Re: [GENERAL] plugin dev, oid to pointer map

2016-05-29 Thread Julien Rouhaud
On 29/05/2016 22:10, Attila Soki wrote: > Hi all, > Hello, > i am about to begin with postgresql plugin development. >H Currently i'm trying to become somewhat familiar with the postgresql sources. > > Without going too deep into details about the plugin, i want to use > many Oid to pointer re

[GENERAL] plugin dev, oid to pointer map

2016-05-29 Thread Attila Soki
Hi all, i am about to begin with postgresql plugin development. Currently i'm trying to become somewhat familiar with the postgresql sources. Without going too deep into details about the plugin, i want to use many Oid to pointer relations. The pointer is a pointer to my own struct (allocated wit

Re: [GENERAL] Slides for PGCon2016; "FTS is dead ? Long live FTS !"

2016-05-29 Thread Karsten Hilbert
>> I submitted slides to pgcon site, but it usually takes awhile, so you can >> download our presentation directly >> http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/talks/pgcon-2016-fts.pdf Looking at slide 39 (attached) I get the impression that I should be able to do the following: - turn a coding sys

Re: [GENERAL] BDR to ignore table exists error

2016-05-29 Thread Martín Marqués
Hi, El 29/05/16 a las 06:01, Nikhil escribió: > > *​Nik>> skip_ddl_locking is set to True in my configuration. As this > was preventing single* > > *​node from doing DDL operation (if one is down majority is not there > for doing DDL on available node)*​ Well, you have to be prepared to

Re: [GENERAL] Slides for PGCon2016; "FTS is dead ? Long live FTS !"

2016-05-29 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Stefan Keller wrote: > Hi, > > Nice work from you postgrespro.ru guys! Especially the RUM index which > demonstrates the power of 9.6 to let third party SW create access methods > as extension: https://github.com/postgrespro/rum > > 1. I don't understand the bench

Re: [GENERAL] Slides for PGCon2016; "FTS is dead ? Long live FTS !"

2016-05-29 Thread Andreas Joseph Krogh
På søndag 29. mai 2016 kl. 19:49:06, skrev Oleg Bartunov mailto:obartu...@gmail.com>>: [snip]   I want to run 9.6 beta in production right now because of this:-)   wait-wait :)  We'd be happy to have feedback from production, of course, but please, wait a bit. We are adding support of sorting post

Re: [GENERAL] Slides for PGCon2016; "FTS is dead ? Long live FTS !"

2016-05-29 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > På lørdag 28. mai 2016 kl. 23:59:55, skrev Oleg Bartunov < > obartu...@gmail.com>: > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh > wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> Any news about when slides for $subject will be available? >>

Re: [GENERAL] Slides for PGCon2016; "FTS is dead ? Long live FTS !"

2016-05-29 Thread Stefan Keller
Hi, Nice work from you postgrespro.ru guys! Especially the RUM index which demonstrates the power of 9.6 to let third party SW create access methods as extension: https://github.com/postgrespro/rum 1. I don't understand the benchmarks on slide 25 "20 mln descriptions" (and the one before "6.7 mln

Re: [GENERAL] Slides for PGCon2016; "FTS is dead ? Long live FTS !"

2016-05-29 Thread Andreas Joseph Krogh
På lørdag 28. mai 2016 kl. 23:59:55, skrev Oleg Bartunov mailto:obartu...@gmail.com>>:     On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh mailto:andr...@visena.com>> wrote: Hi.   Any news about when slides for $subject will be available?   I submitted slides to pgcon site, but it usually ta

Re: [GENERAL] Migrate 2 DB's - v8.3

2016-05-29 Thread Francisco Olarte
Martin: Could you please avoid unedited top posts? On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Martín Marqués wrote: > I still don't understand why the OP is getting into so much trouble and > doesn't upgrade to a newer version like 9.3 or 9.4 (or even 9.5). Neither do I, but the thing is trying to find t

Re: [GENERAL] BDR to ignore table exists error

2016-05-29 Thread Nikhil
Please see my replies inline. On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Martín Marqués wrote: > El 28/05/16 a las 08:57, Nikhil escribió: > > Once the node which was down is brought back the replication slot is not > > turned active. The reason being replication slot is trying to create a > > partition t