Re: [GENERAL] Re: Causeless CPU load waves in backend, on windows, 9.5.5 (EDB binary).

2017-02-13 Thread Nikolai Zhubr
14.02.2017 1:10, Thomas Kellerer: Nikolai Zhubr schrieb am 13.02.2017 um 23:03: Maybe I should have been more specific. What I need is debugging/profiling pure communication side of server operation, implying huge lots of requests and replies going over the wire to and from the server within som

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/13/2017 02:10 PM, mpomykacz wrote: Yes, I'm talking about pgAdmin III - sorry... I think that auto-commit is on on default but auto-rollback is off. But I'll check if you say so. Did you look here: https://www.pgadmin.org/docs/1.22/options-query_tool.html It seems checking it here woul

[GENERAL] Write from Postgres to SQL Server

2017-02-13 Thread Guyren Howe
I find myself in an environment wanting to move to Postgres, having a variety of smaller Postgres databases, but the business currently revolves around a “God” SQL Server database. I’m looking for general advice about making the two work together. More specifically, interoperating between the t

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL corruption

2017-02-13 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:21 PM, James Sewell > wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> I am working with a client who is facing issues with database corruption >> after a physical hard power off (the machines are at remote sites, this >> could be

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL corruption

2017-02-13 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:21 PM, James Sewell wrote: > > Hello All, > > I am working with a client who is facing issues with database corruption > after a physical hard power off (the machines are at remote sites, this could > be a power outage or user error). > > They have an environment made u

[GENERAL] PostgreSQL corruption

2017-02-13 Thread James Sewell
Hello All, I am working with a client who is facing issues with database corruption after a physical hard power off (the machines are at remote sites, this could be a power outage or user error). They have an environment made up of many of the following consumer grade stand alone machines: -

Re: [GENERAL] xmlelement AND timestamps.

2017-02-13 Thread David G. Johnston
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:10 PM, David G. Johnston < david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > XML itself is textual and we don't have any internal support for DTD or > Schema as it is so I'm not sure what material benefit we gain by > restraining ourselves here. > ​This apparently isn't true - the XM

Re: [GENERAL] xmlelement AND timestamps.

2017-02-13 Thread Tom Lane
Lynn Dobbs writes: > I just migrated from 9.2.4 to 9.6.1 and had several user created > functions fail. > Recreating the failure with "SELECT xmlelement(name foo, > 'infinity'::timestamp) > ERROR: timestamp out of range > DETAIL: XML does not support infinite timestamp values. > I don't find a

Re: [GENERAL] Causeless CPU load waves in backend, on windows, 9.5.5 (EDB binary).

2017-02-13 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Nikolai Zhubr wrote: > 13.02.2017 23:58, Rader, David: >> >> How about using pg_isready? >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pg-isready.html > > But it doesn't actually communicate with the server AFAIK, just checks if a > connection could be esta

Re: [GENERAL] xmlelement AND timestamps.

2017-02-13 Thread David G. Johnston
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 02/13/2017 02:56 PM, Lynn Dobbs wrote: > >> I just migrated from 9.2.4 to 9.6.1 and had several user created >> functions fail. >> >> Recreating the failure with "SELECT xmlelement(name foo, >> 'infinity'::timestamp) >> ERROR: timestamp o

Re: [GENERAL] xmlelement AND timestamps.

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/13/2017 02:56 PM, Lynn Dobbs wrote: I just migrated from 9.2.4 to 9.6.1 and had several user created functions fail. Recreating the failure with "SELECT xmlelement(name foo, 'infinity'::timestamp) ERROR: timestamp out of range DETAIL: XML does not support infinite timestamp values. I don'

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread mpomykacz
Yes, I'm talking about pgAdmin III - sorry... I think that auto-commit is on on default but auto-rollback is off. But I'll check if you say so. And I know I can check the box next to Enable Auto ROLLBACK but I'm trying to avoid it and enable auto rollback not by a manual way. -- View this mess

Re: [GENERAL] Re: Causeless CPU load waves in backend, on windows, 9.5.5 (EDB binary).

2017-02-13 Thread Scott Mead
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote: > Nikolai Zhubr schrieb am 13.02.2017 um 23:03: > >> Maybe I should have been more specific. >> What I need is debugging/profiling pure communication side of server >> operation, implying huge lots of requests and replies going over the >> w

[GENERAL] xmlelement AND timestamps.

