Re: [GENERAL] High Availability for PostgreSQL on Windows 2003.

2008-11-18 Thread Jonah H. Harris
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Pietro Tedesco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have an instance of PostgreSQL on Windows 2003 with some application > and our customer have asked for solution > 24x7 without human intervention for problem on the hardware/software > primary instance. > Actualy there

Re: [GENERAL] High Availability for PostgreSQL on Windows 2003.

2008-11-18 Thread Serge Fonville
There are a couple of solutions probably. First off, search pgfoundry for possibilities, look into clustering and replication. A little more insight would make it easier to answer your question: Determine what you exactly want, what kind of uptime at what expense. How should it be made available (

Re: [GENERAL] High Availability for PostgreSQL on Windows 2003.

2008-11-18 Thread Serge Fonville
There are a couple of solutions probably. First off, search pgfoundry for possibilities, look into clustering and replication. A little more insight would make it easier to answer your question: Determine what you exactly want, what kind of uptime at what expense. How should it be made available (

Re: [GENERAL] High Availability for PostgreSQL on Windows 2003.

2008-11-18 Thread Magnus Hagander
On 18 nov 2008, at 17.09, Pietro Tedesco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We have an instance of PostgreSQL on Windows 2003 with some application and our customer have asked for solution 24x7 without human intervention for problem on the hardware/software primary instance. Actualy there is a so

[GENERAL] High Availability for PostgreSQL on Windows 2003.

2008-11-18 Thread Pietro Tedesco
We have an instance of PostgreSQL on Windows 2003 with some application and our customer have asked for solution 24x7 without human intervention for problem on the hardware/software primary instance. Actualy there is a solution with standby. Is there a product of High Availability for PostgreSQL on