Yes, that was the results of our tests ...
It seems we'll have to do a lot of work on the application to separate
the queries in order to achieve the load-balancing.
Thanks anyway,
Best regards,
Paulo Correia
On 17/05/12 09:32, Sumit Raja wrote:
Unsure you can achieve this without a
th no
connection pool?
Best regards,
Paulo Correia
On 15/05/12 09:01, Sumit Raja wrote:
On 14 May 2012 17:28, Paulo Correia wrote:
Hello all!
Having a Postgres 9.0 with assynchronous streaming replication to a
hot-standby slave, both with CentOs 5.6, how can I use both DB instances for
query
disruptive with
the existing pool on the application servers.
Has anyone had this issue before? Any suggestions?
Best regards,
Paulo Correia
On 13/04/12 14:38, Paulo Correia wrote:
Hi!
I have a Postgres 9.0 on CentOs 5.6 with a functional asynchronous
streaming replication to a hot-sta
or a Tomcat server,
using the server connection pooling facilities and from that we would
access the database, or the balancer.
Has anyone managed to do this with pgPool-II? Any other options?
Best regards,
Paulo Correia
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org
1. set inheritance as before of sub-table to main table
2. drop the constraint on table and subtables, apply the alter table
alter column and add the constraint again
3. any other way?
Best regards,
Paulo Correia