"David Johnston" writes:
> [optionally go look at " ~* " in the documentation at this point; or just
> try a simple flip-flop of the expression]
> SELECT 'Kumar' ~* 'kuma' -> TRUE !!! (ah ha! I had the order reversed)
> SELECT any( ARRAY['Kumar','Gozales']::text ) ... wait...ANY doesn't work on
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Stephen Touset
wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
>
>> On 12/20/2012 04:33 PM, Stephen Touset wrote:
>>
>>> So yes, AUTOCOMMIT is definitely on.
>>
>> What does \set show when entered from the psql command line?
>
>test=> \set
>AUTOCO
On Dec 20, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
> On 12/20/2012 04:33 PM, Stephen Touset wrote:
>
>> So yes, AUTOCOMMIT is definitely on.
>
> What does \set show when entered from the psql command line?
test=> \set
AUTOCOMMIT = 'OFF'
*facepalm*.
Turns out someone put a .psqlrc with aut
> -Original Message-
> From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Denis Papathanasiou
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:56 PM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: [GENERAL] Using POSIX Regular Expressions on xml type fie
>
> I have a table with an xml type column, and while I can make regex queries
> like this successfully:
>
> => select id from form_d where 'kumar' ~* any(
> CAST(xpath('//PersonsList/PersonName/LastName/text()', data) as TEXT[])
> );
It took me way too long to figure this out:
SELECT 'text to
I have a table with an xml type column, and while I can make regex
queries like this successfully:
=> select id from form_d where 'kumar' ~* any(
CAST(xpath('//PersonsList/PersonName/LastName/text()', data) as TEXT[]) );
id
--
97e1541b-27f
On 12/20/2012 04:33 PM, Stephen Touset wrote:
On Dec 20, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
When on (the default), each SQL command is automatically committed upon
successful completion. To postpone commit in this mode, you must enter a BEGIN
or START TRANSACTION SQL command. When off o
On Dec 20, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> When on (the default), each SQL command is automatically committed upon
> successful completion. To postpone commit in this mode, you must enter a
> BEGIN or START TRANSACTION SQL command. When off or unset, SQL commands are
> not co
On Dec 20, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> When on (the default), each SQL command is automatically committed upon
> successful completion. To postpone commit in this mode, you must enter a
> BEGIN or START TRANSACTION SQL command. When off or unset, SQL commands are
> not committed
On 12/20/2012 03:11 PM, Stephen Touset wrote:
I'm having difficulty locating the source of a problem our webapp has
been running into. Multiple Google searches have failed me, so I'm
hoping someone here can help troubleshoot.
I also don't encounter the issue if I connect to the running 9.2
dae
I'm having difficulty locating the source of a problem our webapp has
been running into. Multiple Google searches have failed me, so I'm
hoping someone here can help troubleshoot.
When some clients (psql, the webapp) connect to our production
database, they become stuck in an aborted transaction a
On 12/20/2012 02:08 PM, Alan Nilsson wrote:
Is there any sql/psql command to force a log roll (i.e. start a new log file)?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/functions-admin.html
pg_rotate_logfile()
alan
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@gmail.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general
Is there any sql/psql command to force a log roll (i.e. start a new log file)?
alan
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 12/20/2012 5:56 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
I'm interested to know how heavy ZFS usage holds up with only 8GB of
kernel memory. Is FreeNAS up to kernel 9.x yet? I haven't followed
FreeNAS for a while. My smallest RAM machine with ZFS has 16GB
and I am *loving* it. I wish it was easier to m
Marti Raudsepp writes:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Robert James wrote:
>> Is there an aggregate that will return an arbitrary instance? That is,
>> not necessarily the max or min, just any one? (Which might perform
>> better than max or min)
>>
>> More importantly:
>> Is there one which w
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Robert James wrote:
> Is there an aggregate that will return an arbitrary instance? That is,
> not necessarily the max or min, just any one? (Which might perform
> better than max or min)
>
> More importantly:
> Is there one which will return an arbitrary instance
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Robert James wrote:
> I see. What if I need to do this along with an Aggregate Query. Eg
> something like:
>
> SELECT x,y,z, MAX(a), MAX(b), DONT_CARE_AS_LONG_AS_NOT_NULL(c),
> DONT_CAR_AS_LONG_AS_P_IS_TRUE(d,p)
> ...
> GROUP BY x,y,z
>
>
ah, I get what you're t
I see. What if I need to do this along with an Aggregate Query. Eg
something like:
SELECT x,y,z, MAX(a), MAX(b), DONT_CARE_AS_LONG_AS_NOT_NULL(c),
DONT_CAR_AS_LONG_AS_P_IS_TRUE(d,p)
...
GROUP BY x,y,z
On 12/20/12, Richard Broersma wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Robert James
> wrote
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Robert James wrote:
> Sergey - That's an interesting option, but I'm not sure how to use it
> as an aggregate. Could you give an example?
>
Here is an example:
buildinghac=>
SELECT itemnbr, buildingnbr
FROM Actionitems
ORDER BY buildingnbr
LIMIT 10;
it
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:14 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> I've got it formatted as RaidZ (ZFS's equivalent of raid5) and have no
> problem hitting 80MB/second over gigE with SMB.Now, I've not yet tested
> iscsi on it.
>
I'm interested to know how heavy ZFS usage holds up with only 8GB of kern
Sergey - That's an interesting option, but I'm not sure how to use it
as an aggregate. Could you give an example?
On 12/20/12, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Robert James
> wrote:
>> And even better:
>> An aggregate which will return the first instance that meets a ce
On 18.12.2012 13:42, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
In pg_log on ubuntu2 I see:
2012-12-18 12:41:34.428 CET [unknown]@[unknown] 1685 LOG: connection
received: host=172.28.173.142 port=45842
2012-12-18 12:41:34.430 CET replication@[unknown] 1685 172.28.173.142(45842)
LOG: replication conne
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Robert James wrote:
> And even better:
> An aggregate which will return the first instance that meets a certain
> predicate?
Take a look at DISTINCT ON.
--
Sergey Konoplev
Database and Software Architect
http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
Phones:
USA +1 415 867
Thanks a lot Glyn.
--- On Wed, 19/12/12, Glyn Astill wrote:
From: Glyn Astill
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum analyze verbose output
To: "Anjali Arora" , "pgsql-general@postgresql.org"
Date: Wednesday, 19 December, 2012, 3:19 PM
> From: Anjali Arora
>To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>Sent:
24 matches
Mail list logo
