Re: [GENERAL] invalid page header

2006-04-24 Thread Jo De Haes
is Travers wrote: Jo De Haes wrote: OK. The saga continues, everything is a little bit more clear, but at the same time a lot more confusing. Today i wanted to reproduce the problem again. And guess what? A vacuum of the database went thru without any problems. I dump the block i was havin

Re: [GENERAL] invalid page header

2006-03-29 Thread Jo De Haes
ection: Flags: 0x0001 (LEAF) Blocks: Previous (12811) Next (12769) Level (0) 1ff0: 0b32 e131 0100 .2...1...... *** End of Requested Range Encountered. Last Block Read: 39248 *** Tom Lane wrote: Jo De Haes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I asked the developpe

Re: [GENERAL] invalid page header

2006-03-29 Thread Jo De Haes
ntion that same block returns the correct data and the complete database is fine. Where is the problem? The fact that i'm running 2 different instances? Cache on raid controller messing up? Some strange voodoo? Jo De Haes wrote: Ok, So we reran everything and go

Re: [GENERAL] invalid page header

2006-03-27 Thread Jo De Haes
Tom Lane wrote: "Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: "Jo De Haes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote CETERROR: XX001: invalid page header in block 22182 of relation "dunn_main" I suppose there is no system error happens during the period (like

[GENERAL] invalid page header

2006-03-22 Thread Jo De Haes
27;t have a heavy insert/update load. Does anybody have any clues or can tell me how to more exactly pinpoint the problem? Hardware/bug in Postgresql? Any advice would be more than welcome, because I'm afraid the developper will demand to have an Oracle installation if I can