On Sep 7, 2013, at 6:54, Steve Atkins st...@blighty.com wrote:
On Sep 6, 2013, at 9:37 PM, François Beausoleil franc...@teksol.info wrote:
Le 2013-09-07 à 00:29, Steve Atkins a écrit :
If I have a partitioned table that has some range constraints that look
kinda like they're intended for
On 07/09/2013 01:34, Berend Tober wrote:
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm still partial to this guy:
http://www.commandprompt.com/images/mammoth_versus_dolphin_500.jpg
I dislike that image, and always have. ...
I agree
Dear all
I'm developing a new type, and want to have hash index on it.
I must write a hash function for the new type, according to the PG manual,
section 35.14.3.
However, there is no example for this function. Actually signature of the
hash support function
would be sufficient for me.
Any help
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Raymond O'Donnell r...@iol.ie wrote:
On 07/09/2013 01:34, Berend Tober wrote:
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm still partial to this guy:
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Janek Sendrowski jane...@web.de wrote:
Do you know the destination. I cant find it.
Here it is:
$ find . -name *.[c|h] | xgrep MAX_LEVENSHTEIN_STRLEN
./contrib/fuzzystrmatch/levenshtein.c:#define MAX_LEVENSHTEIN_STRLEN255
Alban Hertroys haram...@gmail.com writes:
On Sep 7, 2013, at 6:54, Steve Atkins st...@blighty.com wrote:
If I have a partitioned table that has some range constraints that look
kinda like they're intended for constraint exclusion, but aren't quite
non-overlapping, will that break anything?
Soroosh Sardari soroosh.sard...@gmail.com writes:
I'm developing a new type, and want to have hash index on it.
I must write a hash function for the new type, according to the PG manual,
section 35.14.3.
However, there is no example for this function. Actually signature of the
hash support
2013-09-06 09:57 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
2013-09-06 02:57 keltezéssel, Wang, Jing írta:
Hi,
ECPG don't support the following scenario:
char cur_name = cur1;
EXEC SQL DECLARE :cur_name CURSOR FOR ...
EXEC SQL OPEN :cur_name;
EXEC SQL FETCH cur1 INTO...
...
EXEC SQL CLOSE
On Sep 7, 2013, at 7:20 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alban Hertroys haram...@gmail.com writes:
On Sep 7, 2013, at 6:54, Steve Atkins st...@blighty.com wrote:
If I have a partitioned table that has some range constraints that look
kinda like they're intended for constraint
