Hi, there.
Firstly, as this is my first post on a PgSQL ML, I hope this ML is the
good one for my question.
I'm trying to secure further some PgSQL servers and am reading
documentation about libpq sslmode option. I have a question about that:
as I understand the internals of this option, the
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:29 PM, David Guyot
david.gu...@europecamions-interactive.com wrote:
Hi, there.
Firstly, as this is my first post on a PgSQL ML, I hope this ML is the
good one for my question.
I'm trying to secure further some PgSQL servers and am reading
documentation about
Ah! So there was my error! Should be good to explain this in the
official libpq documentation, don't you think? If I correctly read, the
connection string as source of the hostname isn't explicit, there is
only the mention that libpq will check that the responding server is
“the one I specify”.
DISTINCT ON is my favorite lesser-known Postgres feature.
You said it ! There I was, trying and failing to make DISTINCT work
for me, little did I know that the little word ON was missing from my
Postgresql vocabulary !
Thanks !
On 27 January 2015 at 02:24, Maciek Sakrejda mac...@heroku.com
Thanks for the extra feedback Merlin. I'll look into it a bit more,
JSONB obviously needs a bit of experimentation in the lab to get my
query syntax right !
On 27 January 2015 at 00:13, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Tim Smith
Hi,
maybe this will help:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION _final_nth( anyarray, integer ) RETURNS
anyelement AS $BODY$ SELECT a FROM unnest( $1 ) a ORDER BY a offset $2
LIMIT 1; $BODY$
USE it without an extra aggregate-function.
SELECT _final_nth(array_agg(someelement),n) AS someelement FROM
Sorry to ask again, but I still have not got any reply to this. Maybe this
indicates it’s a bad option?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Jeremy Palmer
jpal...@linz.govt.nzmailto:jpal...@linz.govt.nz wrote:
Hi All,
I'm just investigating the option for configuring SSO for windows clients
Oliver Dizon johnoli...@rtzassociates.com writes:
Hi Guys,
I hope I'm in the right place to throw this. I just want to ask the reason
behind this weird scenario.
All records were deleted in a table even if the subquery in the where clause
has a missing a column.
--from a certain script
Oliver Dizon schrieb am 27.01.2015 um 11:46:
I hope I'm in the right place to throw this. I just want to ask the reason
behind this weird scenario.
All records were deleted in a table even if the subquery in the where clause
has a missing a column.
--from a certain script where table_id
Oliver Dizon johnoli...@rtzassociates.com writes:
Hi Guys,
I hope I'm in the right place to throw this. I just want to ask the reason
behind this weird scenario.
All records were deleted in a table even if the subquery in the where clause
has a missing a column.
--from a certain script
Thanks for the tips. I'll make some adjustments
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Sameer Kumar sameer.ku...@ashnik.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Tim Uckun timuc...@gmail.com wrote:
The query seems to first use the timestamp column which results in a huge
number of records and
Hi Guys,
I hope I'm in the right place to throw this. I just want to ask the reason
behind this weird scenario.
All records were deleted in a table even if the subquery in the where clause
has a missing a column.
--from a certain script where table_id is not yet existing on table_sample
Hi list,
the system HDD of a server running postgresql 9.3 died (sudden
electronical death) during a pg_dump. The database is located on a
hardware raid system (another HDD). I installed a new ubuntu 14.04 with
postgresql 9.3 postgis 2.1. But i cannot start the server. First i got
the error:
Oliver Dizon schrieb am 27.01.2015 um 11:46:
I hope I'm in the right place to throw this. I just want to ask the reason
behind this weird scenario.
All records were deleted in a table even if the subquery in the where clause
has a missing a column.
--from a certain script where table_id
Oliver Dizon wrote:
I hope I'm in the right place to throw this. I just want to ask the reason
behind this weird scenario.
All records were deleted in a table even if the subquery in the where clause
has a missing a column.
--from a certain script where table_id is not yet existing on
Hi:
I am wanting to define some functions as described in section 35.9 of
the manual, C-Language Functions. I am compiling pre-existing files
of c-code from another project into object files, and then linking
those object files into a shared library along with my own functions
that follow the
16 matches
Mail list logo