On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:49 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
its looking for the RPM installed packages it was linked against. its not
looking to see if any same named files just happen to be on your system.
Oh, got it. So the only way is to do bless it thru 'yum install
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Richard Onorato
richard_onor...@yahoo.comwrote:
Were you able to get it to insert with the bigserial being used on the
table?
Yes.
Every time I go to do an insert into one of the inherited tables I am now
getting the following exception:
Hi,
I am using postgresql 8.1 (CentOS5). I have the following table:
system # \d history
Table public.history
Column | Type | Modifiers
Antonio Goméz Soto wrote:
I am using postgresql 8.1 (CentOS5). I have the following table:
system # \d history
Table public.history
Column | Type | Modifiers
You might want to try with UNION and then sort the result of this query.
The index history_lookup_lookupid_creator_index wont be used when you are
having an OR in your WHERE statement.
select history.id, history.created, creator, contact, history.type, lookup,
lookupid, value
from history
hello , I'm restoring a 7 days ago full backup + wal files. I have to
recover more than 6k wal files and I have no time, I would accept to work
with a ~ 3 days ago snapshot, can I stop the recovery process and start the
server?, if yes, how?
My recovery.conf file only has this line :
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Fabio Rueda Carrascosa
avances...@gmail.com wrote:
hello , I'm restoring a 7 days ago full backup + wal files. I have to
recover more than 6k wal files and I have no time, I would accept to work
with a ~ 3 days ago snapshot, can I stop the recovery process
Can I stop the server and modify recovery.conf with this param and restart
it again without problems?
Thanks a lot.
2013/5/22 Raghavendra raghavendra@enterprisedb.com
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Fabio Rueda Carrascosa
avances...@gmail.com wrote:
hello , I'm restoring a 7 days ago
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Fabio Rueda Carrascosa
avances...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I stop the server and modify recovery.conf with this param and restart
it again without problems?
It should work. (Sorry I never tried this, like stopping in middle of the
recovery and restarting with
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Raghavendra
raghavendra@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Fabio Rueda Carrascosa
avances...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I stop the server and modify recovery.conf with this param and
restart it again without problems?
It should work.
you can use pg_xlog_replay_pause(),pg_xlog_replay_resume() to control the
wal replay.
ref doc:http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/functions-admin.html
2013/5/22 Raghavendra raghavendra@enterprisedb.com
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Raghavendra
raghavendra@enterprisedb.com
Leif,
of course. This performs much better (far below one second).
Thanks!
Antonio
Op 22-05-13 11:28, Leif Gunnar Erlandsen schreef:
You might want to try with UNION and then sort the result of this query.
The index history_lookup_lookupid_creator_index wont be used when you are
having
PostgreSQL 9.1.6 on linux
Original Message
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Very slow inner join query Unacceptable latency.
From: Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com
Date: Tue, May 21, 2013 2:59 pm
To: Freddie Burgess fburg...@radiantblue.com
Cc: psql performance list
I have a database that is on a RAID5 machine that is almost out of memory
(277GB of 330GB used). I have deleted some data and run the VACUUM FULL
command, but after a few hours gave me the error message Server closed the
connection unexpectedly. This probably means the server terminated
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, RDNikeAir ryan.dup...@excelitas.com wrote:
I have a database that is on a RAID5 machine that is almost out of memory
(277GB of 330GB used). I have deleted some data and run the VACUUM FULL
command, but after a few hours gave me the error message Server closed
Interestingly enough all the pgsql.log.* files are blank (0 KB) and the last
message i have in messages.* is from a few days ago. So there are no recent
entries that i can look at.
--
View this message in context:
I'm not sure if this is a bug, or something I'm not understanding. When I
have a column referenced in the select both fully qualified and not fully
qualified, an explicit inner join, and that column in the order by
(unqualified, and not in a function call), it complains that is ambiguous:
create
RDNikeAir wrote:
Interestingly enough all the pgsql.log.* files are blank (0 KB) and the last
message i have in messages.* is from a few days ago. So there are no recent
entries that i can look at.
Well, it is clear then that the first thing you need to do is fix your
logging.
--
Álvaro
Hi,
I am trying to declare a cursor with hold along with NO SCROLL option. I am
getting syntax error. Just wondering if CURSOR WITH HOLD option supported. My
code snip is.
DECLARE noncontainer NO SCROLL CURSOR WITH HOLD FOR SELECT * from phostmapping;
NOTE: The code is in plpgsql and
Hello
2013/5/22 Sajeev Mayandi sajeev_maya...@symantec.com:
Hi,
I am trying to declare a cursor with hold along with NO SCROLL option. I
am getting syntax error. Just wondering if CURSOR WITH HOLD option
supported. My code snip is.
DECLARE noncontainer NO SCROLL CURSOR WITH HOLD FOR
Is there a work around to declare the cursor with hold?
Thanks,
Sajeev
On 5/22/13 10:19 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
2013/5/22 Sajeev Mayandi sajeev_maya...@symantec.com:
Hi,
I am trying to declare a cursor with hold along with NO SCROLL option.
I
am getting
Maybe refcursors ??
