On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 06:59:06PM +0100, Julian Scarfe wrote:
> I've got a database (7.4) whose system tables have been long neglected.
> Instead of the 100 or so pages I'd expect for 4000 rows after VACUUM, I've
> got 24,000 pages and a mere 1.4 million unused item pointers.
>
> If it were an
I've got a database (7.4) whose system tables have been long neglected.
Instead of the 100 or so pages I'd expect for 4000 rows after VACUUM, I've
got 24,000 pages and a mere 1.4 million unused item pointers.
If it were an ordinary table, I'd CLUSTER it, as from experience it would be
vastly q
