On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Philippe BEAUDOIN wrote:
> I am currently playing with extensions. And I found a strange behaviour
> change with 9.6beta2 and 3 when pg_dumping a database with an extension
> having sequences. This looks like a bug, ... unless I did something
On 7/22/16 7:31 AM, Charles Clavadetscher wrote:
I need to pass an array as a parameter in a function, but it is a part of a trigger that
get a "new" value.
>
> I've tested it like
>
> select function_x(1,55,array[['x'],['y']])
> or
> select
On 7/22/2016 5:50 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
If I where to hazard a guess it would have to do with pgloader
migrating from being written in Python to being written in Common
Lisp, that occurred at roughly the same time.
ah, yer right, the one in the pg 9.2 repo is 2.3.x, and indeed, pgloader
On 07/22/2016 05:24 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
this question is mostly for devrim, who maintains the RHEL/CentOS/Fedora
PGDG yum repositories...
I note that pgloader is in the yum repo for Postgresql 9.2 on Centos 6,
but not 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, wondering if there's a reason it was dropped?
If I
this question is mostly for devrim, who maintains the RHEL/CentOS/Fedora
PGDG yum repositories...
I note that pgloader is in the yum repo for Postgresql 9.2 on Centos 6,
but not 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, wondering if there's a reason it was dropped?
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
Hi,
I recently test YCSB benchmark too.
But contrary to my expectation, PG (9.5) is slower than MongoDB 3.2.
Paul said that making table with no logging option improved the performance,
and it might be equal to MongoDB's behavior.
But in MongoDB documentation, it writes journal log too.
So I think
Hi,
I recently test YCSB benchmark too.
But contrary to my expectation, PG (9.5) is slower than MongoDB 3.2.
Paul said that making table with no logging option improved the performance,
and it might be equal to MongoDB's behavior.
But in MongoDB documentation, it writes journal log too.
So I think
Hi,
I recently test YCSB benchmark too.
But contrary to my expectation, PG (9.5) is slower than MongoDB 3.2.
Paul said that making table with no logging option improved the performance,
and it might be equal to MongoDB's behavior.
But in MongoDB documentation, it writes journal log too.
So I think
On 7/20/16 1:14 PM, Mark Lybarger wrote:
This leads me to think I need to create 2^5 or 32 unique constraints to
handle the various combinations of data that I can store.
Another option would be to create a unique index of a bit varying field
that set a bit to true for each field that was
Hi,
I recently test YCSB benchmark too.
But contrary to my expectation, PG (9.5) is slower than MongoDB 3.2.
Paul said that making table with no logging option improved the performance,
and it might be equal to MongoDB's behavior.
But in MongoDB documentation, it writes journal log too.
So I think
Hi all,
I am currently playing with extensions. And I found a strange behaviour
change with 9.6beta2 and 3 when pg_dumping a database with an extension
having sequences. This looks like a bug, ... unless I did something wrong.
Here is a test case (a simple linux shell script, that can be
Hi,
I recently test YCSB benchmark too.
But contrary to my expectation, PG (9.5) is slower than MongoDB 3.2.
Paul said that making table with no logging option improved the performance,
and it might be equal to MongoDB's behavior.
But in MongoDB documentation, it writes journal log too.
So I think
Hello
> From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Aislan Luiz Wendling
> Sent: Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2016 19:17
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: [GENERAL] Array value from table as parameter
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to pass an array
Ok, thanks !
Alex Ignatov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
On 22.07.2016 06:49, Sameer Kumar wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:14 PM Alex Ignatov > wrote:
And what is the options
> From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of zubair alam
> Sent: Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2016 09:09
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: [GENERAL] For storing XML version in our table.
Hi
How i can store my xml data with their
15 matches
Mail list logo