2017-02-13 Thread Lynn Dobbs
I just migrated from 9.2.4 to 9.6.1 and had several user created functions fail. Recreating the failure with "SELECT xmlelement(name foo, 'infinity'::timestamp) ERROR: timestamp out of range DETAIL: XML does not support infinite timestamp values. I don't find anything in the documentation tha

Re: [GENERAL] Bad planning data resulting in OOM killing of postgres

2017-02-13 Thread David Hinkle
I manually updated the pg_statistics data by literally set it to an appropriate amount, and the planner picked a new plan and the new plan worked. Any idea what I should do about this? Is manually updating these values my best bet? psql:daemon@cipafilter = update pg_statistic set stadistinct = 8

[GENERAL] Documentation inconsistency (at least to me)

2017-02-13 Thread Thomas Kellerer
I wonder why regexp_split_to_array() is listed under "String functions and operators" [1] but string_to_array() is listed under "Array functions and operators" [2] I find that a bit inconsistent - I would expect to find both in the same chapter. I would suggest to put both into "String functio

[GENERAL] Re: Causeless CPU load waves in backend, on windows, 9.5.5 (EDB binary).

2017-02-13 Thread Thomas Kellerer
Nikolai Zhubr schrieb am 13.02.2017 um 23:03: Maybe I should have been more specific. What I need is debugging/profiling pure communication side of server operation, implying huge lots of requests and replies going over the wire to and from the server within some continued (valid) session, but so

Re: [GENERAL] Potential bug with pg_notify

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/13/2017 11:50 AM, François Beaulieu wrote: > >> On Feb 13, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> >> On 02/13/2017 09:04 AM, François Beaulieu wrote: >>> On Feb 13, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: >>

Re: [GENERAL] Bad planning data resulting in OOM killing of postgres

2017-02-13 Thread David Hinkle
I managed to get this version to finish: psql:postgres@cipafilter = explain (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) select count(*) from (select titleid from log_raw group by titleid) as a; QUERY PLAN ───

Re: [GENERAL] Causeless CPU load waves in backend, on windows, 9.5.5 (EDB binary).

2017-02-13 Thread Nikolai Zhubr
13.02.2017 23:58, Rader, David: How about using pg_isready? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pg-isready.html But it doesn't actually communicate with the server AFAIK, just checks if a connection could be established? Maybe I should have been more specific. What I need is d

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres

2017-02-13 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/10/2017 10:48 PM, prakash ramakrishnan wrote: Am Prakash from Chennai and am working in postgres edb 9.5 I need your help for pgpool and pgbouncer configuration steps and please keep in touch if I get any error. I can't imagine any scenario where you'd use pgpool and pgbouncer tog

Re: [GENERAL] Bad planning data resulting in OOM killing of postgres

2017-02-13 Thread David Hinkle
psql:postgres@cipafilter = EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) select titleid from titles WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM log_raw WHERE log_raw.titleid = titles.titleid ); server closed the connection unexpectedly This probably means the server terminated abnormally before or while processi

Re: [GENERAL] Bad planning data resulting in OOM killing of postgres

2017-02-13 Thread Jeff Janes
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:43 PM, David Hinkle wrote: > Thanks Jeff, > > No triggers or foreign key constrains: > > psql:postgres@cipafilter = \d+ titles > Table "public.titles" > Column │ Type│Modifiers

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres

2017-02-13 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:48 AM, prakash ramakrishnan wrote: > Hi, > >Am Prakash from Chennai and am working in postgres edb 9.5 I need > your help for pgpool and pgbouncer configuration steps and please keep in > touch if I get any error. why don't you ask some specific questions? merl

Re: [GENERAL] Causeless CPU load waves in backend, on windows, 9.5.5 (EDB binary).

