Re: [GENERAL] Controlling proliferation of postgres.exe processes

2009-06-23 Thread Alan Hodgson
On Tuesday 23 June 2009, Radcon Entec wrote: > Greetings! > > At the current moment, our customer's computer has 22 instances of > postgres.exe running.  When a colleague checked a few minutes ago, there > were 29.  Our contract specifies that we cannot consume more than 40% of > the computer's me

Re: [GENERAL] Controlling proliferation of postgres.exe processes

2009-06-23 Thread Greg Stark
> In response to Radcon Entec : >> At the current moment, our customer's computer has 22 instances of >> postgres.exe running.  When a colleague checked a few minutes ago, there >> were 29.  Our contract specifies that we cannot consume more than 40% of the >> computer's memory, and we're over t

Re: [GENERAL] Controlling proliferation of postgres.exe processes

2009-06-23 Thread Scott Mead
2009/6/23 Radcon Entec > Greetings! > > At the current moment, our customer's computer has 22 instances of > postgres.exe running. When a colleague checked a few minutes ago, there > were 29. Our contract specifies that we cannot consume more than 40% of the > computer's memory, and we're over

Re: [GENERAL] Controlling proliferation of postgres.exe processes

2009-06-23 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Radcon Entec : > Greetings! > > At the current moment, our customer's computer has 22 instances of > postgres.exe running.  When a colleague checked a few minutes ago, there were > 29.  Our contract specifies that we cannot consume more than 40% of the > computer's memory, and w

[GENERAL] Controlling proliferation of postgres.exe processes

2009-06-23 Thread Radcon Entec
Greetings! At the current moment, our customer's computer has 22 instances of postgres.exe running.  When a colleague checked a few minutes ago, there were 29.  Our contract specifies that we cannot consume more than 40% of the computer's memory, and we're over that level.  When does an instanc