Sorry for the delay.
No it does not exist.
ls -l /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_clog/0B8E
ls: /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_clog/0B8E: No such file or directory
Have 92 files in directory which are all 262144 in size.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 2013-04-24, Stephen Scheck singularsyn...@gmail.com wrote:
--f46d043c810aa794a404db21f464
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Possibly due to my lack of thorough SQL understanding. Perhaps there's a
better way of doing what I'm ultimately trying to accomplish, but still the
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Darren Duncan dar...@darrenduncan.netwrote:
On 2013.04.24 7:16 PM, � wrote:
Maybe you must see this extension [1] ;-)
[1]
http://pgxn.org/dist/session_**variables/http://pgxn.org/dist/session_variables/
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Thanks for your response.
SELECT DISTINCT a, b, c, array_agg(k.d) OVER (PARTITION BY k.c ) FROM
testy k where k.e 'email' and k.c='1035049' ORDER BY a, b, c, e
If doesnt work - Probably there is a better option...
In worst case I would do
SELECT DISTINCT a, b, c, array_agg(d) OVER (PARTITION BY c ) FROM
(
SELECT
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Stephen Scheck
singularsyn...@gmail.com wrote:
Possibly due to my lack of thorough SQL understanding. Perhaps there's a
better way of doing what I'm ultimately trying to accomplish, but still the
question remains - why does this work:
pg_dev=# select
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Rafał Pietrak ra...@zorro.isa-geek.com wrote:
W dniu 03/24/2013 12:11 PM, Rafał Pietrak pisze:
W dniu 03/24/2013 12:06 PM, Misa Simic pisze:
maybe,
SELECT DISTINCT issuer,amount, array_agg(REFERENCE) over (partition by
invoice_nr) from invoices;
RIGHT.
If its really index corruption, then you should be able to fix it by
reindexing. However, that doesn't explain what caused the corruption.
Perhaps your hardware is bad in some way?
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Adarsh Sharma eddy.ada...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Sergey for such a quick
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:13 AM, jesse.wat...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the delay.
No it does not exist.
ls -l /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_clog/0B8E
ls: /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_clog/0B8E: No such file or directory
Have 92 files in directory which are all 262144 in size.
This file records if
Hi,
I am in the process of converting some TEXT data which I try
to identify by regular expression.
What I don't understand is: Why does the following return a
substring ?
select substring ('junk $allergy::test::99$ junk' from
'\$[^]+?::[^:]+?\$');
I would have thought the '::[^:]+?'
On 2013-04-24 19:44:25 -0700, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Adarsh Sharma eddy.ada...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a Postgresql 9.2 instance running on a CentOS6.3 box.Yesterday i
setup a hot standby by using pgbasebackup. Today i got the below alert from
standby box :
Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net writes:
What I don't understand is: Why does the following return a
substring ?
select substring ('junk $allergy::test::99$ junk' from
'\$[^]+?::[^:]+?\$');
There's a perfectly valid match in which [^]+? matches allergy::test
and [^:]+? matches
On 25 April 2013 15:32, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net writes:
What I don't understand is: Why does the following return a
substring ?
select substring ('junk $allergy::test::99$ junk' from
'\$[^]+?::[^:]+?\$');
There's a perfectly valid
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:32:26AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net writes:
What I don't understand is: Why does the following return a
substring ?
select substring ('junk $allergy::test::99$ junk' from
'\$[^]+?::[^:]+?\$');
There's a perfectly
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 03:40:51PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
On 25 April 2013 15:32, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net writes:
What I don't understand is: Why does the following return a
substring ?
select substring ('junk
Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net writes:
I would have thought [^]+?: should mean:
match a
followed by 1-n characters as long as they are not
until the VERY NEXT :
The ? should make the + after [^] non-greedy and thus
stop at the first occurrence of :, right ? Or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
manos tsahakis wrote:
In our application we are enabling session_replication_role TO 'replica' in
certain situations so that triggers will not fire in a table during DML
operations. However, we observed that when setting
Just tried upgrading and added the apt-postgresql.org repo to my
Debian server (on testing now) and I got some backages like barman
retained because some dependencies couldn't be satisfied.
Los siguientes paquetes tienen dependencias incumplidas:
barman : Depende: python ( 2.7) pero 2.7.3-4 va a
W dniu 04/25/2013 03:44 PM, Merlin Moncure pisze:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Rafał Pietrak ra...@zorro.isa-geek.com wrote:
W dniu 03/24/2013 12:11 PM, Rafał Pietrak pisze:
W dniu 03/24/2013 12:06 PM, Misa Simic pisze:
maybe,
SELECT DISTINCT issuer,amount, array_agg(REFERENCE) over
Ok, I tried to be clever and I wrote code to avoid inserting duplicate data.
The calling function has a try-catch to recover from this, but I am curious
as to why it failed:
INSERT INTO
mdx_lib.acache_mdx_logic_address_validation
(
address,
postal_code,
address_id
Carlo Stonebanks stonec.regis...@sympatico.ca writes:
Ok, I tried to be clever and I wrote code to avoid inserting duplicate data.
The calling function has a try-catch to recover from this, but I am curious
as to why it failed:
There's nothing obviously wrong with that, which means the issue
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Rafał Pietrak ra...@zorro.isa-geek.com wrote:
W dniu 04/25/2013 03:44 PM, Merlin Moncure pisze:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Rafał Pietrak ra...@zorro.isa-geek.com
wrote:
W dniu 03/24/2013 12:11 PM, Rafał Pietrak pisze:
W dniu 03/24/2013 12:06 PM, Misa
Hi,
PostgreSQL 9.2.2, Ubuntu 11.10, Linux 3.0.0.
A couple of days ago I noticed a strange output from a cron command I
use to terminate long transactions.
psql --no-psqlrc --single-transaction -d
postgres -t -c SELECT
pg_terminate_backend(pid),now(),now()-xact_start as duration,* from
Hello,
I have a user defined aggregate function and in Sfunc I need to
reference current row number relative to window frame. Ideallly I would like to
have following construct:
select my_aggregate(x,current_row_number_relative_to window) over
(order by y rows between n preceding and current
Sorry my bad , didn't mention the full DB version :
9.2.4.8 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.1.2
20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-52), 64-bit
Apart from these i am happy to inform , the issue is fixed now.
Actually there are two Slave set up's on the standby box on different
ports and
24 matches
Mail list logo
