On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:50:37 -0800 Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I would imagine that if you simply stow components where you
>choose to
>stow them, and say, "this is part of what we always install for
>all
>our customers," and never bring OSS up as an issue, they probably
>won't notice they
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:20:26 -0800 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The license may allow it, but you really need a fair amount of
>chutzpah
>to expect that people help you with it ...
Hah...I certainly agree.
Keep in mind though...we're not actually selling them the database.
It's not my
Guys,
In our effort to distribute PostgreSQL to our customers, our higher
ups would like to reduce the visibility that it is indeed
PostgreSQL for a number of reasons at a few of our customer sites
(particularly because these particular customers are very wary of
open source).
I know the lice
subscribe
Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account
required
http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480
Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail
https://www.hushssl.com?l=485
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2:
Hello.
We'd like to start deploying PostgreSQL to our customers. They run
primarily on Windows and are very low tech for the most part.
I need the install routine to do a number of things after install,
including creating a database and primary user.
I know that the 8.0 beta version for Window