All what you can do with cursors is described in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/plpgsql-cursors.html
Regards
Pavel
2013/5/22 Sajeev Mayandi sajeev_maya...@symantec.com:
Is there a work around to declare the cursor with hold?
Thanks,
Sajeev
On 5/22/13 10:19
Cody Cutrer c...@instructure.com writes:
create table test1 (id integer, sortable_name varchar);
create table test2 (id integer, test1_id integer);
select test1.sortable_name, sortable_name from test1 inner join test2
on test1.id=test1_id order by sortable_name;
ERROR: ORDER BY sortable_name
Okay, so why does wrapping the order by in a function fix it? (or not doing
a join, or doing an implicit join)
Cody Cutrer
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Cody Cutrer c...@instructure.com writes:
create table test1 (id integer, sortable_name varchar);
On 5/22/2013 11:24 AM, Dev Kumkar wrote:
Started first with looking more into building psqlODBC today
why the heck are you not installing unixODBC-libs from RPMs ?!?
yum install unixODBC64 unixODBC64-libs unixODBC64-devel
should do it, unless you're on Red Hat Enterprise without a
Solution:
The inserts of the foreign key to tb_entity were blocking the updates to
those rows of tb_entity.
I solved the problem by making the foreign key constraints deferrable and
deferring checking on them till the end of the transaction.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Moshe Jacobson
Hi All,
We are facing one strange problem about data file corruptions.
We have many postgres databases. At some point, one simple query on one
database started crashing back-end.
The query is
select count(*), col1 from tab1 group by col1;
After using pg_filedump
On May 21, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 08:52:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 05:05:05PM -0400, Ray Stell wrote:
A minor detail in 9.2.4, but I noticed that the pg_upgrade flag for
superuser, -u, does not get carried to a -U flag on
Hi,
I have the following simple query on a simple table:
system=# select * from history where lookup = 'trunk' and lookupid = '248'
order by created desc limit 1000;
system=# \d history
Table public.history
Column | Type |
On 05/22/2013 02:38 PM, Antonio Goméz Soto wrote:
Limit (cost=0.00..14799.28 rows=1000 width=58) - Index Scan
Backward using history_created_index on history
(cost=0.00..12201987.90 rows=824499 width=58) Filter: ((lookup =
'trunk'::text) AND (lookupid = 248))
It's not using
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:44 AM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
why the heck are you not installing unixODBC-libs from RPMs ?!?
yum install unixODBC64 unixODBC64-libs unixODBC64-devel
should do it, unless you're on Red Hat Enterprise without a subscription,
then you can do it
BTW, pgeu-general is not for technical questions, so moving to
pgsql-general. (I didn't notice the mailing list this came from until
after replying).
On 22.05.2013 18:22, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 22.05.2013 10:23, TJ wrote:
I am looking to migrate my databases from one set of hardware to
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:41 AM, fburg...@radiantblue.com wrote:
PostgreSQL 9.1.6 on linux
From the numbers in your attached plan, it seems like it should be doing a
nested loop from the 580 rows (it thinks) that match in SARS_ACTS_RUN
against the index on sars_run_id to pull out the 3297
Raghavendra,
I am doing my inserts via Java JPA statements embedded in my Data Access Layer.
I can share them if you would like to see them.
Regards,
Richard
From: Raghavendra raghavendra@enterprisedb.com
To: Richard Onorato richard_onor...@yahoo.com
So I worked around most of my errors. I removed the bigserial and used two of
the columns as the primary key. I am now getting the following hibernate
exception back:
Batch update returned unexpected row count from update [0]; actual row count:
0; expected: 1
This appears to be caused by
[snip]
You want me clean some stuff. Because I installed 'unixODBC-2.3.0'?
I guess that if you did a successful make install of unixODBC-2.3.0 it will
work as your ODBC driver manager.
On the other hand, it is easier and more trouble free to use the standardized
package installer for your
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org wrote:
Yes, or, as mentioned before, you can simply download the RPM directly
from the repo.
Thanks Devrim!
Installed postgres-92 server from
postgresql92-server-9.2.4-1PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm, actually links which John
(Thanks!)
On Tue, 21 May 2013 11:40:55 +1000, Toby Corkindale wrote:
While it is important to let the SSD know about space that can be
reclaimed, I gather the operation does not perform well. I *think*
current advice is to leave 'discard' off the mount options, and instead
run a nightly cron job to
From: Dev Kumkar [mailto:devdas.kum...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:33 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: John R Pierce; pgsql-general@postgresql.org; pgsql-o...@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ODBC] [GENERAL] ODBC constructs
[snip]
Thanks for the info. Its Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release
Hi,
(We're running postgres 9.2.X)
from reading
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/storage-file-layout.html the
directories under $PG_DATADIR/data/base should correspond to an actual
database. I've however found a few directories in $PG_DATADIR/data/base
where select datname from
Hi,
I am in the process of creating a rule that provides upsert functionality for
all the tables which has primary key.The issue here is we have some 50 to
60 odd tables and have to write a functions that iterates through all these
tables , create rules for each of this table, so that the
41 matches
Mail list logo
