Alex Lai m...@sesda3.com writes:
I have been reading few posted comment about the risk for autovacuum for
older postgres liek version 8.
I am currently running 9.2.4.
autovacuum ignores any system-wide setting of statement_timeout
(and lock_timeout, where applicable) in all versions back to
Hello Dear list,
this is more a plpgsql dev. issue.
I wrote a plpgsql function to compute union of time range taht works :
[1,4]U[3,8]U[12,14]U[16,18] --- [1,8]U[12,14]U[16,18]
It works on multiple rows.
My issue is a design issue :
I want to work on set of row and return set of row.
I am
Hello all,
I have two simple SQL function. The first is defined with the modifier
security definer, while the second is not.
1 create or replace function func_with_sec_definer(param text)
returns setof text as $$
2
3 select unnest(string_to_array(param, ',')) ;
4
5 $$ language
On 12/09/2013 18:16, Karl Denninger wrote:
On 9/12/2013 11:11 AM, Patrick Dung wrote:
While reading some manual of PostgreSQL and MySQL (eg.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/upgrading-from-previous-series.html).
I have found that MySQL has stated many incompatibilities and know
* Ivan Voras (ivo...@freebsd.org) wrote:
If I read the documentation correctly
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/pgupgrade.html), it needs
oldbindir and newbindir arguments pointing to the directories of
PostgreSQL executables for the old and new versions, making it basically
test=*# select extract (year from signup_date)::text || '/' ||
extract(month from signup_date)::text, count(email_address),
sum(count(email_address)) over (ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING) from test
group by 1 order by 1;
Have searched the manual and been unable to find reference to the
commands
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we see a hypothetical example? json best practices for me are to
use standard tables and than serialize/deserialize json as it goes
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Ivan Voras (ivo...@freebsd.org) wrote:
If I read the documentation correctly
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/pgupgrade.html), it needs
oldbindir and newbindir arguments pointing to the directories of
PostgreSQL executables for the old and
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
It would certainly be better if we could straight up deserialize json
into a nested structure. For now, my advise is to try and structure
your json and the receiving types/tables to not be nested. Using your
Il 12/09/2013 22:34, Roberto Scattini ha scritto:
hi, today we discovered that this query doesn't return the expected
values:
SELECT DISTINCT
p.id http://p.id, p.apellido AS Apellido, p.nombre AS Nombre,
pf.nombre AS Funcion, to_char(da.f_ingreso_pg, 'dd/mm/') AS
Fecha Ingreso PG,
hi giuseppe,
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Giuseppe Broccolo
giuseppe.brocc...@2ndquadrant.it wrote:
The problem is the encoding: SQL_ASCII encodes only the first 128
characters, so 'ñ' and 'Ñ' cannot be encoded in ASCII. If you insert text
'ñ' or 'Ñ' in a table inside a database
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
It would certainly be better if we could straight up deserialize json
into a nested structure. For now, my advise is to try and
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:18 AM, e-letter inp...@gmail.com wrote:
test=*# select extract (year from signup_date)::text || '/' ||
extract(month from signup_date)::text, count(email_address),
sum(count(email_address)) over (ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING) from test
group by 1 order by 1;
Have
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup. As things stand currently, it's better *not* to make
serialization-driving composite types which when learning the json
stuff I did heavily; it was a habit I learned (and had to unlearn)
from libpqtypes which
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup. As things stand currently, it's better *not* to make
serialization-driving composite types which when learning the json
stuff I did
Patrick Dung wrote on 13.09.2013 18:17:
The problem of pg_upgrade is that it needed to hold two set of databases data
in the server.
This is not be desirable (very slow) or possible (space limitation) for
database with huge data.
For example, if the old version is already using over 50% of
From: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
To: Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net
Cc: Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
* Ivan Voras
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Patrick Dung patrick_...@yahoo.com.hk wrote:
From: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
To: Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net
Cc: Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 9:58 PM
* Patrick Dung (patrick_...@yahoo.com.hk) wrote:
The problem of pg_upgrade is that it needed to hold two set of databases data
in the server.
What? That's absolutely *not* required for pg_upgrade to work. In
general, I would recommend that you make a copy of the database, but
it's certainly
...have you used the for update clause in your select statements?
Hi Ralf, thanks for the reply. I was unaware of the for update
construct. Thank you!
My understanding is, that for update does what you need.
I've read through the documentation, found a few examples using for
update syntax,
Patrick,
On Friday, September 13, 2013, Patrick Dung wrote:
What? That's absolutely *not* required for pg_upgrade to work. In
general, I would recommend that you make a copy of the database, but
it's certainly not required.
I mean the old version and new version would need to take up disk
9.3 x32 RTM was downloaded from
http://get.enterprisedb.com/postgresql/postgresql-9.3.0-1-windows.exe
in Windows 7 x64 using IE 10
After downloading IE message
The signature of postgresql-9.3.0-1-windows.exe is corrupt or invalid
appears and IE does not allow to run it.
How to install
Before running a script (invoked by .sh that will call stored procs which
may invoke other triggers), I want to capture every change made in the
database which includes the field value before the update and the field
value after the update and also capture all inserts.
With this data, I would be
From: Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net
To: Patrick Dung patrick_...@yahoo.com.hk
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Ivan Voras
ivo...@freebsd.org; Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:43 AM
Subject:
From: Thomas Kellerer spam_ea...@gmx.net
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
Patrick Dung wrote on 13.09.2013 18:17:
The problem of pg_upgrade is that it
From: Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net
To: Patrick Dung patrick_...@yahoo.com.hk
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Ivan Voras
ivo...@freebsd.org; Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us; Stephen Frost
sfr...@snowman.net
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 1:13 AM
Subject: Re:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Patrick,
On Friday, September 13, 2013, Patrick Dung wrote:
What? That's absolutely *not* required for pg_upgrade to work. In
general, I would recommend that you make a copy of the database, but
it's certainly not
I recently upgraded from postgres 8.2.6 to 9.2.4 . For the most part I am
enjoying the upgrade. I have found one behavior that I can not explain.
