Don Seiler writes:
> Yes exactly. That's the parent PID for that process.
Presumably, the reason the command columns look the same is that the child
process hasn't yet had a chance to change its PS display string. The fact
that its accumulated runtime shows as 00:00:00 squares
Yes exactly. That's the parent PID for that process.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 08/11/2017 02:35 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> On 8/11/17 10:15, Murtuza Zabuawala wrote:
>
> some time whe have 2 process postgres for 1 instance like this
>
>
On 08/11/2017 02:35 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 8/11/17 10:15, Murtuza Zabuawala wrote:
some time whe have 2 process postgres for 1 instance like this
exppgs*17769* 1 0 01:06 ?00:01:04
/usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h
On 8/11/17 10:15, Murtuza Zabuawala wrote:
> some time whe have 2 process postgres for 1 instance like this
>
>
> exppgs 17769 1 0 01:06 ?00:01:04
> /usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h
> bd-sillage.info.
> exppgs 39922 17769 0 15:39 ?
Forwarding to pgsql-general list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: francis cherat
Date: Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 7:36 PM
Subject: 2 process postgres -D for one instance
To: "pgadmin-supp...@lists.postgresql.org" <
pgadmin-supp...@lists.postgresql.org>
Hi,