On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Erik van Zijst
erik.van.zi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
In your case user% is dominating system load. Along with the high cs
this is really suggesting spinlock contention. A 'perf top' is
How can I get first day date of the previous month. Last day of previous month
can be found using the answer - http://stackoverflow.com/a/8945281/2767755
Regards,
Arup Rakshit
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Arup Rakshit
arupraks...@rocketmail.com wrote:
How can I get first day date of the previous month. Last day of previous
month can be found using the answer -
http://stackoverflow.com/a/8945281/2767755
Here is how to get the first day date of the previous month:
Thanks for your answer. How to get the first day date of last 6 months from now
then will be :
yelloday_development=# select date_trunc('month', now()) - interval '5 month'
as first_month;
first_month
---
2014-01-01 00:00:00+05:30
(1 row)
Is it correct
Hi list,
We have been using Postgresql for more than a decade now. Never had any real
problems. Thank you very much for this great product.
Now recently I have noticed a strange problem.
Below is a traceback of a python program using psycopg and this correlates with
the postgresql log below
On 20 June 2014 09:11, Arup Rakshit arupraks...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your answer. How to get the first day date of last 6 months from
now then will be :
yelloday_development=# select date_trunc('month', now()) - interval '5
month' as first_month;
first_month
Now you can edit the dump and attempt to restore it until it succeeds
on a different system, after which you know for certain that your data
matches at least your integrity constraints.
That makes sense to me, thanks Is there is an easier or better way
to edit the binary dump file? Like
Have not faced any issues with the rhel6 RPMs. Thanks for your time help.
Regards
Bhushan Pathak
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Bhushan Pathak bhushan.patha...@gmail.com
wrote:
I will try the the RPMs from the rhel 6 link post updates.
Thanks
Bhushan Pathak
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at
Hello,
I'm new in postgresql, I'm sorry if I do something bad.
Default value or shared_buffers is 128MB, I have a dedicated server for
postgresql with 8GB RAM. I've changed shared_buffers value to 2048MB and
uncommented the entry in postgresql.conf. It shows now:
# - Memory -
shared_buffers =
Hi,
Can you please check the output of below command:
postgres=# show shared_buffers ;
Thanks Regards,
Abdul Sayeed
System Engineer
The Postgres Database Company
Are you updated: Latest version of Postgres Plus Advanced Server are
8.4.19.42, 9.0.16.34, 9.1.12.20, 9.2.8.19 and 9.3.4.10
To
Thank you very much to all.
postgres=# show shared_buffers;
shared_buffers
2GB
(1 row)
Is it ok then, isn't it? DB hasn't activity now because it is a new
instance, top command indicates only 350MB of used memory .. I understand
that postgresql could reach until 2GB of server
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Erik van Zijst
erik.van.zi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Erik van Zijst
erik.van.zi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
In your case user% is dominating system load. Along with
Hi,
It shows 2GB. It means it is updated. Shared_buffer memory is used at
postgresql database level, It will consume while doing operation such as
INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE and other maintenance task (VACUUM/VACUUM FULL).
Thanks,
Abdul
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Oliver ofab...@gmail.com
Oliver ofab...@gmail.com wrote:
DB hasn't activity now because it is a new instance, top command
indicates only 350MB of used memory .. I understand that
postgresql could reach until 2GB of server memory as total,
correct?
It's usually much better to copy/paste what you're talking about
than
On 06/20/2014 01:18 AM, Dick Kniep wrote:
Hi list,
We have been using Postgresql for more than a decade now. Never had any real
problems. Thank you very much for this great product.
Now recently I have noticed a strange problem.
Below is a traceback of a python program using psycopg and this
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Larry J Prikockis lprikoc...@vecna.com wrote:
so from the much-loved
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server page, we have
this:
PostgreSQL can only safely use a write cache if it has a battery backup. See
WAL reliability for an
On 06/20/2014 09:41 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Larry J Prikockis lprikoc...@vecna.com wrote:
so from the much-loved
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server page, we have
this:
PostgreSQL can only safely use a write cache if it has a
Erik van Zijst erik.van.zi...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
In your case user% is dominating system load. Along with the high cs
this is really suggesting spinlock contention. A 'perf top' is
essential for identifying the culprit.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Larry Prikockis lprikoc...@vecna.com wrote:
On 06/20/2014 09:41 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Larry J Prikockis lprikoc...@vecna.com
wrote:
so from the much-loved
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Borislav Ivanov biva...@atlassian.com wrote:
If your database is relatively small, I would recommend
http://www.pgbarman.org/. It does binary backup and will take care of your
WAL files. The laster version of pgbarman can also take backups from a slave
using
Larry Prikockis wrote:
ok... so maybe a better question would be: other than cases of power
failure or something else that caused the server to shut down
unexpectedly and uncleanly, what is the actual risk of data loss? In
my case, the possibility of losing a recent transaction or two in
the
On 06/20/2014 12:11 AM, Arup Rakshit wrote:
Thanks for your answer. How to get the first day date of last 6 months
from now then will be :
yelloday_development=# select date_trunc('month', now()) - interval '5
month' as first_month;
first_month
---
2014-01-01
On 06/20/2014 01:18 AM, Dick Kniep wrote:
Hi list,
...
Now recently I have noticed a strange problem.
...
psycopg2.DatabaseError: SSL error: ccs received early
Did you try Googling SSL error: ccs received early? Like Adrian, I
suspect your answer will be found in one of those messages. What
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Oliver ofab...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm new in postgresql, I'm sorry if I do something bad.
Default value or shared_buffers is 128MB, I have a dedicated server for
postgresql with 8GB RAM. I've changed shared_buffers value to 2048MB and
uncommented the
how can i install pgAgent in postgresql 8.4 if mi internet conection don't
allow to any program to conect internet.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/pgAgent-tp5808135.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
I think it depends on how you are going to use them. I, for example, have
lots of images that are served on a web page, after benchmarks I found it was
faster to store them on filesystem and let apache serve them directly.
I rarely store
On 21/06/14 03:12, Steve Crawford wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:11 AM, Arup Rakshit wrote:
Thanks for your answer. How to get the first day date of last 6
months from now then will be :
yelloday_development=# select date_trunc('month', now()) - interval
'5 month' as first_month;
first_month
On Friday, June 20, 2014 08:12:14 AM you wrote:
Welcome. And yes, it is awesome.
I agree.
Being new to the DB
No. I worked on Oracle DB earlier days(approx 2 years). But pgsql just 1
month.
and mailing list,
please note that the convention on all PostgreSQL mailing lists is to
post your
28 matches
Mail list logo