2017-02-13 Thread Rader, David
How about using pg_isready? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pg-isready.html -- David Rader dav...@openscg.com On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Nikolai Zhubr wrote: > Hello all, > > In order to locate the problem more precisely, I'd like to prepare a test, > involving some p

Re: [GENERAL] Bad planning data resulting in OOM killing of postgres

2017-02-13 Thread David Hinkle
Thanks Jeff, No triggers or foreign key constrains: psql:postgres@cipafilter = \d+ titles Table "public.titles" Column │ Type│Modifiers │ Storage │ Stats target │ Description ─┼─

Re: [GENERAL] Bad planning data resulting in OOM killing of postgres

2017-02-13 Thread Jeff Janes
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:53 AM, David Hinkle wrote: > Thanks guys, here's the information you requested: > > psql:postgres@cipafilter = show work_mem; > work_mem > ── > 10MB > (1 row) > OK, new theory then. Do you have triggers on or foreign key constraints to the table you are del

Re: [GENERAL] Bad planning data resulting in OOM killing of postgres

2017-02-13 Thread David Hinkle
Thanks guys, here's the information you requested: psql:postgres@cipafilter = show work_mem; work_mem ── 10MB (1 row) psql:postgres@cipafilter = select version(); version

Re: [GENERAL] Potential bug with pg_notify

2017-02-13 Thread François Beaulieu
> On Feb 13, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > > On 02/13/2017 09:04 AM, François Beaulieu wrote: >> >>> On Feb 13, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Adrian Klaver >>> wrote: >>> > | > 3) Are the first row and the second r

Re: [GENERAL] Bad planning data resulting in OOM killing of postgres

2017-02-13 Thread Jeff Janes
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Hinkle wrote: > I'm having trouble with purges related to a large table. The delete > query consumes ram until postgres crashes due to OOM. I have a very > large table called log_raw. There are half a dozen related tables, > such as 'urls' and 'titles'.

Re: [GENERAL] Potential bug with pg_notify

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/13/2017 09:04 AM, François Beaulieu wrote: On Feb 13, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: | 3) Are the first row and the second row in the same partition? Doubtful, the problem occurs several times a day and

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread Melvin Davidson
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Moreno Andreo wrote: > Il 13/02/2017 18:59, John R Pierce ha scritto: > >> option? query editor window? what software are you talking about? >> >> I'm using 1.22.1 version. >>> >> >> 1.22.1 version? PostgreSQL versions currently supported are 9.2.x to >>

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread Moreno Andreo
Il 13/02/2017 18:59, John R Pierce ha scritto: option? query editor window? what software are you talking about? I'm using 1.22.1 version. 1.22.1 version? PostgreSQL versions currently supported are 9.2.x to 9.6.x I think he's talking about pgAdmin III Cheers Moreno -- Se

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/13/2017 09:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/13/2017 7:15 AM, mpomykacz wrote: >> So my problem is like this: >> >> I start the transaction with BEGIN TRANSACTION; >> Then I have for example some INSERTs to DB >> and at the end COMMIT; and END TRANSACTION; > > COMMIT ends the transaction.

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread Melvin Davidson
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 02/13/2017 09:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 2/13/2017 7:15 AM, mpomykacz wrote: >> >>> So my problem is like this: >>> >>> I start the transaction with BEGIN TRANSACTION; >>> Then I have for example some INSERTs to DB >>> and at the

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/13/2017 09:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 2/13/2017 7:15 AM, mpomykacz wrote: So my problem is like this: I start the transaction with BEGIN TRANSACTION; Then I have for example some INSERTs to DB and at the end COMMIT; and END TRANSACTION; COMMIT ends the transaction. In PostgreSQL,

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/13/2017 7:15 AM, mpomykacz wrote: So my problem is like this: I start the transaction with BEGIN TRANSACTION; Then I have for example some INSERTs to DB and at the end COMMIT; and END TRANSACTION; COMMIT ends the transaction. In PostgreSQL, END TRANSACTION is redundant, equivalent to C

Re: [GENERAL] Bad planning data resulting in OOM killing of postgres

2017-02-13 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hi 2017-02-13 18:40 GMT+01:00 David Hinkle : > I'm having trouble with purges related to a large table. The delete > query consumes ram until postgres crashes due to OOM. I have a very > large table called log_raw. There are half a dozen related tables, > such as 'urls' and 'titles'. log_r

[GENERAL] Bad planning data resulting in OOM killing of postgres

2017-02-13 Thread David Hinkle
I'm having trouble with purges related to a large table. The delete query consumes ram until postgres crashes due to OOM. I have a very large table called log_raw. There are half a dozen related tables, such as 'urls' and 'titles'. log_raw.urlid = urls.urlid and urls contains the text of the

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread mpomykacz
So my problem is like this: I start the transaction with BEGIN TRANSACTION; Then I have for example some INSERTs to DB and at the end COMMIT; and END TRANSACTION; But if one of this INSERTs causes error, the transaction will stop (but it is still open and next patch is implemented within the same

