you're having problems with, along with the
version of Postgres in use.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
if not
strictly necessary) to make it unambiguous to the parser, as well as
easier for humans to read. I think it's good advice all around.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your
Diogo Biazus wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Diogo Biazus wrote:
Hi folks,
SNIP
Does anyone has an idea of a more cost eficient solution?
How to get a better performance without having to invest some
astronomicaly high amount of money?
This isn't hardware related, but FreeBSD 5 is not a particularly
... it speeds things up noticably.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
tmp_table1, append
a unique number to the name each time you create the temp table.
Hope this helps.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send
scott.marlowe wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Was this true for some previous version? I could have swore I read somewhere
that vacuum_mem had to be set high enough or vacuum wouldn't be able to clean
everything up (aside from anything locked
to
BIGINT. Otherwise, I can't imagine why you would be looking for a
BIGINT in an INT field.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http
are running on windows2k
Valter
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do
educated on? Why does int 1 cast to binary 0?
This is Posgres 7.4.1.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Bill Moran wrote:
Am I missing something here?
agelis=# select B'1'::int;
int4
--
1
(1 row)
agelis=# select 1::bit;
bit
-
0
(1 row)
agelis=# select B'1'=1;
?column?
--
f
(1 row)
Last I checked, binary 1 and integer 1 were equal
);
create function returns2strings()
returns demotype
as '
declare
rval demotype;
begin
rval.value1 := ''some string'';
rval.value2 := ''some other string'';
return rval;
end;
' language 'plpgsql';
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
7.4.1 is so slow under heavy work?
Is there a way to speed up inserts without eliminating indexes?
What about concurrent inserts (cocurrent spare test program execution)
into the same table? It did not work.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
a difference of
interpretation?
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
Bill Moran said:
I've hit an SQL problem that I'm a bit mystified by. I have two different
questions regarding this problem: why? and how do I work around it?
The following query:
SELECT GCP.id,
GCP.Name
FROMGov_Capital_Project GCP,
WHERE
, it works reliably.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
have any suggestions on how to convince the parser
to interpret the loop correctly? This is a MAJOR holdup for
me right now, and I'm on a tight schedule, so any help will be
a life-saver!
I've been unable to subscribe to the list, so please include me
in your reply directly.
--
Bill Moran
Potential
Tom Lane wrote:
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some of the plpgsql functions I've created work fine on 7.4, but
fail on 7.3.4. Specifically, when I use a FOR var IN select LOOP
loop with a LONG select statement, it works fine on 7.4, but
bonks with missing .. at end of SQL expression
of finding (and, usually pushing) its limits,
I've been most happy with it ...
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe
Richard Huxton wrote:
On Thursday 15 January 2004 15:02, Bill Moran wrote:
I'm having a little trouble understanding how to do something. I assume
I'm just missing it in the documentation, so a pointer to relevent docs
would be as welcome as a direct answer.
I have a project in which I'll need
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
801 - 821 of 821 matches
Mail list logo