Steven also submitted this subject in the bugs list: "BUG #2168:
45.000.000 records too much?". He also posted more details and how to
reproduce the bug.
Andrew, no special constraints or triggers were used.
Thanks, Rudolph
---(end of broadcast)--
Me and a friend are testing some operations for a search application in
PostgreSQL. In version 8.1 my friend tried to copy the result of a join
into another table, about 45.000.000 (small) records. This is the
result:
testsearch=> insert into t_documentword2 (SELECT document_id,
t_word2.id,
freque
On 2006-01-13, Rudolph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Me and a friend are testing some operations for a search application in
> PostgreSQL. In version 8.1 my friend tried to copy the result of a join
> into another table, about 45.000.000 (small) records. This is the
> result:
Do you have any constr
"Rudolph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Me and a friend are testing some operations for a search application in
> PostgreSQL. In version 8.1 my friend tried to copy the result of a join
> into another table, about 45.000.000 (small) records. This is the
> result:
>
> testsearch=> insert into t_docum
