Re: [GENERAL] Licensing of .DLL files

2006-03-20 Thread Magnus Hagander
> None of these licenses prohibit distribution, AFAIK. > > You may have to offer source, etc. We normally just bundle > all source tar files for similar components that we > distribute with our code. If you do that, there's definitl no problem. We wouldn't bundle anything that doesn't uphold *

Re: [GENERAL] Licensing of .DLL files

2006-03-20 Thread Josh Rovero
None of these licenses prohibit distribution, AFAIK. You may have to offer source, etc. We normally just bundle all source tar files for similar components that we distribute with our code. Dave Page wrote: On 20/3/06 13:17, "Vladimira Nitrova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, We'd lik

Re: [GENERAL] Licensing of .DLL files

2006-03-20 Thread Dave Page
On 20/3/06 13:17, "Vladimira Nitrova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > We'd like to distribute the following .DLL files within our software so > as our users don't have to install these files separately: > comerr32.dll, krb5_32.dll, libeay32.dll, libintl-2.dll, libiconv-2.dll > and ssle

[GENERAL] Licensing of .DLL files

2006-03-20 Thread Vladimira Nitrova
Hello, We'd like to distribute the following .DLL files within our software so as our users don't have to install these files separately: comerr32.dll, krb5_32.dll, libeay32.dll, libintl-2.dll, libiconv-2.dll and ssleay32.dll. However, the problem is that we don't know who we shall contact to