Re: [GENERAL] Potential bug with pg_notify

2017-02-13 Thread François Beaulieu
> On Feb 13, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > > On 02/13/2017 07:59 AM, François Beaulieu wrote: >> >>> On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Adrian Klaver >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 02/10/2017 02:54 PM, François Beaulieu wrote: Hi all, I’m trying to feed a worker process o

Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public

2017-02-13 Thread Stephen Frost
Frank, * Frank van Vugt (ftm.van.v...@foxi.nl) wrote: > Well, I didn't run into this issue with any of my db's that 'nicely' use > tables in various schema's, it was actually the one 'older' db with > everything > in the public schema that brought it up, so maybe keeping one of those around >

Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public

2017-02-13 Thread Frank van Vugt
Hi Stephen, Op maandag 13 februari 2017 09:10:42 schreef Stephen Frost: > We should be able to get it addressed shortly. Great, 'as always', I'd like to add! Thanks for the great work, people. This cannot be stated too often... > For your specific case Thanks for the additional info, interesti

Re: [GENERAL] Potential bug with pg_notify

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/13/2017 07:59 AM, François Beaulieu wrote: On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 02/10/2017 02:54 PM, François Beaulieu wrote: Hi all, I’m trying to feed a worker process on another server using pg_notify in a trigger. I’m running pgsql 9.4 and hitting some behaviour

Re: [GENERAL] Recorded PostgreSQL at 10TB and Beyond

2017-02-13 Thread Vincent Veyron
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:52:05 + Seref Arikan wrote: > Many thanks for this. > +1 -- Bien à vous, Vincent Veyron https://libremen.com Logiciels de gestion, libres -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make chang

Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/13/2017 07:52 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: Greetings, * Adrian Klaver (adrian.kla...@aklaver.com) wrote: On 02/13/2017 06:04 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: * Adrian Klaver (adrian.kla...@aklaver.com) wrote: I am following this up to the point of not understanding what exactly changed between 9.5

Re: [GENERAL] Potential bug with pg_notify

2017-02-13 Thread François Beaulieu
> On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > > On 02/10/2017 02:54 PM, François Beaulieu wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I’m trying to feed a worker process on another server using pg_notify in a >> trigger. I’m running pgsql 9.4 and hitting some behaviour that I’m hoping is >> just a b

Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public

2017-02-13 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * Adrian Klaver (adrian.kla...@aklaver.com) wrote: > On 02/13/2017 06:04 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > >* Adrian Klaver (adrian.kla...@aklaver.com) wrote: > >>I am following this up to the point of not understanding what > >>exactly changed between 9.5 and 9.6. Namely 9.5 does include the

Re: [GENERAL] Potential bug with pg_notify

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/10/2017 02:54 PM, François Beaulieu wrote: Hi all, I’m trying to feed a worker process on another server using pg_notify in a trigger. I’m running pgsql 9.4 and hitting some behaviour that I’m hoping is just a bug that can be solved with an upgrade, but I’m not finding any references t

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread Achilleas Mantzios
Take a look at ON_ERROR_STOP variable. \set ON_ERROR_STOP 1 On 13/02/2017 15:55, Małgorzata Hubert wrote: Hi, is there any way to set Auto-Rollback : ON, automaticly during instalation process or using query (maybe something like set autocommit = 'on')? We need it to automaticly close the tran

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/13/2017 05:55 AM, Małgorzata Hubert wrote: Hi, is there any way to set Auto-Rollback : ON, automaticly during instalation process or using query (maybe something like set autocommit = 'on')? We need it to automaticly close the transaction if an error occures during implementing patches. H

Re: [GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 02:55:03PM +0100, Małgorzata Hubert wrote: > is there any way to set Auto-Rollback : ON, automaticly during instalation > process or using query (maybe something like set autocommit = 'on')? > We need it to automaticly close the transaction if an error occures during > impl

Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public

2017-02-13 Thread Adrian Klaver
On 02/13/2017 06:04 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: Adrian, * Adrian Klaver (adrian.kla...@aklaver.com) wrote: I am following this up to the point of not understanding what exactly changed between 9.5 and 9.6. Namely 9.5 does include the default ACL's in the dump output and 9.6 does not. Quite a bit

