On 22/11/10 07:40, Elliot Chance wrote:
> It does surprise me a bit that when I (or someone else) signs up to a mailing
> list (not postgres specifically) that there is no fine print or agreement
> that says something along the lines of "Your email address will be plastered
> all over the inter
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:40:34AM +1100, Elliot Chance wrote:
> It does surprise me a bit that when I (or someone else) signs up to
> a mailing list (not postgres specifically) that there is no fine
> print or agreement that says something along the lines of "Your
> email address will be plastered
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:40 +1100, Elliot Chance wrote:
> > I would argue that if the person wants to use a forum, aren't they
> > saying they don't want to be contacted via email. I think we just throw
> > it only to the forum (that is the user) and leave it that. Forum users
> > don't get the
On 21/11/2010, at 2:59 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:46, Elliot Chance wrote:
> for...@postgresql.com.au is pointed to a black hole so that email
> disappears but the mailing list gets another copy. When the mailing list
> gets its c
On 21 Nov 2010, at 16:16, Trevor Talbot wrote:
>> I do see a difficulty here; if the forum software is only subscribed with
>> one e-mail address, how is it going to distinguish between a reply-all and a
>> private reply?
>> Maybe it would help to subscribe it using two or three addresses, so tha
Alban Hertroys writes:
> I'm not one of the people who've been communicating off-list about this with
> him, so I may be wrong, but to my understanding what Magnus wants (the
> requirement, not a solution to it) is this:
> - Person A is on the forums and sends a message that ends up on the ML (
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 18:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alban Hertroys writes:
>> I'm not one of the people who've been communicating off-list about this with
>> him, so I may be wrong, but to my understanding what Magnus wants (the
>> requirement, not a solution to it) is this:
>
>> - Person A is on
On 11/21/2010 06:04 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2010, at 24:17, Trevor Talbot wrote:
>
>>> I can't explain it any clearer, your email response goes to the mailing
>>> list and that mailing list sends a copy to the original person thats how a
>>> mailing list works. It also sends a copy
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 05:04, Alban Hertroys
wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2010, at 24:17, Trevor Talbot wrote:
>> Elliot, Magnus wants forum->list email to come from a per-user address
>> so that when he replies directly to that address (without sending it
>> to the list), the response is mapped to a PM.
On 21 Nov 2010, at 24:17, Trevor Talbot wrote:
>> I can't explain it any clearer, your email response goes to the mailing list
>> and that mailing list sends a copy to the original person thats how a
>> mailing list works. It also sends a copy to the forum which is parses you
>> and that person
On Nov 20, 2010, at 8:22 , Elliot Chance wrote:
> One very annoying thing about Apple Mail with these lists is that when I hit
> reply if I don't change the To address to the mailing list or manually add
> the Cc then it doesn't even get sent to the mailing list.
Use Reply to All: Cmd-Shift-R.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 05:46, Elliot Chance wrote:
> On 21/11/2010, at 12:32 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:22, Elliot Chance wrote:
>> Use "Reply To All" when you want to send to the list. It's what
>> everybody else has been doing for ages :-) If you want to read u
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:46, Elliot Chance wrote:
> >>> for...@postgresql.com.au is pointed to a black hole so that email
> >>> disappears but the mailing list gets another copy. When the mailing list
> >>> gets its copy it sends a copy to the forum (because the forum
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:46, Elliot Chance wrote:
>>> for...@postgresql.com.au is pointed to a black hole so that email
>>> disappears but the mailing list gets another copy. When the mailing list
>>> gets its copy it sends a copy to the forum (because the forum is just like
>>> a subscribed
Using the reply to all, thanks.
On 21/11/2010, at 12:32 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:22, Elliot Chance wrote:
>>
>> On 20/11/2010, at 11:52 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:26, Elliot Chance wrote:
On 20/11/2010, at 9:52 PM, Ma
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 14:22, Elliot Chance wrote:
>
> On 20/11/2010, at 11:52 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:26, Elliot Chance wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20/11/2010, at 9:52 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:57, Elliot Chance
wrote:
>
>
On 20/11/2010, at 11:52 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:26, Elliot Chance wrote:
>>
>> On 20/11/2010, at 9:52 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:57, Elliot Chance wrote:
On 20/11/2010, at 3:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
