Hi Joanne,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Mammarelli, Joanne T
wrote:
> Installed postgresql-devel .. getting closer ..
>
> Installed Packages
> postgresql.x86_64 9.2.13-1.el7_1
> @rhel7-x86_64-2015-07
> postgresql-devel.x86_64
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Jason Dusek jason.du...@gmail.com wrote:
The databases involved are all Postgres 9.4 or 9.3. The FDW is the Postgres
FDW.
The join node (the one from which queries are issued) is Postgres 9.4
installed yesterday from the Postgres Apt repository. It's using the
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Geoff Montee geoff.mon...@gmail.com wrote:
The NOTICE right before the error might provide useful information:
NOTICE: DB-Library notice: Msg #: 40508, Msg state: 1, Msg: USE
statement is not supported to switch between databases. Use a new
connection
Hi Filip,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Filip Rembiałkowski
filip.rembialkow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I will be happy to hear your opinion which one is better - odbc_fdw or
tds_fdw?
In terms of performance / stability / convenience.
(Pg on OpenSuse, MS SQL on Win2008 )
Thanks!
I'm
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Filip Rembiałkowski
filip.rembialkow...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Geoff.
Actually I have a problem - maybe you can point me in the right direction?
CREATE EXTENSION tds_fdw;
CREATE EXTENSION
CREATE SERVER ms FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER tds_fdw OPTIONS
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Alberto Cabello Sánchez albe...@unex.es
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:04:21 -0700
Daniel Lenski dlen...@gmail.com wrote:
If I include the primary key of a table in my GROUP BY clause, PG 9.3
allows me to refer to other columns of that table without explicit
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:23 AM, sumita su...@avaya.com wrote:
Does postgresql support the use of security labels or sensitivity
markings?
If what you want is some kind of row-level security, you have to roll your
own when using PostgreSQL. Security_barrier views are a good option for
this.
PostgreSQL support was in
development at one time. I'm not sure how far they got, or if they are
still working on it.
http://www.continuent.com/solutions/replication
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tungsten
Geoff Montee
They don't apply server-wide. They apply to that user's session:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/sql-set.html
Geoff
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Hello World worldani...@gmail.com wrote:
SET statement_timeout=0;
SET work_mem=1024GB;
I just realized about the SET