Hello,
Is there a query out there where I can get a list of permissions associated to
a schema?
Something like the below query that I can do for a table, but for a schema
instead?
SELECT grantee, privilege_type
FROM
I would think this would be possible. I'm on 9.0.8
I have a reference between two tables, and want to populate a field in one table
with a value that's in the referenced table ( based on the FK reference of
course ).
with row as ( select my.atmos_site_id, my.stationid from my_stations my,
On 5/31/13 4:21 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:37 PM, David Salisbury salisb...@globe.gov
mailto:salisb...@globe.gov wrote:
I would think this would be possible. I'm on 9.0.8
I have a reference between two tables, and want to populate a field in one
table
On 5/31/13 4:45 PM, Bosco Rama wrote:
On 05/31/13 15:33, David Salisbury wrote:
And without trying too much ;), I'll bet there is no way to do this in SQL
proper. i.e.
I can't correlate an update with a select stmt, as in a correlated sub-query
sort of way.
So for this to work I would
On 1/28/13 1:05 PM, François Beausoleil wrote:
I would stay away from MacPorts.
Gotta agree on that one.
The last time I have been working with PostgreSQL on MacOS X, I used
the installer from
http://www.postgresqlformac.com/
There's also a different approach, that I've never
that, and with Geoserver.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeoServer
-ds
On 10/9/12 4:58 PM, Greg Williamson wrote:
You might look at the GIS extension, PostGIS:http://postgis.refractions.net/
Not sure how much yu need to do, but a company I used to work for ran a WMS
service off of an
On 9/24/12 12:20 PM, cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
Good afternoon,
When accessing PostgreSQL via psql, is it possible to make use of a custom
prompt? I would like something like postgres=# instead of just postgres=#. My
search was fruitless (see next paragraph).
And if I'm allowed two questions in
It looks to me like you're misusing git..
You should only git init once, and always use that directory.
Then pg_dump, which should create one file per database
with the file name you've specified.
Not sure of the flags but I'd recommend plain text format.
I'm also unsure what you mean by
On 8/6/12 3:31 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:22 AM, sunpengblueva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,Frirends,
Are there any commands in pgsql/bin/ corresponding create tablespace?
I know:
createuser== create role
createdb==create database
Hi!
No, but you can
On 5/31/12 8:36 AM, John Townsend wrote:
There are least 10 Procedural Languages
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PL/pgSQL available for PostGreSQL. The
one that comes with the installation is PL/pgSQL.
Which ones do you use and why?
I've often wondered how these external languages perform,
On 5/30/12 9:42 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
Think I realize where the confusion is now. When Jasen mentioned integer
datetimes he was referring to the internal storage format Postgres uses
to record the datetime value. Via the magic of programming(others will
have to fill that part in) the
On 5/27/12 12:25 AM, Jasen Betts wrote:
The query: show integer_datetimes; should return 'on' which means
timestamps are microsecond precision if it returns 'off' your database
was built with floating point timstamps and equality tests will be
unreliable,
I find that rather interesting. I
I'm trying to debug an intermittent problem I'm seeing in one of our rollup
scripts.
I'll try to summarize. A table has a measured_at field, of which I calculate
another
time value based on that field and a longitude value, called solar_noon, and I
summarize
min/max values grouped around
Actually, figured I'd post the whole function, painful as it
might be for anyone to read. If anyone sees something that's a bit
of a risk ( like perhaps the whole thing ;)
On 5/18/12 5:19 PM, David Salisbury wrote:
I'm trying to debug an intermittent problem I'm seeing in one of our
rollup
Oh.. and while I'm polluting this list (sorry) it's a timestamp field
without a time zone.
thanks for any ideas,
-Dave
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
In trying to get an sql stmt to return a default value, I read in the docs..
The COALESCE function returns the first of its arguments that is not null. Null is returned only if all arguments are null. It is
often used to substitute a default value for null values when data is retrieved for
On 3/29/12 4:26 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:16 AM, David Salisburysalisb...@globe.gov wrote:
development=# select coalesce(anum,100) from t1 where anum = 4;
What you have there is rather different from COALESCE, as you're
looking for a case where the row completely
On 2/27/12 9:51 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
The options seem to be run the script as the owner of the
plpgsql EXTENSION or do not include the comment.
