On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
In general, through, diskchecker.pl is the more sensitive test. If it
fails, storage is unreliable for PostgreSQL, period. It's good that you've
followed up by confirming the real database corruption implied by that is
I have windows vista. I tried to run the installer in admin mode and I disabled
UAC. Still having the same problem.
Any other help will be wellcome :)
Thanks again, and thanks Xiong He.
From: iih...@qq.com
To: raulfp...@hotmail.com; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL]
On 27/10/12 23:30, Raul Feliu wrote:
I have windows vista. I tried to run the installer in admin mode and I
disabled UAC. Still having the same problem.
Any other help will be wellcome :)
Thanks again, and thanks Xiong He.
On 10/27/2012 01:43 AM, D T wrote:
Hi,
I have many functions which i want to finetune. Is there any profiler
available which i can use to check performance of function and finetune it.
Since you haven't specified your PostgreSQL version, platform, the
language the functions are written in, etc
Can you copy C:\Users\Ral\AppData\Local\Temp\prerun_checks.vbs to another
location and verify if it can run without any issue?
Make sure Windows Script Host is installed. and .vbs is associated with it.
--
ThanksRegards,
Xiong He
-- Original
Hi,
I'm currently doing a point in time recovery with a recovery_target_time set.
As it takes quite a while, I was wondering if there is a way to see the
progress in terms of 'realtime' somehow? Is there any way of getting the
timestamp of the last replayed transaction or the like? I know
Hello Arvind,
the cyclic change idea is really marvellous , thank you
You're welcome. :)
but we store each round, because we need player actions for further
analysis about game trends
Normally the different analyze-forms and goals are known from the
beginning. You could use a more
Just came across this one:
http://hammerprinciple.com/databases/items/mysql/postgresql
mySQL is great for embedding in applications though? Have they not read
Oracle's license?
Mike
Hi,
I'm currently doing a point in time recovery with a recovery_target_time set.
As it takes quite a while, I was wondering if there is a way to see the
progress in terms of 'realtime' somehow? Is there any way of getting the
timestamp of the last replayed transaction or the like? I know
Em 27/10/2012 19:18, Mike Christensen escreveu:
Just came across this one:
http://hammerprinciple.com/databases/items/mysql/postgresql
mySQL is great for embedding in applications though? Have they not
read Oracle's license?
Mike
Sorry to say, this site is full of holes. The problem is
On 10/27/2012 5:18 PM, Mike Christensen wrote:
Just came across this one:
http://hammerprinciple.com/databases/items/mysql/postgresql
mySQL is great for embedding in applications though? Have they not
read Oracle's license?
Does it say anywhere on that site if the people surveyed know both
It seems to be based on the honor system. When you click Rank, it asks
you what databases you're familiar with. Then you can stack rank those
databases across various questions. It's possible people could lie and say
they know about mySQL and Postgres when in reality they don't, but
hopefully
On 28/10/12 12:00, Stephen Cook wrote:
On 10/27/2012 5:18 PM, Mike Christensen wrote:
Just came across this one:
http://hammerprinciple.com/databases/items/mysql/postgresql
mySQL is great for embedding in applications though? Have they not
read Oracle's license?
Does it say anywhere on
Søndag 28. oktober 2012 01.17.45 skrev Gavin Flower :
Also note that for features that are obviously complicated or advanced,
Postgres tends to a lot better than MySQL.
It's like comparing BASIC to C. BASIC has a low threshold, but you will very
quickly bump your head against the wall.
On 28/10/12 12:29, Leif Biberg Kristensen wrote:
Søndag 28. oktober 2012 01.17.45 skrev Gavin Flower :
Also note that for features that are obviously complicated or advanced,
Postgres tends to a lot better than MySQL.
It's like comparing BASIC to C. BASIC has a low threshold, but you will
Em 28/10/2012 01:35, Gavin Flower escreveu:
On 28/10/12 12:29, Leif Biberg Kristensen wrote:
Søndag 28. oktober 2012 01.17.45 skrev Gavin Flower :
Also note that for features that are obviously complicated or advanced,
Postgres tends to a lot better than MySQL.
It's like comparing BASIC to
On 28/10/12 16:52, Edson Richter wrote:
Em 28/10/2012 01:35, Gavin Flower escreveu:
On 28/10/12 12:29, Leif Biberg Kristensen wrote:
Søndag 28. oktober 2012 01.17.45 skrev Gavin Flower :
Also note that for features that are obviously complicated or
advanced,
Postgres tends to a lot better
17 matches
Mail list logo
