Re: [GENERAL] name truncation problem in 7.0.0

2001-05-11 Thread Ed Loehr
Tom Lane wrote: > > Ed Loehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Maybe someone can confirm what looks like a long-name-truncation bug in > > 7.0.0? > > I see no bug here; it told you what name it planned to use for the > sequence: > > > psql:/home/ed/pgbug:8: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create impli

Re: [GENERAL] name truncation problem in 7.0.0

2001-05-11 Thread Tom Lane
Ed Loehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe someone can confirm what looks like a long-name-truncation bug in > 7.0.0? I see no bug here; it told you what name it planned to use for the sequence: > psql:/home/ed/pgbug:8: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit > sequence 'process_state_subsc

[GENERAL] name truncation problem in 7.0.0

2001-05-11 Thread Ed Loehr
Maybe someone can confirm what looks like a long-name-truncation bug in 7.0.0? I haven't tested it on newer releases, nor have I dug into the code. The problem appears to be that a different truncation algorithm is used for creating the truncated sequence name than the algorithm used when doing