start_backup() and
pg_stop_backup().
Is there any function like pg_is_in_backup() to tell if the mode has
been enabled?
(I can't find anything in the 9.1 docs)
Cheers,
Toby
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
I am using javaScript app and PostgreSQL database. I have car_alert as a
table contains id (FK of cars table) and userid (FK of users table)
each car has a status ( status column in cars table ).
car_alert is updating and having new records (car id and userid ) every time
user choose car to be
On 28/03/12 12:40, Albert wrote:
I am using javaScript app and PostgreSQL database. I have car_alert as a
table contains id (FK of cars table) and userid (FK of users table)
each car has a status ( status column in cars table ).
car_alert is updating and having new records (car id and userid )
Ken Brush wrote:
I notice that the documentation at:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Binary_Replication_Tutorial
Doesn't contain steps in a Multiple Slave setup for re-establishing
them after a slave has become the new master.
Based on the documentation, here are the most fail-proof steps
Hi,Would like to submit patch on this TO Do list item which deals with psql client, "psql : Allow processing of multiple -f (file) options ".The code base which I am working on is from postgres 9.1.3 release.But when I diff the code base from git repository, the changes are far different from
They seem to claim up to 70% speed gain.
Did anyone proved it, tested it - with PostgreSQL in particular ?
They seem to run the same way as RHEL do, ie - you can download it for
free, but pay for repo access. (thus updates).
--
GJ
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
On 28 Březen 2012, 16:38, Gregg Jaskiewicz wrote:
They seem to claim up to 70% speed gain.
Did anyone proved it, tested it - with PostgreSQL in particular ?
They do claim a lot of things, and most of the time it's along the lines
Let's take this very specific case, let's assume these rather
I was asked to write a security definer function to make other user can issue
vacuum and analyze command? Friends in this community said vacuum doesn't
work inside the function or multi command. How about analyze. I know vacuum
is something much like oracle shrink which is used to reorganize the
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:24 AM, leaf_yxj leaf_...@163.com wrote:
I was asked to write a security definer function to make other user can issue
vacuum and analyze command? Friends in this community said vacuum doesn't
work inside the function or multi command. How about analyze. I know vacuum
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
On 28 BÅezen 2012, 16:38, Gregg Jaskiewicz wrote:
They seem to claim up to 70% speed gain.
Did anyone proved it, tested it - with PostgreSQL in particular ?
I really don't expect such difference just due to switching to a different
kernel. There's a space
On 03/28/2012 08:24 AM, leaf_yxj wrote:
I was asked to write a security definer function to make other user can issue
vacuum and analyze command? Friends in this community said vacuum doesn't
work inside the function or multi command. How about analyze. I know vacuum
is something much like
On 28 March 2012 16:30, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
On 28 Březen 2012, 16:38, Gregg Jaskiewicz wrote:
They seem to claim up to 70% speed gain.
Did anyone proved it, tested it - with PostgreSQL in particular ?
I really don't expect such difference
On 28 Březen 2012, 17:44, Thom Brown wrote:
On 28 March 2012 16:30, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz writes:
On 28 Březen 2012, 16:38, Gregg Jaskiewicz wrote:
They seem to claim up to 70% speed gain.
Did anyone proved it, tested it - with PostgreSQL in particular
I want to create a function which use to truncate the table specified by the
caller. I very confused how postgresql pass this parameter into the function
:
as a superuser to execute :
1)
create or replace function d() returns void as $$
analyze;
$$ language sql;
- this works when i issue
I want to create a function which use to truncate the table specified by the
caller. I very confused how postgresql pass this parameter into the function
:
as a superuser to execute :
1)
create or replace function d() returns void as $$
analyze;
$$ language sql;
- this works when i
Hello
parameter - $n cannot be used on table name or column name position.
Some statements - DROP, VACUUM, ANALYZE doesn't support parameters
ever.
You have to use dynamic SQL in these cases.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo(tablename text, value text)
RETURNS void AS $$
BEGIN
EXECUTE 'insert
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:18 AM, leaf_yxj leaf_...@163.com wrote:
I want to create a function which use to truncate the table specified by the
caller. I very confused how postgresql pass this parameter into the function
:
as a superuser to execute :
1)
create or replace function d()
Pavel,
Thanks a lot.
Regards.
Grace
At 2012-03-29 00:27:12,Pavel Stehule [via PostgreSQL]
ml-node+s1045698n5601077...@n5.nabble.com wrote:
Hello
parameter - $n cannot be used on table name or column name position.
Some statements - DROP, VACUUM, ANALYZE doesn't support parameters
ever.
