On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:11 PM, David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:23:31AM +0200, Marco Bizzarri wrote:
Hi all.
I need to keep a numer of counters in my application; my counters
are currently stored in a table:
name | next_value | year
The counters must be
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Berend Tober [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way I understand the documentation at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/transaction-iso.html;
and
'http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/explicit-locking.html',
you should not have to use the
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Marco Bizzarri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Berend Tober [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way I understand the documentation at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/transaction-iso.html;
and
Hi all.
I need to keep a numer of counters in my application; my counters are
currently stored in a table:
name | next_value | year
The counters must be progressive numbers with no holes in between
them, and they must restart from 1 every year. What I've done so far
is to access them while in
Marco Bizzarri wrote:
Hi all.
I need to keep a numer of counters in my application; my counters are
currently stored in a table:
name | next_value | year
The counters must be progressive numbers with no holes in between
them, and they must restart from 1 every year. What I've done so
Thanks for the advice, Craig.
I'm on a number of different PostgreSQL versions, ranging from 7.4 to
8.3, so I've to retain, where possible, compatibility with older
versions.
Is this better on a transaction/serialization point of view?
Regards
Marco
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Craig
Marco Bizzarri wrote:
Thanks for the advice, Craig.
I'm on a number of different PostgreSQL versions, ranging from 7.4 to
8.3, so I've to retain, where possible, compatibility with older
versions.
Is this better on a transaction/serialization point of view?
As far as I know it's not
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Craig Ringer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco Bizzarri wrote:
Thanks for the advice, Craig.
I'm on a number of different PostgreSQL versions, ranging from 7.4 to
8.3, so I've to retain, where possible, compatibility with older
versions.
Is this better on a
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:23:31AM +0200, Marco Bizzarri wrote:
Hi all.
I need to keep a numer of counters in my application; my counters
are currently stored in a table:
name | next_value | year
The counters must be progressive numbers with no holes in between
them, and they must
Marco Bizzarri wrote:
Hi all.
I need to keep a numer of counters in my application; my
counters are
currently stored in a table:
name | next_value | year
The counters must be progressive numbers with no holes in between
them, and they must restart from 1 every year. What I've done
so
10 matches
Mail list logo
