Adrian Klaver wrote:
Motion:
The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to deal with
technical questions. Upon a decision on said list the result be posted
to the Postgres web site for consideration.
Been
Hello,
This thread is deprecated. The CoC Final Draft has been submitted to
-core for final modification, acceptance or decline.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Melvin Davidson
wrote:
> Although it has been previously disregarded, I would like to second the
> motion that all further discussion regarding the CoC go to it's own list.
>
> Consider this.
> 1. The Coc will eventually apply to ALL
On 1/25/2016 12:55 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
Regina Obe wrote:
At this point I feel we should:
...
While I personally feel that a code of conduct does not need to be an explicit
document and is something that "happens" through the way people on the lists
behave and the way the core team and
Although it has been previously disregarded, I would like to second the
motion that all further discussion regarding the CoC go to it's own list.
Consider this.
1. The Coc will eventually apply to ALL PostgreSQL mail lists.
2. There will be a need to have additions and revisions to the Coc.
3. As
Regina Obe wrote:
> At this point I feel we should:
>
> a) Move this to pgsql-advocacy [...]
> Or
>
> b) Start a new PostgreSQL mailing list - call it - pgsql-coc.
-1
While I personally feel that a code of conduct does not need to be an explicit
document and is something that "happens"
On 1/23/2016 3:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 01/23/2016 03:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
Adrian Klaver wrote:
Motion:
The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to
- Original Message -
>
>
> > On Jan 24, 2016, at 7:59 PM, Roxanne Reid-Bennett wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/23/2016 3:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> On 01/23/2016 03:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
> Adrian Klaver
I hate to say so folks, but I think Roxanne and Adrian and all those others
that said similar things are right.
We have created a sustained disruption in a mailing list that is supposed to be
about purely technical PostgreSQL topics.
It's bad for a Coc to start off by everyone involved in
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 17:27 -0500, Dane Foster wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:00 PM, bret_stern ment.com> wrote:
> > Adrian,
> > I hope you reconsider. You have far more value to the list.
> > The CoC dictators will flame out, then where will we be.
> > Just sit
> On Jan 24, 2016, at 7:59 PM, Roxanne Reid-Bennett wrote:
>
>> On 1/23/2016 3:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On 01/23/2016 03:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
Adrian Klaver wrote:
> Motion:
>
> The Coc
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-01-23 15:31:02 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > With respect Adrian, that is a motion that never stands a chance. If you
> > don't want to read it, set up a filter that sends it right to the round
> > file.
>
>
On 01/23/2016 03:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 01/23/2016 03:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
Adrian Klaver wrote:
Motion:
The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:00 PM, bret_stern <
bret_st...@machinemanagement.com> wrote:
> Adrian,
> I hope you reconsider. You have far more value to the list.
> The CoC dictators will flame out, then where will we be.
> Just sit on the sidelines until the show is
> over.
> Look forward to the
om: Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>
Date: 01/24/2016 12:10 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com>, Berend Tober
<bto...@computer.org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] A motion
On 01/23/2016 03:3
2016-01-24 22:10 GMT+02:00 Adrian Klaver :
> Thought long and hard about this and while it is possible, it is not
> something I feel I should have to do. This conversation in its many threads
> has spun out of control and into areas that a) out of the scope of this
>
On 01/23/2016 03:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
Adrian Klaver wrote:
Motion:
The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to deal with
technical questions. Upon a decision
On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
Adrian Klaver wrote:
Motion:
The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to deal with
technical questions. Upon a decision on said list the result be posted
to the
On 2016-01-23 15:31:02 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> With respect Adrian, that is a motion that never stands a chance. If you
> don't want to read it, set up a filter that sends it right to the round
> file.
It'd help if there weren't six, but one thread...
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing
On 01/23/2016 03:40 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2016-01-23 15:31:02 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
With respect Adrian, that is a motion that never stands a chance. If you
don't want to read it, set up a filter that sends it right to the round
file.
It'd help if there weren't six, but one
On 01/23/2016 03:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 01/23/2016 03:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
Adrian Klaver wrote:
Motion:
The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to
Motion:
The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to deal with
technical questions. Upon a decision on said list the result be posted
to the Postgres web site for consideration.
Thanks,
--
Adrian Klaver
22 matches
Mail list logo