[GENERAL] Auto-Rollback option

2017-02-13 Thread Małgorzata Hubert
Hi, is there any way to set Auto-Rollback : ON, automaticly during instalation process or using query (maybe something like set autocommit = 'on')? We need it to automaticly close the transaction if an error occures during implementing patches. Thanks in advanced for the answear. Best regards, Mal

Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public

2017-02-13 Thread Stephen Frost
Frank, * Frank van Vugt (ftm.van.v...@foxi.nl) wrote: > Op zaterdag 11 februari 2017 15:28:55 schreef Tom Lane: > > I'm inclined to argue that it was a mistake to include any non-pinned > > objects in pg_init_privs. > > > We might need to fix pg_dump too, but I think these entries in > > pg_init_

Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public

2017-02-13 Thread Stephen Frost
Adrian, * Adrian Klaver (adrian.kla...@aklaver.com) wrote: > I am following this up to the point of not understanding what > exactly changed between 9.5 and 9.6. Namely 9.5 does include the > default ACL's in the dump output and 9.6 does not. Quite a bit in pg_dump changed, but the relevant bit h

Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public

2017-02-13 Thread Stephen Frost
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost writes: > > I'm not seeing a very simple answer for this, unfortunately. > > I'm inclined to argue that it was a mistake to include any non-pinned > objects in pg_init_privs. The reason initdb leaves some objects unpinned > is exactly becaus

[GENERAL] Postgres

2017-02-13 Thread prakash ramakrishnan
Hi, Am Prakash from Chennai and am working in postgres edb 9.5 I need your help for pgpool and pgbouncer configuration steps and please keep in touch if I get any error. Thanks Prakash.r 9551559623

[GENERAL] Potential bug with pg_notify

2017-02-13 Thread François Beaulieu
Hi all, I’m trying to feed a worker process on another server using pg_notify in a trigger. I’m running pgsql 9.4 and hitting some behaviour that I’m hoping is just a bug that can be solved with an upgrade, but I’m not finding any references to it being a known bug and the uptime on my databas

Re: [GENERAL] Fwd: Query parameter types not recognized

2017-02-13 Thread Roberto Balarezo
Hmmm... I didn't know PostgreSQL had a facility for query logging and debugging of parameters to a logfile. Thought I had to execute a describe or something like that. Thanks, I'll try it to see what's happening! 2017-02-10 16:57 GMT-05:00 Adrian Klaver : > On 02/10/2017 01:51 PM, Roberto Balarez

Re: [GENERAL] Fwd: Query parameter types not recognized

2017-02-13 Thread Roberto Balarezo
Hi Rob, Thanks for your answer. The query is just an example I made to illustrate the problem. In the database I'm working with, duedate is a timestamp without timezone column, which can contain null values. The parameter is supposed to be of type DATE. From Java, I'm sending a Date object (which

Re: [GENERAL] Fwd: Query parameter types not recognized

2017-02-13 Thread Roberto Balarezo
Hi, The parameter defaultDueDate is a java.sql.Date object, an actual Date. When I run the query with the value in it, it works: ```sql db=> select COALESCE(duedate, date '2017-02-01' + 1) from invoices order by duedate desc; coalesce - 2017-02-02 00:00:00 2017-02-02 00

Re: [GENERAL] Fwd: Query parameter types not recognized

2017-02-13 Thread Roberto Balarezo
Hi Arjen, I already tried that too. In that case, the error changes to `org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: COALESCE types timestamp without time zone and interval cannot be matched`. I listed all the operators available for dates, and `+` and `-` take a date and an integer to return a date

Re: [GENERAL] Recorded PostgreSQL at 10TB and Beyond

2017-02-13 Thread Seref Arikan
Many thanks for this. On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > Hi all; > > There at least one request for the recorded talk. It is available at > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mKpfutwD0U > > The version to be delivered at Moscow will be slightly different in focus > (but with

[GENERAL] Recorded PostgreSQL at 10TB and Beyond

2017-02-13 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; There at least one request for the recorded talk. It is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mKpfutwD0U The version to be delivered at Moscow will be slightly different in focus (but with the same slides) so no if you see one you may still get something out of coming to the oth

Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public

2017-02-13 Thread Frank van Vugt
Hi Tom/Stephen/Adrian, Op zaterdag 11 februari 2017 15:28:55 schreef Tom Lane: > I'm inclined to argue that it was a mistake to include any non-pinned > objects in pg_init_privs. > We might need to fix pg_dump too, but I think these entries in > pg_init_privs should simply not be there. Thanks f