How does one instruct pg_dump not to include the COMMENT
for the plpgsql extension?
The case in question is the automated creation of an sql
On 2/23/12 9:06 AM, Jack Christensen wrote:
As another Rails developer using PostgreSQL I think I can explain the
use case. In standard Rails usage, the ORM handles all SQL query
generation and thus the application is database agnostic. It is typical
to use SQLite in development and testing
On 2/16/12 7:27 AM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
Musial, Jan (GIUB)jan.mus...@giub.unibe.ch wrote:
smallint,month smallint,day smallint,time_stamp date); I would like to
That's silly, use one (and only one) field, timestamp (or timestamptz)
Don't use never ever multiple columns for the same
On 2/9/12 10:08 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
I have reports containing macroinvertebrate collection data for several
hundred (or several thousand) of taxa. There is no natural key since there
are multiple rows for each site/date pair. Years ago Joe Celko taught me to
seek natural keys whenever
On 2/9/12 5:25 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
For water quality data the primary key is (site, date, param) since
there's only one value for a given parameter collected at a specific
site on
a single day. No surrogate key needed.
Yea. I was wondering if the surrogate key debate really boils down to
On 1/17/12 6:00 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:31 PM, David Salisburysalisb...@globe.gov wrote:
I've got a table:
Taxa
Column |Type
+-
id | integer |
On 1/18/12 9:46 AM, David Salisbury wrote:
On 1/17/12 6:00 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:31 PM, David Salisburysalisb...@globe.gov
wrote:
I've got a table:
Taxa
Column | Type
+-
id | integer |
parent_id | integer
I've got a table:
Taxa
Column |Type
+-
id | integer |
parent_id | integer |
taxonomic_rank | character varying(32) |
latin_name | character
On 12/29/11 3:11 AM, saqi...@igis.nust.edu.pk wrote:
Hi every1 how are u all??? Members i am new in postgres and want to
work on pgrouting but i am facing some issue with it. Will u please help
me???
I have loaded my line shapefile in pgadmin environment, which creates a
table name 'Route',
On 10/14/11 10:58 AM, David Fetter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 07:49:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
David Salisburysalisb...@globe.gov writes:
Short version, is there a way to implement an exclusive OR in a where clause?
The boolean operator will do the trick.
(x = y) (a = b)
On 10/17/11 1:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/17/11 12:15 PM, David Salisbury wrote:
is the same as !=, which is
different than the fabled XOR I was hoping for. In fact
they would never equal.
F != F - false
F != T - true
T != F - true
T != T - false
how is that different than XOR
On 10/17/11 2:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/17/11 12:40 PM, David Salisbury wrote:
something
---
1
2
select * from test where ( something = 1.5 + .5 ) .XOR. ( something =
1.5 - .5 );
well, something[1] = 1, so thats FALSE .XOR. TRUE, which is TRUE
and, something[2] = 2, so
I'm guessing that this isn't possible, but you guys are pretty smart. :)
Short version, is there a way to implement an exclusive OR in a where clause?
table1
dt1(timestamp)
-
3 mins
5 mins
7 mins
table2
dt2(timestamp), timedifference(interval)
--- --
On 10/13/11 4:38 PM, Phil Couling wrote:
Hi All
I've got a table with (amongst others) two fields:
last_updated timestamp with time zone;
update_cycle interval;
I'd like to create an index on these, to index time next update time
(last_updated + update_cycle).
When I try this I get an error
We all know i can
create table freaky as select abunchofstuff.
I work with rails developers and they are fussy about having an
auto incrementing id field. Is there a way I can eak that out
of the above type statement, or am I stuck with creating the
table and no short cuts?
create table
I'm a bit new to PG, and having troubles with timestamps. The docs list:
timestamp [ (p) ] [ without time zone ] 8 bytes both date and time 4713 BC
5874897 AD 1 microsecond / 14 digits
timestamp [ (p) ] with time zone8 bytes both date and time, with time
zone 4713 BC
Hope someone's out there for this one. Basically I'm creating a summary table
of many
underlying tables in one select statement ( though that may have to change ).
My problem
can be shown in this example..
select my_function( timeofmeasurement, longitude ) as solarnoon,
extract(epoch
34 matches
Mail list logo