Below is sample contents of a table. VALUE in column 7 is defined as
double precision (table definition is the same in 8.2.6 as 9.2.4).
The
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Dung
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 1:55 PM
To: Stephen Frost; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Cc: Ivan Voras; Tom Lane
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
3. But
On 09/13/2013 11:32 AM, NWRFC Portland wrote:
I recently upgraded from postgres 8.2.6 to 9.2.4 . For the most part I
am enjoying the upgrade. I have found one behavior that I can not
explain.
Below is sample contents of a table. VALUE in column 7 is defined as
double precision (table
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Frost
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 2:06 PM
To: Patrick Dung
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Ivan Voras; Tom Lane
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Major upgrade
Patrick,
* Patrick Dung (patrick_...@yahoo.com.hk) wrote:
I think the documentation could put a note at the beginning for new users.
Yes, probably true. Feel free to propose specific improvements.
2. Also I think the documentation should provide more info for users that use
packages.
Most
Arian,
It is a single database . Postgres was upgraded from 8.2.6 to 9.2.4... the
database contents was not altered in upgrade, that is a 8.2.6 dump was not
created then uploaded to 9.2.4.
Perhaps handling of double precision, changed from 8.2.6 to 9.2.4 ?
Joanne
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at
From: Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net
To: Patrick Dung patrick_...@yahoo.com.hk
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Ivan Voras
ivo...@freebsd.org; Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 2:05 AM
Subject:
On 09/13/2013 12:36 PM, Joanne Salerno - NOAA Federal wrote:
Arian,
It is a single database . Postgres was upgraded from 8.2.6 to 9.2.4...
the database contents was not altered in upgrade, that is a 8.2.6 dump
was not created then uploaded to 9.2.4.
So you used pg_upgrade to move the data?
From: Igor Neyman iney...@perceptron.com
To: Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net; Patrick Dung patrick_...@yahoo.com.hk
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Ivan Voras
ivo...@freebsd.org; Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Sent: Saturday,
Hello all,
I'm tackling host standby streaming replication for the first time, in
a small set-up with just two computers (one master, one standby) and an
extremely light load (at its busiest, one transaction every couple of
minutes). Both systems are running PG 9.1 on Debian Wheezy from
From: Patrick Dung [mailto:patrick_...@yahoo.com.hk]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 3:50 PM
To: Igor Neyman; Stephen Frost
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Ivan Voras; Tom Lane
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
For Windows, is it using symbolic links or hard
Looking at using LDAP to ease the pain of maintaining user accounts across
many tens of PostgreSQL servers ...
As documented, LDAP solves a few of the problems we have -- since everyone
will be in LDAP, we can use LDAP's password complexity rules and password
expiration to handle those security
* Bill Moran (wmo...@potentialtech.com) wrote:
As documented, LDAP solves a few of the problems we have -- since everyone
will be in LDAP, we can use LDAP's password complexity rules and password
expiration to handle those security requirements, and (of course) when
someone changes their
On 13 September 2013 21:44, Patrick Dung patrick_...@yahoo.com.hk wrote:
Ivan Voras has replied that the link method work fine in Windows on another
thread.
That would be very surprising since I don't run Windows servers :)
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
Running on my MacBook Pro, pgAdmin3 tells me I have four servers in Server
Groups,
all local, no network involved.
I have dumped two of my DBs from a current server using pg_dump.
Then in pgAdmin3 I created another server, let's call it New.
I would like to look at these earlier DBs while not
Hello David,
I replied to your original e-mail but it must have vanished into the
ether. I sent you a brief precis about transaction processing.
For SELECT FOR UPDATE to function, you MUST have an unique key on the
table. For example:-
crawlq_id SERIAL NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY USING INDEX
On 9/13/2013 2:03 PM, Bob Futrelle wrote:
Running on my MacBook Pro, pgAdmin3 tells me I have four servers in
Server Groups,
all local, no network involved.
I have dumped two of my DBs from a current server using pg_dump.
Then in pgAdmin3 I created another server, let's call it New.
I would
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:29:47 -0400 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Thus, when I go to log in as wmoran, LDAP checks my password, then informs
PostgreSQL to allow me in with specified roles, and I can do operations
granted to those roles.
That's a little over-simplistic, isn't
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
What's your client side stack?
merlin
Right now we are using something a little lighter weight in terms db
discovery but it doesn't handle this situation very well. I am the author
of the PGObject space on CPAN and
On 09/13/2013 12:36 PM, Joanne Salerno - NOAA Federal wrote:
Arian,
It is a single database . Postgres was upgraded from 8.2.6 to 9.2.4...
the database contents was not altered in upgrade, that is a 8.2.6 dump
was not created then uploaded to 9.2.4.
Perhaps handling of double precision,
On Sep 13, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
[1] and one of the wiki
articles [2] seem to indicate that you need to set up log-shipping as
well as SR, whereas one of the wiki articles [2] indicates that
log-shipping isn't required. I've followed [3] and it seems to work fine
in
T
he log shipping is useful when SR slave can not catch up the master and
hungry enough to cause replication stop work.For example,when you want to
stop the slave for a long time or do a large copy from,the
wal_keep_segments on master reached，SR slave may not catch up the master.If
log shipping is
49 matches
Mail list logo