For oracle, the normal user can't see all the system catalog. but for
postgresql, it looks like all the user can see the system catalog. Should
we limit the user read privilege to system catalog?
In oracle, the system privilege has create table, create view,create
function. For postgresql
On version:
PostgreSQL 9.1.2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC)
4.4.5 20110214 (Red Hat 4.4.5-6), 64-bit
I get this error (all code at end of post) in pgAdmin:
NOTICE: bpa inbound (,now_plus_30)
CONTEXT: SQL statement select now_plus_30(NEW)
PL/pgSQL function
For oracle, the normal user can't see all the system catalog. but for
postgresql, it looks like all the user can see the system catalog. Should
we limit the user read privilege to system catalog?
In oracle, the system privilege has create table, create view,create
function. For postgresql
First, apologies for being too succinct. I should have reiterated the
message subject to provide the context: I am just trying to return a row
from a function and have the caller understand it. Oh, and I am a nooby so
it is probably something daft.
Second, I just tried returning the row as an out
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Kenneth Tilton ktil...@mcna.net wrote:
First, apologies for being too succinct. I should have reiterated the
message subject to provide the context: I am just trying to return a row
from a function and have the caller understand it. Oh, and I am a nooby so
it
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:54 AM, leaf_yxj leaf_...@163.com wrote:
For oracle, the normal user can't see all the system catalog. but for
postgresql, it looks like all the user can see the system catalog. Should
we limit the user read privilege to system catalog?
Yeah, postgresql tends to
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Kenneth Tilton ktil...@mcna.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Kenneth Tilton ktil...@mcna.net wrote:
First, apologies for being too succinct. I should have reiterated the
message subject to provide the context: I am just trying to return a row
from
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Kenneth Tilton ktil...@mcna.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Kenneth Tilton ktil...@mcna.net
wrote:
First, apologies for being too succinct. I should have reiterated
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Kenneth Tilton ktil...@mcna.net wrote:
Thanks, Merlin. Maybe I have some subtle detail wrong. When
NEW.warn_time_init is 'now_plus_30' and I have this as my execute statement:
execute NEW.warn_time_init || '($1)' into bpa using NEW;
...I get:
your'e
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Kenneth Tilton ktil...@mcna.net wrote:
Thanks, Merlin. Maybe I have some subtle detail wrong. When
NEW.warn_time_init is 'now_plus_30' and I have this as my execute
statement:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Kenneth Tilton ktil...@mcna.net wrote:
Well then I have the other error. With this code:
execute 'select ' || NEW.warn_time_init || '($1)' into bpa using NEW;
try this:
select * from now_plus_30(NEW) into bpa;
:-D
merlin
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Kenneth Tilton ktil...@mcna.net wrote:
Well then I have the other error. With this code:
execute 'select ' || NEW.warn_time_init || '($1)' into bpa using NEW;
try this:
select *
On 03/28/2012 09:54 AM, leaf_yxj wrote:
For oracle, the normal user can't see all the system catalog. but for
postgresql, it looks like all the user can see the system catalog. Should
we limit the user read privilege to system catalog?
In oracle, the system privilege has create table, create
There was a hardware crash.
Since then INSERT to one table is failing with the following message:
ERROR: could not read block 11857 of relation base/16396/3720450: read
only 0 of 8192 bytes
ERROR: could not read block 11805 of relation base/16396/3720450: read
only 0 of 8192 bytes
Similar
Hi all,
OS: Linux 64bit
PostgreSQL Version: 9.0.5 installed from source.
I'm writing up a process that will bring down a warm standby cluster,
tarball the data directory, then bring the warm standby back up. I'm
having an issue where starting the database with pg_ctl results in the
command
Interestingly enough, when using a perl system() vs the qx() or
backticks, it doesn't have this behavior. So I've got it working now
with some modifications.
I'm still interested as why I've seen this behavior, a. from a perl qx()
call and b. from an ssh connection from another server.
-
I have queries regarding columns in Postgres CSV Log.
Following is a sample Logline
2012-03-28 19:25:47.968
IST,postgres,stock_apals,2388,localhost:1898,4f731863.954,6,SET,2012-03-28
19:25:47 IST,2/0,0,LOG,0,QUERY
I've got a pretty big database (~30 gigs) and when I do a pg_dump, it ends
up only being 2 gigs.
The database consists mainly of one very large table (w/ a few varchar
columns) which, according to pg_relation_size() is 10 gigs
and pg_total_relation_size() is 26 gigs (we need to drop some indexes
38 matches
Mail list logo
