Jeffery Collins writes: > Wanna' bet? Perhaps I had an even older version? FWIW, it turns out that mine is actually 2.2.1. > I don't know alot about the readline library, but perhaps it would be > sufficient to check for the presence of "using_history" in the library > and not bother to check for the presence of history.h? After reviewing the old code, this is seemingly what it did. The history functions are then used without declaring them. I should probably squeeze a patch for this into 7.0.1. Of course, updating readline to a "sane" version is a valid workaround as well. (And believe me, there are plenty of "insane" versions out there that we already had to put up with.) -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
