On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, William Temperley wrote:
>> > I could potentially run a database in each of these countries and
>> > provide 100% uptime, obviously raising the issue of version conflicts
>> > that would require hand-merging.
>
> Can
Le Wednesday 15 April 2009, Greg Smith a écrit :
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, William Temperley wrote:
> > I could potentially run a database in each of these countries and
> > provide 100% uptime, obviously raising the issue of version conflicts
> > that would require hand-merging.
Can you partition da
Will,
William Temperley wrote:
Hi All
I'm wondering if anyone can share any insights or experience with
temporary versions of databases, allowing "disconnected editing"
during Internet downtime.
What do your users use for updating data? Software that you developed
for them? Do they use a w
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, William Temperley wrote:
I could potentially run a database in each of these countries and
provide 100% uptime, obviously raising the issue of version conflicts
that would require hand-merging.
It sounds like you want an asynchronous master-slave database architecture
whe
Hi All
I'm wondering if anyone can share any insights or experience with
temporary versions of databases, allowing "disconnected editing"
during Internet downtime.
The use-case is that I run a Postgres database, hosted in the UK, but
used by scientists in several other countries - Ecuador, Vietna
